Cargando…
A randomized multicenter evaluation of the efficacy of 0.15% hyaluronic acid versus 0.05% cyclosporine A in dry eye syndrome
Hyaluronic acid (HA) and cyclosporine A (CsA) eyedrops are commonly prescribed in dry eye syndrome (DES). The effectiveness of each preparation in DES is well-known, yet the superiority of one over another has been studied little. We assessed the efficacy and tolerability of 0.15% HA compared to com...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9636392/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36333364 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-21330-0 |
_version_ | 1784824932112269312 |
---|---|
author | Lee, Ji Eun Kim, Sangyoon Lee, Hyung Keun Chung, Tae-Young Kim, Jae Yong Choi, Chul Young Chung, So Hyang Kim, Dong Hyun Kim, Kyoung Woo Chung, Jin Kwon Hwang, Kyu Yeon Hwang, Ho Sik Kim, Jin Hyoung Hyon, Joon Young |
author_facet | Lee, Ji Eun Kim, Sangyoon Lee, Hyung Keun Chung, Tae-Young Kim, Jae Yong Choi, Chul Young Chung, So Hyang Kim, Dong Hyun Kim, Kyoung Woo Chung, Jin Kwon Hwang, Kyu Yeon Hwang, Ho Sik Kim, Jin Hyoung Hyon, Joon Young |
author_sort | Lee, Ji Eun |
collection | PubMed |
description | Hyaluronic acid (HA) and cyclosporine A (CsA) eyedrops are commonly prescribed in dry eye syndrome (DES). The effectiveness of each preparation in DES is well-known, yet the superiority of one over another has been studied little. We assessed the efficacy and tolerability of 0.15% HA compared to combinations of 0.05% CsA plus 0.5% carboxymethylcellulose (CMC), and 0.15% HA plus 0.05% CsA in patients with moderate to severe DES. Total 438 patients with moderate to severe DES were recruited and randomized for one of the three treatments for 12 weeks. Effectiveness was assessed at baseline, 4- and 12-weeks. The primary endpoint was change in corneal staining score. The secondary endpoints were tear break-up time (TBUT), strip meniscometry (SM) score, ocular surface disease index (OSDI) score, and tolerability questionnaire. The change in corneal staining score for 0.15% HA from the baseline was non-inferior to that of 0.05% CsA. Corneal staining score, TBUT, SM score, and OSDI score improved in all groups without statistically significant intergroup differences. Better tolerability and lower prevalence of adverse drug reactions were seen in 0.15% HA. Our findings suggest that 0.15% HA may be equivalently effective and safer than 0.05% CsA in treating moderate to severe DES. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9636392 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-96363922022-11-06 A randomized multicenter evaluation of the efficacy of 0.15% hyaluronic acid versus 0.05% cyclosporine A in dry eye syndrome Lee, Ji Eun Kim, Sangyoon Lee, Hyung Keun Chung, Tae-Young Kim, Jae Yong Choi, Chul Young Chung, So Hyang Kim, Dong Hyun Kim, Kyoung Woo Chung, Jin Kwon Hwang, Kyu Yeon Hwang, Ho Sik Kim, Jin Hyoung Hyon, Joon Young Sci Rep Article Hyaluronic acid (HA) and cyclosporine A (CsA) eyedrops are commonly prescribed in dry eye syndrome (DES). The effectiveness of each preparation in DES is well-known, yet the superiority of one over another has been studied little. We assessed the efficacy and tolerability of 0.15% HA compared to combinations of 0.05% CsA plus 0.5% carboxymethylcellulose (CMC), and 0.15% HA plus 0.05% CsA in patients with moderate to severe DES. Total 438 patients with moderate to severe DES were recruited and randomized for one of the three treatments for 12 weeks. Effectiveness was assessed at baseline, 4- and 12-weeks. The primary endpoint was change in corneal staining score. The secondary endpoints were tear break-up time (TBUT), strip meniscometry (SM) score, ocular surface disease index (OSDI) score, and tolerability questionnaire. The change in corneal staining score for 0.15% HA from the baseline was non-inferior to that of 0.05% CsA. Corneal staining score, TBUT, SM score, and OSDI score improved in all groups without statistically significant intergroup differences. Better tolerability and lower prevalence of adverse drug reactions were seen in 0.15% HA. Our findings suggest that 0.15% HA may be equivalently effective and safer than 0.05% CsA in treating moderate to severe DES. Nature Publishing Group UK 2022-11-04 /pmc/articles/PMC9636392/ /pubmed/36333364 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-21330-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Article Lee, Ji Eun Kim, Sangyoon Lee, Hyung Keun Chung, Tae-Young Kim, Jae Yong Choi, Chul Young Chung, So Hyang Kim, Dong Hyun Kim, Kyoung Woo Chung, Jin Kwon Hwang, Kyu Yeon Hwang, Ho Sik Kim, Jin Hyoung Hyon, Joon Young A randomized multicenter evaluation of the efficacy of 0.15% hyaluronic acid versus 0.05% cyclosporine A in dry eye syndrome |
