Cargando…

A randomized multicenter evaluation of the efficacy of 0.15% hyaluronic acid versus 0.05% cyclosporine A in dry eye syndrome

Hyaluronic acid (HA) and cyclosporine A (CsA) eyedrops are commonly prescribed in dry eye syndrome (DES). The effectiveness of each preparation in DES is well-known, yet the superiority of one over another has been studied little. We assessed the efficacy and tolerability of 0.15% HA compared to com...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lee, Ji Eun, Kim, Sangyoon, Lee, Hyung Keun, Chung, Tae-Young, Kim, Jae Yong, Choi, Chul Young, Chung, So Hyang, Kim, Dong Hyun, Kim, Kyoung Woo, Chung, Jin Kwon, Hwang, Kyu Yeon, Hwang, Ho Sik, Kim, Jin Hyoung, Hyon, Joon Young
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9636392/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36333364
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-21330-0
_version_ 1784824932112269312
author Lee, Ji Eun
Kim, Sangyoon
Lee, Hyung Keun
Chung, Tae-Young
Kim, Jae Yong
Choi, Chul Young
Chung, So Hyang
Kim, Dong Hyun
Kim, Kyoung Woo
Chung, Jin Kwon
Hwang, Kyu Yeon
Hwang, Ho Sik
Kim, Jin Hyoung
Hyon, Joon Young
author_facet Lee, Ji Eun
Kim, Sangyoon
Lee, Hyung Keun
Chung, Tae-Young
Kim, Jae Yong
Choi, Chul Young
Chung, So Hyang
Kim, Dong Hyun
Kim, Kyoung Woo
Chung, Jin Kwon
Hwang, Kyu Yeon
Hwang, Ho Sik
Kim, Jin Hyoung
Hyon, Joon Young
author_sort Lee, Ji Eun
collection PubMed
description Hyaluronic acid (HA) and cyclosporine A (CsA) eyedrops are commonly prescribed in dry eye syndrome (DES). The effectiveness of each preparation in DES is well-known, yet the superiority of one over another has been studied little. We assessed the efficacy and tolerability of 0.15% HA compared to combinations of 0.05% CsA plus 0.5% carboxymethylcellulose (CMC), and 0.15% HA plus 0.05% CsA in patients with moderate to severe DES. Total 438 patients with moderate to severe DES were recruited and randomized for one of the three treatments for 12 weeks. Effectiveness was assessed at baseline, 4- and 12-weeks. The primary endpoint was change in corneal staining score. The secondary endpoints were tear break-up time (TBUT), strip meniscometry (SM) score, ocular surface disease index (OSDI) score, and tolerability questionnaire. The change in corneal staining score for 0.15% HA from the baseline was non-inferior to that of 0.05% CsA. Corneal staining score, TBUT, SM score, and OSDI score improved in all groups without statistically significant intergroup differences. Better tolerability and lower prevalence of adverse drug reactions were seen in 0.15% HA. Our findings suggest that 0.15% HA may be equivalently effective and safer than 0.05% CsA in treating moderate to severe DES.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9636392
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-96363922022-11-06 A randomized multicenter evaluation of the efficacy of 0.15% hyaluronic acid versus 0.05% cyclosporine A in dry eye syndrome Lee, Ji Eun Kim, Sangyoon Lee, Hyung Keun Chung, Tae-Young Kim, Jae Yong Choi, Chul Young Chung, So Hyang Kim, Dong Hyun Kim, Kyoung Woo Chung, Jin Kwon Hwang, Kyu Yeon Hwang, Ho Sik Kim, Jin Hyoung Hyon, Joon Young Sci Rep Article Hyaluronic acid (HA) and cyclosporine A (CsA) eyedrops are commonly prescribed in dry eye syndrome (DES). The effectiveness of each preparation in DES is well-known, yet the superiority of one over another has been studied little. We assessed the efficacy and tolerability of 0.15% HA compared to combinations of 0.05% CsA plus 0.5% carboxymethylcellulose (CMC), and 0.15% HA plus 0.05% CsA in patients with moderate to severe DES. Total 438 patients with moderate to severe DES were recruited and randomized for one of the three treatments for 12 weeks. Effectiveness was assessed at baseline, 4- and 12-weeks. The primary endpoint was change in corneal staining score. The secondary endpoints were tear break-up time (TBUT), strip meniscometry (SM) score, ocular surface disease index (OSDI) score, and tolerability questionnaire. The change in corneal staining score for 0.15% HA from the baseline was non-inferior to that of 0.05% CsA. Corneal staining score, TBUT, SM score, and OSDI score improved in all groups without statistically significant intergroup differences. Better tolerability and lower prevalence of adverse drug reactions were seen in 0.15% HA. Our findings suggest that 0.15% HA may be equivalently effective and safer than 0.05% CsA in treating moderate to severe DES. Nature Publishing Group UK 2022-11-04 /pmc/articles/PMC9636392/ /pubmed/36333364 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-21330-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
