Cargando…
Diagnostic Accuracy of Elastography and Liver Disease: A Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND: Ultrasound-based transient elastography (TE) is a non-invasive alternative to liver biopsy for the staging of hepatic fibrosis due to various chronic liver diseases. This meta-analysis aims to assess the diagnostic accuracy of TE for detecting liver cirrhosis (F4) and severe fibrosis (F3...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elmer Press
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9635782/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36407808 http://dx.doi.org/10.14740/gr1557 |
_version_ | 1784824785522393088 |
---|---|
author | Malik, Preeti Pillai, Shreejith Agarwal, Kriti Abdelwahed, Salwa Bhandari, Renu Singh, Abhishek Chidharla, Anusha Patel, Kajal Singh, Priyanka Manaktala, Pritika Rabbani, Rizwan Koritala, Thoyaja Gupta, Sachin |
author_facet | Malik, Preeti Pillai, Shreejith Agarwal, Kriti Abdelwahed, Salwa Bhandari, Renu Singh, Abhishek Chidharla, Anusha Patel, Kajal Singh, Priyanka Manaktala, Pritika Rabbani, Rizwan Koritala, Thoyaja Gupta, Sachin |
author_sort | Malik, Preeti |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Ultrasound-based transient elastography (TE) is a non-invasive alternative to liver biopsy for the staging of hepatic fibrosis due to various chronic liver diseases. This meta-analysis aims to assess the diagnostic accuracy of TE for detecting liver cirrhosis (F4) and severe fibrosis (F3) in patients with chronic liver diseases, in comparison to the gold standard liver biopsy. METHODS: A systematic search was performed using PubMed search engine following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines from inception to May 2021. The meta-analysis studies evaluating the diagnostic accuracy of TE for severe fibrosis and cirrhosis were identified. We conducted a meta-meta-analysis to generate pooled estimates of the sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic odds ratios (ORs) for F3 and F4 fibrosis stage. RESULTS: We included five studies with a total of 124 sub-studies and 20,341 patients in our analysis. Three studies have reported the diagnostic accuracy of TE in detecting F3/severe fibrosis stage and found 81.9% pooled sensitivity (95% confidence interval (CI): 79.9-83.7%; P < 0.001) (I(2) = 0%), 84.7% pooled specificity (95% CI: 81.3-87.6%) (I(2) = 81%; P = 0.02). All five studies reported the diagnostic accuracy of TE in detecting F4/liver cirrhosis stage. We found 84.8% pooled sensitivity (95% CI: 81.4-87.7%) (I(2) = 86.4%; P < 0.001), 87.5% pooled specificity (95% CI: 85.4-89.3%) (I(2) = 90%; P < 0.001) and pooled diagnostic OR (41.8; 95% CI: 3.9 - 56.5) (I(2) = 87%; P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Ultrasound-based TE has excellent diagnostic accuracy for identifying cirrhosis and liver fibrosis stages 3. Future studies should focus on estimating the diagnostic accuracy of other fibrosis stages in chronic liver disease patients. This will eventually decrease the risk associated with invasive liver biopsy. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9635782 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Elmer Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-96357822022-11-17 Diagnostic Accuracy of Elastography and Liver Disease: A Meta-Analysis Malik, Preeti Pillai, Shreejith Agarwal, Kriti Abdelwahed, Salwa Bhandari, Renu Singh, Abhishek Chidharla, Anusha Patel, Kajal Singh, Priyanka Manaktala, Pritika Rabbani, Rizwan Koritala, Thoyaja Gupta, Sachin Gastroenterology Res Original Article BACKGROUND: Ultrasound-based transient elastography (TE) is a non-invasive alternative to liver biopsy for the staging of hepatic fibrosis due to various chronic liver diseases. This meta-analysis aims to assess the diagnostic accuracy of TE for detecting liver cirrhosis (F4) and severe fibrosis (F3) in patients