Cargando…

SARS-CoV-2 and the role of close contact in transmission: a systematic review

Background: SARS-CoV-2 transmission has been reported to be associated with close contact with infected individuals. However, the mechanistic pathway for transmission in close contact settings is unclear. Our objective was to identify, appraise and summarise the evidence from studies assessing the r...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Onakpoya, Igho J., Heneghan, Carl J., Spencer, Elizabeth A., Brassey, Jon, Plüddemann, Annette, Evans, David H., Conly, John M., Jefferson, Tom
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: F1000 Research Limited 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9636487/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36398277
http://dx.doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.52439.3
_version_ 1784824955045675008
author Onakpoya, Igho J.
Heneghan, Carl J.
Spencer, Elizabeth A.
Brassey, Jon
Plüddemann, Annette
Evans, David H.
Conly, John M.
Jefferson, Tom
author_facet Onakpoya, Igho J.
Heneghan, Carl J.
Spencer, Elizabeth A.
Brassey, Jon
Plüddemann, Annette
Evans, David H.
Conly, John M.
Jefferson, Tom
author_sort Onakpoya, Igho J.
collection PubMed
description Background: SARS-CoV-2 transmission has been reported to be associated with close contact with infected individuals. However, the mechanistic pathway for transmission in close contact settings is unclear. Our objective was to identify, appraise and summarise the evidence from studies assessing the role of close contact in SARS-CoV-2 transmission.  Methods: This review is part of an Open Evidence Review on Transmission Dynamics of SARS-CoV-2. We conduct ongoing searches using WHO Covid-19 Database, LitCovid, medRxiv, PubMed and Google Scholar; assess study quality based on the QUADAS-2 criteria and report important findings on an ongoing basis. Results: We included 278 studies: 258 primary studies and 20 systematic reviews. The settings for primary studies were predominantly in home/quarantine facilities (39.5%) and acute care hospitals (12%). The overall reporting quality of the studies was low-to-moderate. There was significant heterogeneity in design and methodology. The frequency of attack rates (PCR testing) varied between 2.1-75%; attack rates were highest in prison and wedding venues, and in households. The frequency of secondary attack rates was 0.3-100% with rates highest in home/quarantine settings. Three studies showed no transmission if the index case was a recurrent infection. Viral culture was performed in four studies of which three found replication-competent virus; culture results were negative where index cases had recurrent infections. Eighteen studies performed genomic sequencing with phylogenetic analysis – the completeness of genomic similarity ranged from 77-100%. Findings from systematic reviews showed that children were significantly less likely to transmit SARS-CoV-2 and household contact was associated with a significantly increased risk of infection. Conclusions: The evidence from published studies demonstrates that SARS-CoV-2 can be transmitted in close contact settings. The risk of transmission is greater in household contacts. There was a wide variation in methodology. Standardized guidelines for reporting transmission in close contact settings should be developed.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9636487
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher F1000 Research Limited
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-96364872022-11-16 SARS-CoV-2 and the role of close contact in transmission: a systematic review Onakpoya, Igho J. Heneghan, Carl J. Spencer, Elizabeth A. Brassey, Jon Plüddemann, Annette Evans, David H. Conly, John M. Jefferson, Tom F1000Res Systematic Review Background: SARS-CoV-2 transmission has been reported to be associated with close contact with infected individuals. However, the mechanistic pathway for transmission in close contact settings is unclear. Our objective was to identify, appraise and summarise the evidence from studies assessing the role of close contact in SARS-CoV-2 transmission.  Methods: This review is part of an Open Evidence Review on Transmission Dynamics of SARS-CoV-2. We conduct ongoing searches using WHO Covid-19 Database, LitCovid, medRxiv, PubMed and Google Scholar; assess study quality based on the QUADAS-2 criteria and report important findings on an ongoing basis. Results: We included 278 studies: 258 primary studies and 20 systematic reviews. The settings for primary studies were predominantly in home/quarantine facilities (39.5%) and acute care hospitals (12%). The overall reporting quality of the studies was low-to-moderate. There was significant heterogeneity in design and methodology. The frequency of attack rates (PCR testing) varied between 2.1-75%; attack rates were highest in prison and wedding venues, and in households. The frequency of secondary attack rates was 0.3-100% with rates highest in home/quarantine settings. Three studies showed no transmission if the index case was a recurrent infection. Viral culture was performed in four studies of which three found replication-competent virus; culture results were negative where index cases had recurrent infections. Eighteen studies performed genomic sequencing with phylogenetic analysis – the completeness of genomic similarity ranged from 77-100%. Findings from systematic reviews showed that children were significantly less likely to transmit SARS-CoV-2 and household contact was associated with a significantly increased risk of infection. Conclusions: The evidence from published studies demonstrates that SARS-CoV-2 can be transmitted in close contact settings. The risk of transmission is greater in household contacts. There was a wide variation in methodology. Standardized guidelines for reporting transmission in close contact settings should be developed. F1000 Research Limited 2022-11-17 /pmc/articles/PMC9636487/ /pubmed/36398277 http://dx.doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.52439.3 Text en Copyright: © 2022 Onakpoya IJ et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Systematic Review
Onakpoya, Igho J.
Heneghan, Carl J.
Spencer, Elizabeth A.
Brassey, Jon
Plüddemann, Annette
Evans, David H.
Conly, John M.
Jefferson, Tom
SARS-CoV-2 and the role of close contact in transmission: a systematic review
title SARS-CoV-2 and the role of close contact in transmission: a systematic review
title_full SARS-CoV-2 and the role of close contact in transmission: a systematic review
title_fullStr SARS-CoV-2 and the role of close contact in transmission: a systematic review
title_full_unstemmed SARS-CoV-2 and the role of close contact in transmission: a systematic review
title_short SARS-CoV-2 and the role of close contact in transmission: a systematic review
title_sort sars-cov-2 and the role of close contact in transmission: a systematic review
topic Systematic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9636487/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36398277
http://dx.doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.52439.3
work_keys_str_mv AT onakpoyaighoj sarscov2andtheroleofclosecontactintransmissionasystematicreview
AT heneghancarlj sarscov2andtheroleofclosecontactintransmissionasystematicreview
AT spencerelizabetha sarscov2andtheroleofclosecontactintransmissionasystematicreview
AT brasseyjon sarscov2andtheroleofclosecontactintransmissionasystematicreview
AT pluddemannannette sarscov2andtheroleofclosecontactintransmissionasystematicreview
AT evansdavidh sarscov2andtheroleofclosecontactintransmissionasystematicreview
AT conlyjohnm sarscov2andtheroleofclosecontactintransmissionasystematicreview
AT jeffersontom sarscov2andtheroleofclosecontactintransmissionasystematicreview