Cargando…
Comparison of artificial intelligence algorithms and their ranking for the prediction of genetic merit in sheep
As the amount of data on farms grows, it is important to evaluate the potential of artificial intelligence for making farming predictions. Considering all this, this study was undertaken to evaluate various machine learning (ML) algorithms using 52-year data for sheep. Data preparation was done befo...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9636184/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36333409 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-23499-w |
_version_ | 1784824883057786880 |
---|---|
author | Hamadani, Ambreen Ganai, Nazir A. Mudasir, Syed Shanaz, Syed Alam, Safeer Hussain, Ishraq |
author_facet | Hamadani, Ambreen Ganai, Nazir A. Mudasir, Syed Shanaz, Syed Alam, Safeer Hussain, Ishraq |
author_sort | Hamadani, Ambreen |
collection | PubMed |
description | As the amount of data on farms grows, it is important to evaluate the potential of artificial intelligence for making farming predictions. Considering all this, this study was undertaken to evaluate various machine learning (ML) algorithms using 52-year data for sheep. Data preparation was done before analysis. Breeding values were estimated using Best Linear Unbiased Prediction. 12 ML algorithms were evaluated for their ability to predict the breeding values. The variance inflation factor for all features selected through principal component analysis (PCA) was 1. The correlation coefficients between true and predicted values for artificial neural networks, Bayesian ridge regression, classification and regression trees, gradient boosting algorithm, K nearest neighbours, multivariate adaptive regression splines (MARS) algorithm, polynomial regression, principal component regression (PCR), random forests, support vector machines, XGBoost algorithm were 0.852, 0.742, 0.869, 0.915, 0.781, 0.746, 0.742, 0.746, 0.917, 0.777, 0.915 respectively for breeding value prediction. Random forests had the highest correlation coefficients. Among the prediction equations generated using OLS, the highest coefficient of determination was 0.569. A total of 12 machine learning models were developed from the prediction of breeding values in sheep in the present study. It may be said that machine learning techniques can perform predictions with reasonable accuracies and can thus be viable alternatives to conventional strategies for breeding value prediction. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9636184 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-96361842022-11-06 Comparison of artificial intelligence algorithms and their ranking for the prediction of genetic merit in sheep Hamadani, Ambreen Ganai, Nazir A. Mudasir, Syed Shanaz, Syed Alam, Safeer Hussain, Ishraq Sci Rep Article As the amount of data on farms grows, it is important to evaluate the potential of artificial intelligence for making farming predictions. Considering all this, this study was undertaken to evaluate various machine learning (ML) algorithms using 52-year data for sheep. Data preparation was done before analysis. Breeding values were estimated using Best Linear Unbiased Prediction. 12 ML algorithms were evaluated for their ability to predict the breeding values. The variance inflation factor for all features selected through principal component analysis (PCA) was 1. The correlation coefficients between true and predicted values for artificial neural networks, Bayesian ridge regression, classification and regression trees, gradient boosting algorithm, K nearest neighbours, multivariate adaptive regression splines (MARS) algorithm, polynomial regression, principal component regression (PCR), random forests, support vector machines, XGBoost algorithm were 0.852, 0.742, 0.869, 0.915, 0.781, 0.746, 0.742, 0.746, 0.917, 0.777, 0.915 respectively for breeding value prediction. Random forests had the highest correlation coefficients. Among the prediction equations generated using OLS, the highest coefficient of determination was 0.569. A total of 12 machine learning models were developed from the prediction of breeding values in sheep in the present study. It may be said that machine learning techniques can perform predictions with reasonable accuracies and can thus be viable alternatives to conventional strategies for breeding value prediction. Nature Publishing Group UK 2022-11-04 /pmc/articles/PMC9636184/ /pubmed/36333409 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-23499-w Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Article Hamadani, Ambreen Ganai, Nazir A. Mudasir, Syed Shanaz, Syed Alam, Safeer Hussain, Ishraq Comparison of artificial intelligence algorithms and their ranking for the prediction of genetic merit in sheep |
title | Comparison of artificial intelligence algorithms and their ranking for the prediction of genetic merit in sheep |
title_full | Comparison of artificial intelligence algorithms and their ranking for the prediction of genetic merit in sheep |
title_fullStr | Comparison of artificial intelligence algorithms and their ranking for the prediction of genetic merit in sheep |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of artificial intelligence algorithms and their ranking for the prediction of genetic merit in sheep |
title_short | Comparison of artificial intelligence algorithms and their ranking for the prediction of genetic merit in sheep |
title_sort | comparison of artificial intelligence algorithms and their ranking for the prediction of genetic merit in sheep |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9636184/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36333409 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-23499-w |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hamadaniambreen comparisonofartificialintelligencealgorithmsandtheirrankingforthepredictionofgeneticmeritinsheep AT ganainazira comparisonofartificialintelligencealgorithmsandtheirrankingforthepredictionofgeneticmeritinsheep AT mudasirsyed comparisonofartificialintelligencealgorithmsandtheirrankingforthepredictionofgeneticmeritinsheep AT shanazsyed comparisonofartificialintelligencealgorithmsandtheirrankingforthepredictionofgeneticmeritinsheep AT alamsafeer comparisonofartificialintelligencealgorithmsandtheirrankingforthepredictionofgeneticmeritinsheep AT hussainishraq comparisonofartificialintelligencealgorithmsandtheirrankingforthepredictionofgeneticmeritinsheep |