with chronic liver diseases, in comparison to the gold standard liver biopsy. METHODS: A systematic search was performed using PubMed search engine following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines from inception to May 2021. The meta-analysis studies evaluating the diagnostic accuracy of TE for severe fibrosis and cirrhosis were identified. We conducted a meta-meta-analysis to generate pooled estimates of the sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic odds ratios (ORs) for F3 and F4 fibrosis stage. RESULTS: We included five studies with a total of 124 sub-studies and 20,341 patients in our analysis. Three studies have reported the diagnostic accuracy of TE in detecting F3/severe fibrosis stage and found 81.9% pooled sensitivity (95% confidence interval (CI): 79.9-83.7%; P < 0.001) (I(2) = 0%), 84.7% pooled specificity (95% CI: 81.3-87.6%) (I(2) = 81%; P = 0.02). All five studies reported the diagnostic accuracy of TE in detecting F4/liver cirrhosis stage. We found 84.8% pooled sensitivity (95% CI: 81.4-87.7%) (I(2) = 86.4%; P < 0.001), 87.5% pooled specificity (95% CI: 85.4-89.3%) (I(2) = 90%; P < 0.001) and pooled diagnostic OR (41.8; 95% CI: 3.9 - 56.5) (I(2) = 87%; P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Ultrasound-based TE has excellent diagnostic accuracy for identifying cirrhosis and liver fibrosis stages 3. Future studies should focus on estimating the diagnostic accuracy of other fibrosis stages in chronic liver disease patients. This will eventually decrease the risk associated with invasive liver biopsy. Elmer Press 2022-10 2022-10-19 /pmc/articles/PMC9635782/ /pubmed/36407808 http://dx.doi.org/10.14740/gr1557 Text en Copyright 2022, Malik et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial 4.0 International License, which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Malik, Preeti Pillai, Shreejith Agarwal, Kriti Abdelwahed, Salwa Bhandari, Renu Singh, Abhishek Chidharla, Anusha Patel, Kajal Singh, Priyanka Manaktala, Pritika Rabbani, Rizwan Koritala, Thoyaja Gupta, Sachin Diagnostic Accuracy of Elastography and Liver Disease: A Meta-Analysis |
title | Diagnostic Accuracy of Elastography and Liver Disease: A Meta-Analysis |
title_full | Diagnostic Accuracy of Elastography and Liver Disease: A Meta-Analysis |
title_fullStr | Diagnostic Accuracy of Elastography and Liver Disease: A Meta-Analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Diagnostic Accuracy of Elastography and Liver Disease: A Meta-Analysis |
title_short | Diagnostic Accuracy of Elastography and Liver Disease: A Meta-Analysis |
title_sort | diagnostic accuracy of elastography and liver disease: a meta-analysis |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9635782/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36407808 http://dx.doi.org/10.14740/gr1557 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT malikpreeti diagnosticaccuracyofelastographyandliverdiseaseametaanalysis AT pillaishreejith diagnosticaccuracyofelastographyandliverdiseaseametaanalysis AT agarwalkriti diagnosticaccuracyofelastographyandliverdiseaseametaanalysis AT abdelwahedsalwa diagnosticaccuracyofelastographyandliverdiseaseametaanalysis AT bhandarirenu diagnosticaccuracyofelastographyandliverdiseaseametaanalysis AT singhabhishek diagnosticaccuracyofelastographyandliverdiseaseametaanalysis AT chidharlaanusha diagnosticaccuracyofelastographyandliverdiseaseametaanalysis AT patelkajal diagnosticaccuracyofelastographyandliverdiseaseametaanalysis AT singhpriyanka diagnosticaccuracyofelastographyandliverdiseaseametaanalysis AT manaktalapritika diagnosticaccuracyofelastographyandliverdiseaseametaanalysis AT rabbanirizwan diagnosticaccuracyofelastographyandliverdiseaseametaanalysis AT koritalathoyaja diagnosticaccuracyofelastographyandliverdiseaseametaanalysis AT guptasachin diagnosticaccuracyofelastographyandliverdiseaseametaanalysis |