Cargando…

Perspectives on exercise intensity, volume, step characteristics and health outcomes in walking for transport

BACKGROUND: Quantification of movement intensity and energy utilization, together with frequency of trips, duration, distance, step counts and cadence, is essential for interpreting the character of habitual walking for transport, and its potential support of health. The purpose of the study is to i...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Schantz, Peter, Olsson, Karin Sofia Elisabeth, Salier Eriksson, Jane, Rosdahl, Hans
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9635924/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36339183
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2022.911863
_version_ 1784824822179561472
author Schantz, Peter
Olsson, Karin Sofia Elisabeth
Salier Eriksson, Jane
Rosdahl, Hans
author_facet Schantz, Peter
Olsson, Karin Sofia Elisabeth
Salier Eriksson, Jane
Rosdahl, Hans
author_sort Schantz, Peter
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Quantification of movement intensity and energy utilization, together with frequency of trips, duration, distance, step counts and cadence, is essential for interpreting the character of habitual walking for transport, and its potential support of health. The purpose of the study is to illuminate this with valid methods and novel perspectives, and to thereby provide a new basis for characterizing and interpreting walking in relation to health outcomes. METHODS: Habitual middle-aged commuting pedestrians (males = 10, females = 10) were investigated in the laboratory at rest and with maximal treadmill and cycle ergometer tests. Thereafter, levels of oxygen uptake, energy expenditure, ventilation, heart rate, blood lactate, rated perceived exertion, cadence, number of steps, duration, distance, and speed were recorded during the normal walking commute of each participant in Greater Stockholm, Sweden. The number of commutes per week over the year was self-reported. RESULTS: Walking in the field demanded about 30% more energy per km compared to level treadmill walking. For both sexes, the walking intensity in field was about 46% of maximal oxygen uptake, and energy expenditure amounted to 0.96 kcal · kg(−)(1) · km(−)(1). The MET values (males: 6.2; females: 6.5) mirrored similar levels of walking speed (males: 5.7; females: 5.9 km · h(−)(1)) and levels of oxygen uptake (males: 18.6; females: 19.5 mL · kg(−)(1) · min(−)(1)). The average number of MET-hours per week in a typical month was 22 for males and 20 for females. This resulted in a total weekly energy expenditure of ~1,570 and 1,040 kcal for males and females, respectively. Over the year, the number of walking commutes and their accumulated distance was ~385 trips and 800 km for both sexes. CONCLUSION: Walking in naturalistic field settings demands its own studies. When males and females walk to work, their relative aerobic intensities and absolute energy demands for a given distance are similar. It is equivalent to the lower part of the moderate relative intensity domain. The combination of oxygen uptake, trip duration and frequency leads to high and sustained levels of MET-hours as well as energy expenditure per week over the year, with a clear health enhancing potential. Based on this study we recommend 6000 transport steps per day, or equivalent, during five weekdays, over the year, in order to reach optimal health gains.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9635924
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-96359242022-11-05 Perspectives on exercise intensity, volume, step characteristics and health outcomes in walking for transport Schantz, Peter Olsson, Karin Sofia Elisabeth Salier Eriksson, Jane Rosdahl, Hans Front Public Health Public Health BACKGROUND: Quantification of movement intensity and energy utilization, together with frequency of trips, duration, distance, step counts and cadence, is essential for interpreting the character of habitual walking for transport, and its potential support of health. The purpose of the study is to illuminate this with valid methods and novel perspectives, and to thereby provide a new basis for characterizing and interpreting walking in relation to health outcomes. METHODS: Habitual middle-aged commuting pedestrians (males = 10, females = 10) were investigated in the laboratory at rest and with maximal treadmill and cycle ergometer tests. Thereafter, levels of oxygen uptake, energy expenditure, ventilation, heart rate, blood lactate, rated perceived exertion, cadence, number of steps, duration, distance, and speed were recorded during the normal walking commute of each participant in Greater Stockholm, Sweden. The number of commutes per week over the year was self-reported. RESULTS: Walking in the field demanded about 30% more energy per km compared to level treadmill walking. For both sexes, the walking intensity in field was about 46% of maximal oxygen uptake, and energy expenditure amounted to 0.96 kcal · kg(−)(1) · km(−)(1). The MET values (males: 6.2; females: 6.5) mirrored similar levels of walking speed (males: 5.7; females: 5.9 km · h(−)(1)) and levels of oxygen uptake (males: 18.6; females: 19.5 mL · kg(−)(1) · min(−)(1)). The average number of MET-hours per week in a typical month was 22 for males and 20 for females. This resulted in a total weekly energy expenditure of ~1,570 and 1,040 kcal for males and females, respectively. Over the year, the number of walking commutes and their accumulated distance was ~385 trips and 800 km for both sexes. CONCLUSION: Walking in naturalistic field settings demands its own studies. When males and females walk to work, their relative aerobic intensities and absolute energy demands for a given distance are similar. It is equivalent to the lower part of the moderate relative intensity domain. The combination of oxygen uptake, trip duration and frequency leads to high and sustained levels of MET-hours as well as energy expenditure per week over the year, with a clear health enhancing potential. Based on this study we recommend 6000 transport steps per day, or equivalent, during five weekdays, over the year, in order to reach optimal health gains. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-10-21 /pmc/articles/PMC9635924/ /pubmed/36339183 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2022.911863 Text en Copyright © 2022 Schantz, Olsson, Salier Eriksson and Rosdahl. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Public Health
Schantz, Peter
Olsson, Karin Sofia Elisabeth
Salier Eriksson, Jane
Rosdahl, Hans
Perspectives on exercise intensity, volume, step characteristics and health outcomes in walking for transport
title Perspectives on exercise intensity, volume, step characteristics and health outcomes in walking for transport
title_full Perspectives on exercise intensity, volume, step characteristics and health outcomes in walking for transport
title_fullStr Perspectives on exercise intensity, volume, step characteristics and health outcomes in walking for transport
title_full_unstemmed Perspectives on exercise intensity, volume, step characteristics and health outcomes in walking for transport
title_short Perspectives on exercise intensity, volume, step characteristics and health outcomes in walking for transport
title_sort perspectives on exercise intensity, volume, step characteristics and health outcomes in walking for transport
topic Public Health
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9635924/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36339183
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2022.911863
work_keys_str_mv AT schantzpeter perspectivesonexerciseintensityvolumestepcharacteristicsandhealthoutcomesinwalkingfortransport
AT olssonkarinsofiaelisabeth perspectivesonexerciseintensityvolumestepcharacteristicsandhealthoutcomesinwalkingfortransport
AT saliererikssonjane perspectivesonexerciseintensityvolumestepcharacteristicsandhealthoutcomesinwalkingfortransport
AT rosdahlhans perspectivesonexerciseintensityvolumestepcharacteristicsandhealthoutcomesinwalkingfortransport