Cargando…
Men’s perceptions and preferences regarding prostate cancer radiation therapy: A systematic scoping review
PURPOSE: To assess the literature on men’s preferences and perceptions regarding prostate cancer radiation therapy. METHODS: A scoping review was undertaken as per JBI guidelines. Searches were conducted in PubMed, CINAHL, Scopus and Science Direct with search terms including “prostate cancer,” “rad...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9636414/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36345391 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ctro.2022.10.007 |
_version_ | 1784824937051062272 |
---|---|
author | Brown, Amy Yim, Jackie Jones, Scott Tan, Alex Callander, Emily Watt, Kerrianne De Abreu Lourenco, Richard Pain, Tilley |
author_facet | Brown, Amy Yim, Jackie Jones, Scott Tan, Alex Callander, Emily Watt, Kerrianne De Abreu Lourenco, Richard Pain, Tilley |
author_sort | Brown, Amy |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: To assess the literature on men’s preferences and perceptions regarding prostate cancer radiation therapy. METHODS: A scoping review was undertaken as per JBI guidelines. Searches were conducted in PubMed, CINAHL, Scopus and Science Direct with search terms including “prostate cancer,” “radiotherapy,” “radiation therapy,” “radiation oncology,” “patient preferences,” “patient perceptions” and “patient experience.” The resultant studies were mapped and grouped according to the emergent themes and pathway stages. RESULTS: A total of 779 titles and abstracts were screened by two independent reviewers. Fifty-two full-text studies were reviewed, with 27 eligible for inclusion. There were 4 pre-treatment, 13 during treatment and 10 post-treatment studies covering broad themes of information needs (n = 3), preferences and decisions (n = 6), general experiences (n = 8), side effects (n = 6), and support (n = 4). There were a mix of methodologies, including 11 qualitative, 14 quantitative (including four preference studies), one mixed methods and one narrative review. CONCLUSION: There were only four preference studies, with the remaining 23 reporting on perceptions. Overall, there is a paucity of literature regarding patient preferences and perceptions of prostate cancer radiation therapy, particularly when considering how many clinical and technical studies are published in the area. This highlights opportunities for future research. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9636414 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-96364142022-11-06 Men’s perceptions and preferences regarding prostate cancer radiation therapy: A systematic scoping review Brown, Amy Yim, Jackie Jones, Scott Tan, Alex Callander, Emily Watt, Kerrianne De Abreu Lourenco, Richard Pain, Tilley Clin Transl Radiat Oncol Review Article PURPOSE: To assess the literature on men’s preferences and perceptions regarding prostate cancer radiation therapy. METHODS: A scoping review was undertaken as per JBI guidelines. Searches were conducted in PubMed, CINAHL, Scopus and Science Direct with search terms including “prostate cancer,” “radiotherapy,” “radiation therapy,” “radiation oncology,” “patient preferences,” “patient perceptions” and “patient experience.” The resultant studies were mapped and grouped according to the emergent themes and pathway stages. RESULTS: A total of 779 titles and abstracts were screened by two independent reviewers. Fifty-two full-text studies were reviewed, with 27 eligible for inclusion. There were 4 pre-treatment, 13 during treatment and 10 post-treatment studies covering broad themes of information needs (n = 3), preferences and decisions (n = 6), general experiences (n = 8), side effects (n = 6), and support (n = 4). There were a mix of methodologies, including 11 qualitative, 14 quantitative (including four preference studies), one mixed methods and one narrative review. CONCLUSION: There were only four preference studies, with the remaining 23 reporting on perceptions. Overall, there is a paucity of literature regarding patient preferences and perceptions of prostate cancer radiation therapy, particularly when considering how many clinical and technical studies are published in the area. This highlights opportunities for future research. Elsevier 2022-10-25 /pmc/articles/PMC9636414/ /pubmed/36345391 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ctro.2022.10.007 Text en © 2022 The Author(s) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Review Article Brown, Amy Yim, Jackie Jones, Scott Tan, Alex Callander, Emily Watt, Kerrianne De Abreu Lourenco, Richard Pain, Tilley Men’s perceptions and preferences regarding prostate cancer radiation therapy: A systematic scoping review |
title | Men’s perceptions and preferences regarding prostate cancer radiation therapy: A systematic scoping review |
title_full | Men’s perceptions and preferences regarding prostate cancer radiation therapy: A systematic scoping review |
title_fullStr | Men’s perceptions and preferences regarding prostate cancer radiation therapy: A systematic scoping review |
title_full_unstemmed | Men’s perceptions and preferences regarding prostate cancer radiation therapy: A systematic scoping review |
title_short | Men’s perceptions and preferences regarding prostate cancer radiation therapy: A systematic scoping review |
title_sort | men’s perceptions and preferences regarding prostate cancer radiation therapy: a systematic scoping review |
topic | Review Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9636414/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36345391 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ctro.2022.10.007 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT brownamy mensperceptionsandpreferencesregardingprostatecancerradiationtherapyasystematicscopingreview AT yimjackie mensperceptionsandpreferencesregardingprostatecancerradiationtherapyasystematicscopingreview AT jonesscott mensperceptionsandpreferencesregardingprostatecancerradiationtherapyasystematicscopingreview AT tanalex mensperceptionsandpreferencesregardingprostatecancerradiationtherapyasystematicscopingreview AT callanderemily mensperceptionsandpreferencesregardingprostatecancerradiationtherapyasystematicscopingreview AT wattkerrianne mensperceptionsandpreferencesregardingprostatecancerradiationtherapyasystematicscopingreview AT deabreulourencorichard mensperceptionsandpreferencesregardingprostatecancerradiationtherapyasystematicscopingreview AT paintilley mensperceptionsandpreferencesregardingprostatecancerradiationtherapyasystematicscopingreview |