title | A randomized multicenter evaluation of the efficacy of 0.15% hyaluronic acid versus 0.05% cyclosporine A in dry eye syndrome |
title_full | A randomized multicenter evaluation of the efficacy of 0.15% hyaluronic acid versus 0.05% cyclosporine A in dry eye syndrome |
title_fullStr | A randomized multicenter evaluation of the efficacy of 0.15% hyaluronic acid versus 0.05% cyclosporine A in dry eye syndrome |
title_full_unstemmed | A randomized multicenter evaluation of the efficacy of 0.15% hyaluronic acid versus 0.05% cyclosporine A in dry eye syndrome |
title_short | A randomized multicenter evaluation of the efficacy of 0.15% hyaluronic acid versus 0.05% cyclosporine A in dry eye syndrome |
title_sort | randomized multicenter evaluation of the efficacy of 0.15% hyaluronic acid versus 0.05% cyclosporine a in dry eye syndrome |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9636392/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36333364 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-21330-0 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT leejieun arandomizedmulticenterevaluationoftheefficacyof015hyaluronicacidversus005cyclosporineaindryeyesyndrome AT kimsangyoon arandomizedmulticenterevaluationoftheefficacyof015hyaluronicacidversus005cyclosporineaindryeyesyndrome AT leehyungkeun arandomizedmulticenterevaluationoftheefficacyof015hyaluronicacidversus005cyclosporineaindryeyesyndrome AT chungtaeyoung arandomizedmulticenterevaluationoftheefficacyof015hyaluronicacidversus005cyclosporineaindryeyesyndrome AT kimjaeyong arandomizedmulticenterevaluationoftheefficacyof015hyaluronicacidversus005cyclosporineaindryeyesyndrome AT choichulyoung arandomizedmulticenterevaluationoftheefficacyof015hyaluronicacidversus005cyclosporineaindryeyesyndrome AT chungsohyang arandomizedmulticenterevaluationoftheefficacyof015hyaluronicacidversus005cyclosporineaindryeyesyndrome AT kimdonghyun arandomizedmulticenterevaluationoftheefficacyof015hyaluronicacidversus005cyclosporineaindryeyesyndrome AT kimkyoungwoo arandomizedmulticenterevaluationoftheefficacyof015hyaluronicacidversus005cyclosporineaindryeyesyndrome AT chungjinkwon arandomizedmulticenterevaluationoftheefficacyof015hyaluronicacidversus005cyclosporineaindryeyesyndrome AT hwangkyuyeon arandomizedmulticenterevaluationoftheefficacyof015hyaluronicacidversus005cyclosporineaindryeyesyndrome AT hwanghosik arandomizedmulticenterevaluationoftheefficacyof015hyaluronicacidversus005cyclosporineaindryeyesyndrome AT kimjinhyoung arandomizedmulticenterevaluationoftheefficacyof015hyaluronicacidversus005cyclosporineaindryeyesyndrome AT hyonjoonyoung arandomizedmulticenterevaluationoftheefficacyof015hyaluronicacidversus005cyclosporineaindryeyesyndrome AT leejieun randomizedmulticenterevaluationoftheefficacyof015hyaluronicacidversus005cyclosporineaindryeyesyndrome AT kimsangyoon randomizedmulticenterevaluationoftheefficacyof015hyaluronicacidversus005cyclosporineaindryeyesyndrome AT leehyungkeun randomizedmulticenterevaluationoftheefficacyof015hyaluronicacidversus005cyclosporineaindryeyesyndrome AT chungtaeyoung randomizedmulticenterevaluationoftheefficacyof015hyaluronicacidversus005cyclosporineaindryeyesyndrome AT kimjaeyong randomizedmulticenterevaluationoftheefficacyof015hyaluronicacidversus005cyclosporineaindryeyesyndrome AT choichulyoung randomizedmulticenterevaluationoftheefficacyof015hyaluronicacidversus005cyclosporineaindryeyesyndrome AT chungsohyang randomizedmulticenterevaluationoftheefficacyof015hyaluronicacidversus005cyclosporineaindryeyesyndrome AT kimdonghyun randomizedmulticenterevaluationoftheefficacyof015hyaluronicacidversus005cyclosporineaindryeyesyndrome AT kimkyoungwoo randomizedmulticenterevaluationoftheefficacyof015hyaluronicacidversus005cyclosporineaindryeyesyndrome AT chungjinkwon randomizedmulticenterevaluationoftheefficacyof015hyaluronicacidversus005cyclosporineaindryeyesyndrome AT hwangkyuyeon randomizedmulticenterevaluationoftheefficacyof015hyaluronicacidversus005cyclosporineaindryeyesyndrome AT hwanghosik randomizedmulticenterevaluationoftheefficacyof015hyaluronicacidversus005cyclosporineaindryeyesyndrome AT kimjinhyoung randomizedmulticenterevaluationoftheefficacyof015hyaluronicacidversus005cyclosporineaindryeyesyndrome AT hyonjoonyoung randomizedmulticenterevaluationoftheefficacyof015hyaluronicacidversus005cyclosporineaindryeyesyndrome |