Cargando…
Depth of response and response kinetics of isatuximab plus carfilzomib and dexamethasone in relapsed multiple myeloma
The IKEMA study (Randomized, Open Label, Multicenter Study Assessing the Clinical Benefit of Isatuximab Combined With Carfilzomib [Kyprolis®] and Dexamethasone Versus Carfilzomib With Dexamethasone in Patients With Relapse and/or Refractory Multiple Myeloma Previously Treated With 1 to 3 Prior Lines...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
The American Society of Hematology
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9636327/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35594559 http://dx.doi.org/10.1182/bloodadvances.2021006713 |
_version_ | 1784824921564643328 |
---|---|
author | Martin, Thomas Mikhael, Joseph Hajek, Roman Kim, Kihyun Suzuki, Kenshi Hulin, Cyrille Garg, Mamta Quach, Hang Sia, Hanlon George, Anup Konstantinova, Tatiana Risse, Marie-Laure Asset, Gaelle Macé, Sandrine van de Velde, Helgi Moreau, Philippe |
author_facet | Martin, Thomas Mikhael, Joseph Hajek, Roman Kim, Kihyun Suzuki, Kenshi Hulin, Cyrille Garg, Mamta Quach, Hang Sia, Hanlon George, Anup Konstantinova, Tatiana Risse, Marie-Laure Asset, Gaelle Macé, Sandrine van de Velde, Helgi Moreau, Philippe |
author_sort | Martin, Thomas |
collection | PubMed |
description | The IKEMA study (Randomized, Open Label, Multicenter Study Assessing the Clinical Benefit of Isatuximab Combined With Carfilzomib [Kyprolis®] and Dexamethasone Versus Carfilzomib With Dexamethasone in Patients With Relapse and/or Refractory Multiple Myeloma Previously Treated With 1 to 3 Prior Lines; #NCT03275285) was a randomized, open-label, multicenter phase 3 study investigating isatuximab plus carfilzomib and dexamethasone (Isa-Kd) vs Kd in patients with relapsed multiple myeloma. This subanalysis analyzed the depth of response of Isa-Kd vs Kd. The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS); secondary end points included overall response rate, very good partial response or better (≥VGPR) rate, complete response (CR) rate, and minimal residual disease (MRD) negativity rate (assessed in patients with ≥VGPR by next-generation sequencing at a 10(−5) sensitivity level). At a median follow-up of 20.7 months, deeper responses were observed in the Isa-Kd arm vs the Kd arm, with ≥VGPR 72.6% vs 56.1% and CR of 39.7% vs 27.6%, respectively. MRD negativity occurred in 53 (29.6%) of 179 patients in the Isa-Kd arm vs 16 (13.0%) of 123 patients in the Kd arm, with 20.1% (Isa-Kd, 36 of 179 patients) vs 10.6% (Kd, 13 of 123 patients) reaching MRD-negative CR status. Achieving MRD negativity resulted in better PFS in both arms. A positive PFS treatment effect was seen with Isa-Kd in both MRD-negative patients (hazard ratio, 0.578; 95% CI, 0.052-6.405) and MRD-positive patients (hazard ratio, 0.670; 95% CI, 0.452-0.993). Exploratory analysis indicates that both current CR and MRD-negative CR rates are underestimated due to M-protein interference (potential adjusted CR rate, 45.8%; potential adjusted MRD-negative CR rate, 24.0%). In conclusion, there was a clinically meaningful improvement in depth of response with Isa-Kd. The CR rate in Isa-Kd was 39.7%. Mass spectrometry suggests that the potential adjusted CR rate could reach an unprecedented 45.8% of patients treated with Isa-Kd. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9636327 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | The American Society of Hematology |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-96363272022-11-07 Depth of response and response kinetics of isatuximab plus carfilzomib and dexamethasone in relapsed multiple myeloma Martin, Thomas Mikhael, Joseph Hajek, Roman Kim, Kihyun Suzuki, Kenshi Hulin, Cyrille Garg, Mamta Quach, Hang Sia, Hanlon George, Anup Konstantinova, Tatiana Risse, Marie-Laure Asset, Gaelle Macé, Sandrine van de Velde, Helgi Moreau, Philippe Blood Adv Clinical Trials and Observations The IKEMA study (Randomized, Open Label, Multicenter Study Assessing the Clinical Benefit of Isatuximab Combined With Carfilzomib [Kyprolis®] and Dexamethasone Versus Carfilzomib With Dexamethasone in Patients With Relapse and/or Refractory Multiple Myeloma Previously Treated With 1 to 3 Prior Lines; #NCT03275285) was a randomized, open-label, multicenter phase 3 study investigating isatuximab plus carfilzomib and dexamethasone (Isa-Kd) vs Kd in patients with relapsed multiple myeloma. This subanalysis analyzed the depth of response of Isa-Kd vs Kd. The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS); secondary end points included overall response rate, very good partial response or better (≥VGPR) rate, complete response (CR) rate, and minimal residual disease (MRD) negativity rate (assessed in patients with ≥VGPR by