Cargando…

Comparison of artificial intelligence algorithms and their ranking for the prediction of genetic merit in sheep

As the amount of data on farms grows, it is important to evaluate the potential of artificial intelligence for making farming predictions. Considering all this, this study was undertaken to evaluate various machine learning (ML) algorithms using 52-year data for sheep. Data preparation was done befo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hamadani, Ambreen, Ganai, Nazir A., Mudasir, Syed, Shanaz, Syed, Alam, Safeer, Hussain, Ishraq
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9636184/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36333409
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-23499-w
_version_ 1784824883057786880
author Hamadani, Ambreen
Ganai, Nazir A.
Mudasir, Syed
Shanaz, Syed
Alam, Safeer
Hussain, Ishraq
author_facet Hamadani, Ambreen
Ganai, Nazir A.
Mudasir, Syed
Shanaz, Syed
Alam, Safeer
Hussain, Ishraq
author_sort Hamadani, Ambreen
collection PubMed
description As the amount of data on farms grows, it is important to evaluate the potential of artificial intelligence for making farming predictions. Considering all this, this study was undertaken to evaluate various machine learning (ML) algorithms using 52-year data for sheep. Data preparation was done before analysis. Breeding values were estimated using Best Linear Unbiased Prediction. 12 ML algorithms were evaluated for their ability to predict the breeding values. The variance inflation factor for all features selected through principal component analysis (PCA) was 1. The correlation coefficients between true and predicted values for artificial neural networks, Bayesian ridge regression, classification and regression trees, gradient boosting algorithm, K nearest neighbours, multivariate adaptive regression splines (MARS) algorithm, polynomial regression, principal component regression (PCR), random forests, support vector machines, XGBoost algorithm were 0.852, 0.742, 0.869, 0.915, 0.781, 0.746, 0.742, 0.746, 0.917, 0.777, 0.915 respectively for breeding value prediction. Random forests had the highest correlation coefficients. Among the prediction equations generated using OLS, the highest coefficient of determination was 0.569. A total of 12 machine learning models were developed from the prediction of breeding values in sheep in the present study. It may be said that machine learning techniques can perform predictions with reasonable accuracies and can thus be viable alternatives to conventional strategies for breeding value prediction.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9636184
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-96361842022-11-06 Comparison of artificial intelligence algorithms and their ranking for the prediction of genetic merit in sheep Hamadani, Ambreen Ganai, Nazir A. Mudasir, Syed Shanaz, Syed Alam, Safeer Hussain, Ishraq Sci Rep Article As the amount of data on farms grows, it is important to evaluate the potential of artificial intelligence for making farming predictions. Considering all this, this study was undertaken to evaluate various machine learning (ML) algorithms using 52-year data for sheep. Data preparation was done before analysis. Breeding values were estimated using Best Linear Unbiased Prediction. 12 ML algorithms were evaluated for their ability to predict the breeding values. The variance inflation factor for all features selected through principal component analysis (PCA) was 1. The correlation coefficients between true and predicted values for artificial neural networks, Bayesian ridge regression, classification and regression trees, gradient boosting algorithm, K nearest neighbours, multivariate adaptive regression splines (MARS) algorithm, polynomial regression, principal component regression (PCR), random forests, support vector machines, XGBoost algorithm were 0.852, 0.742, 0.869, 0.915, 0.781, 0.746, 0.742, 0.746, 0.917, 0.777, 0.915 respectively for breeding value prediction. Random forests had the highest correlation coefficients. Among the prediction equations generated using OLS, the highest coefficient of determination was 0.569. A total of 12 machine learning models were developed from the prediction of breeding values in sheep in the present study. It may be said that machine learning techniques can perform predictions with reasonable accuracies and can thus be viable alternatives to conventional strategies for breeding value prediction. Nature Publishing Group UK 2022-11-04 /pmc/articles/PMC9636184/ /pubmed/36333409 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-23499-w Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
Hamadani, Ambreen
Ganai, Nazir A.
Mudasir, Syed
Shanaz, Syed
Alam, Safeer
Hussain, Ishraq
Comparison of artificial intelligence algorithms and their ranking for the prediction of genetic merit in sheep
title Comparison of artificial intelligence algorithms and their ranking for the prediction of genetic merit in sheep
title_full Comparison of artificial intelligence algorithms and their ranking for the prediction of genetic merit in sheep
title_fullStr Comparison of artificial intelligence algorithms and their ranking for the prediction of genetic merit in sheep
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of artificial intelligence algorithms and their ranking for the prediction of genetic merit in sheep
title_short Comparison of artificial intelligence algorithms and their ranking for the prediction of genetic merit in sheep
title_sort comparison of artificial intelligence algorithms and their ranking for the prediction of genetic merit in sheep
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9636184/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36333409
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-23499-w
work_keys_str_mv AT hamadaniambreen comparisonofartificialintelligencealgorithmsandtheirrankingforthepredictionofgeneticmeritinsheep
AT ganainazira comparisonofartificialintelligencealgorithmsandtheirrankingforthepredictionofgeneticmeritinsheep
AT mudasirsyed comparisonofartificialintelligencealgorithmsandtheirrankingforthepredictionofgeneticmeritinsheep
AT shanazsyed comparisonofartificialintelligencealgorithmsandtheirrankingforthepredictionofgeneticmeritinsheep
AT alamsafeer comparisonofartificialintelligencealgorithmsandtheirrankingforthepredictionofgeneticmeritinsheep
AT hussainishraq comparisonofartificialintelligencealgorithmsandtheirrankingforthepredictionofgeneticmeritinsheep