Lee, Ji Eun
Kim, Sangyoon
Lee, Hyung Keun
Chung, Tae-Young
Kim, Jae Yong
Choi, Chul Young
Chung, So Hyang
Kim, Dong Hyun
Kim, Kyoung Woo
Chung, Jin Kwon
Hwang, Kyu Yeon
Hwang, Ho Sik
Kim, Jin Hyoung
Hyon, Joon Young
A randomized multicenter evaluation of the efficacy of 0.15% hyaluronic acid versus 0.05% cyclosporine A in dry eye syndrome
title A randomized multicenter evaluation of the efficacy of 0.15% hyaluronic acid versus 0.05% cyclosporine A in dry eye syndrome
title_full A randomized multicenter evaluation of the efficacy of 0.15% hyaluronic acid versus 0.05% cyclosporine A in dry eye syndrome
title_fullStr A randomized multicenter evaluation of the efficacy of 0.15% hyaluronic acid versus 0.05% cyclosporine A in dry eye syndrome
title_full_unstemmed A randomized multicenter evaluation of the efficacy of 0.15% hyaluronic acid versus 0.05% cyclosporine A in dry eye syndrome
title_short A randomized multicenter evaluation of the efficacy of 0.15% hyaluronic acid versus 0.05% cyclosporine A in dry eye syndrome
title_sort randomized multicenter evaluation of the efficacy of 0.15% hyaluronic acid versus 0.05% cyclosporine a in dry eye syndrome
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9636392/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36333364
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-21330-0
work_keys_str_mv AT leejieun arandomizedmulticenterevaluationoftheefficacyof015hyaluronicacidversus005cyclosporineaindryeyesyndrome
AT kimsangyoon arandomizedmulticenterevaluationoftheefficacyof015hyaluronicacidversus005cyclosporineaindryeyesyndrome
AT leehyungkeun arandomizedmulticenterevaluationoftheefficacyof015hyaluronicacidversus005cyclosporineaindryeyesyndrome
AT chungtaeyoung arandomizedmulticenterevaluationoftheefficacyof015hyaluronicacidversus005cyclosporineaindryeyesyndrome
AT kimjaeyong arandomizedmulticenterevaluationoftheefficacyof015hyaluronicacidversus005cyclosporineaindryeyesyndrome
AT choichulyoung arandomizedmulticenterevaluationoftheefficacyof015hyaluronicacidversus005cyclosporineaindryeyesyndrome
AT chungsohyang arandomizedmulticenterevaluationoftheefficacyof015hyaluronicacidversus005cyclosporineaindryeyesyndrome
AT kimdonghyun arandomizedmulticenterevaluationoftheefficacyof015hyaluronicacidversus005cyclosporineaindryeyesyndrome
AT kimkyoungwoo arandomizedmulticenterevaluationoftheefficacyof015hyaluronicacidversus005cyclosporineaindryeyesyndrome
AT chungjinkwon arandomizedmulticenterevaluationoftheefficacyof015hyaluronicacidversus005cyclosporineaindryeyesyndrome
AT hwangkyuyeon arandomizedmulticenterevaluationoftheefficacyof015hyaluronicacidversus005cyclosporineaindryeyesyndrome
AT hwanghosik arandomizedmulticenterevaluationoftheefficacyof015hyaluronicacidversus005cyclosporineaindryeyesyndrome
AT kimjinhyoung arandomizedmulticenterevaluationoftheefficacyof015hyaluronicacidversus005cyclosporineaindryeyesyndrome
AT hyonjoonyoung arandomizedmulticenterevaluationoftheefficacyof015hyaluronicacidversus005cyclosporineaindryeyesyndrome
AT leejieun randomizedmulticenterevaluationoftheefficacyof015hyaluronicacidversus005cyclosporineaindryeyesyndrome
AT kimsangyoon randomizedmulticenterevaluationoftheefficacyof015hyaluronicacidversus005cyclosporineaindryeyesyndrome
AT leehyungkeun randomizedmulticenterevaluationoftheefficacyof015hyaluronicacidversus005cyclosporineaindryeyesyndrome
AT chungtaeyoung randomizedmulticenterevaluationoftheefficacyof015hyaluronicacidversus005cyclosporineaindryeyesyndrome
AT kimjaeyong randomizedmulticenterevaluationoftheefficacyof015hyaluronicacidversus005cyclosporineaindryeyesyndrome
AT choichulyoung randomizedmulticenterevaluationoftheefficacyof015hyaluronicacidversus005cyclosporineaindryeyesyndrome
AT chungsohyang randomizedmulticenterevaluationoftheefficacyof015hyaluronicacidversus005cyclosporineaindryeyesyndrome
AT kimdonghyun randomizedmulticenterevaluationoftheefficacyof015hyaluronicacidversus005cyclosporineaindryeyesyndrome
AT kimkyoungwoo randomizedmulticenterevaluationoftheefficacyof015hyaluronicacidversus005cyclosporineaindryeyesyndrome
AT chungjinkwon randomizedmulticenterevaluationoftheefficacyof015hyaluronicacidversus005cyclosporineaindryeyesyndrome
AT hwangkyuyeon randomizedmulticenterevaluationoftheefficacyof015hyaluronicacidversus005cyclosporineaindryeyesyndrome
AT hwanghosik randomizedmulticenterevaluationoftheefficacyof015hyaluronicacidversus005cyclosporineaindryeyesyndrome
AT kimjinhyoung randomizedmulticenterevaluationoftheefficacyof015hyaluronicacidversus005cyclosporineaindryeyesyndrome
AT hyonjoonyoung randomizedmulticenterevaluationoftheefficacyof015hyaluronicacidversus005cyclosporineaindryeyesyndrome