next-generation sequencing at a 10(−5) sensitivity level). At a median follow-up of 20.7 months, deeper responses were observed in the Isa-Kd arm vs the Kd arm, with ≥VGPR 72.6% vs 56.1% and CR of 39.7% vs 27.6%, respectively. MRD negativity occurred in 53 (29.6%) of 179 patients in the Isa-Kd arm vs 16 (13.0%) of 123 patients in the Kd arm, with 20.1% (Isa-Kd, 36 of 179 patients) vs 10.6% (Kd, 13 of 123 patients) reaching MRD-negative CR status. Achieving MRD negativity resulted in better PFS in both arms. A positive PFS treatment effect was seen with Isa-Kd in both MRD-negative patients (hazard ratio, 0.578; 95% CI, 0.052-6.405) and MRD-positive patients (hazard ratio, 0.670; 95% CI, 0.452-0.993). Exploratory analysis indicates that both current CR and MRD-negative CR rates are underestimated due to M-protein interference (potential adjusted CR rate, 45.8%; potential adjusted MRD-negative CR rate, 24.0%). In conclusion, there was a clinically meaningful improvement in depth of response with Isa-Kd. The CR rate in Isa-Kd was 39.7%. Mass spectrometry suggests that the potential adjusted CR rate could reach an unprecedented 45.8% of patients treated with Isa-Kd. The American Society of Hematology 2022-05-23 /pmc/articles/PMC9636327/ /pubmed/35594559 http://dx.doi.org/10.1182/bloodadvances.2021006713 Text en Copyright © 2022 The American Society of Hematology. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Clinical Trials and Observations Martin, Thomas Mikhael, Joseph Hajek, Roman Kim, Kihyun Suzuki, Kenshi Hulin, Cyrille Garg, Mamta Quach, Hang Sia, Hanlon George, Anup Konstantinova, Tatiana Risse, Marie-Laure Asset, Gaelle Macé, Sandrine van de Velde, Helgi Moreau, Philippe Depth of response and response kinetics of isatuximab plus carfilzomib and dexamethasone in relapsed multiple myeloma |
title | Depth of response and response kinetics of isatuximab plus carfilzomib and dexamethasone in relapsed multiple myeloma |
title_full | Depth of response and response kinetics of isatuximab plus carfilzomib and dexamethasone in relapsed multiple myeloma |
title_fullStr | Depth of response and response kinetics of isatuximab plus carfilzomib and dexamethasone in relapsed multiple myeloma |
title_full_unstemmed | Depth of response and response kinetics of isatuximab plus carfilzomib and dexamethasone in relapsed multiple myeloma |
title_short | Depth of response and response kinetics of isatuximab plus carfilzomib and dexamethasone in relapsed multiple myeloma |
title_sort | depth of response and response kinetics of isatuximab plus carfilzomib and dexamethasone in relapsed multiple myeloma |
topic | Clinical Trials and Observations |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9636327/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35594559 http://dx.doi.org/10.1182/bloodadvances.2021006713 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT martinthomas depthofresponseandresponsekineticsofisatuximabpluscarfilzomibanddexamethasoneinrelapsedmultiplemyeloma AT mikhaeljoseph depthofresponseandresponsekineticsofisatuximabpluscarfilzomibanddexamethasoneinrelapsedmultiplemyeloma AT hajekroman depthofresponseandresponsekineticsofisatuximabpluscarfilzomibanddexamethasoneinrelapsedmultiplemyeloma AT kimkihyun depthofresponseandresponsekineticsofisatuximabpluscarfilzomibanddexamethasoneinrelapsedmultiplemyeloma AT suzukikenshi depthofresponseandresponsekineticsofisatuximabpluscarfilzomibanddexamethasoneinrelapsedmultiplemyeloma AT hulincyrille depthofresponseandresponsekineticsofisatuximabpluscarfilzomibanddexamethasoneinrelapsedmultiplemyeloma AT gargmamta depthofresponseandresponsekineticsofisatuximabpluscarfilzomibanddexamethasoneinrelapsedmultiplemyeloma AT quachhang depthofresponseandresponsekineticsofisatuximabpluscarfilzomibanddexamethasoneinrelapsedmultiplemyeloma AT siahanlon depthofresponseandresponsekineticsofisatuximabpluscarfilzomibanddexamethasoneinrelapsedmultiplemyeloma AT georgeanup depthofresponseandresponsekineticsofisatuximabpluscarfilzomibanddexamethasoneinrelapsedmultiplemyeloma AT konstantinovatatiana depthofresponseandresponsekineticsofisatuximabpluscarfilzomibanddexamethasoneinrelapsedmultiplemyeloma AT rissemarielaure depthofresponseandresponsekineticsofisatuximabpluscarfilzomibanddexamethasoneinrelapsedmultiplemyeloma AT assetgaelle depthofresponseandresponsekineticsofisatuximabpluscarfilzomibanddexamethasoneinrelapsedmultiplemyeloma AT macesandrine depthofresponseandresponsekineticsofisatuximabpluscarfilzomibanddexamethasoneinrelapsedmultiplemyeloma AT vandeveldehelgi depthofresponseandresponsekineticsofisatuximabpluscarfilzomibanddexamethasoneinrelapsedmultiplemyeloma AT moreauphilippe depthofresponseandresponsekineticsofisatuximabpluscarfilzomibanddexamethasoneinrelapsedmultiplemyeloma |