Cargando…
Robot-assisted early mobilization of intensive care patients: a feasibility study protocol
BACKGROUND: Early mobilization positively influences the outcome of critically ill patients, yet in clinical practice, the implementation is sometimes challenging. In this study, an adaptive robotic assistance system will be used for early mobilization in intensive care units. The study aims to eval...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9636622/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36333746 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40814-022-01191-0 |
_version_ | 1784824986958036992 |
---|---|
author | Warmbein, Angelika Schroeder, Ines Mehler-Klamt, Amrei Rathgeber, Ivanka Huber, Jana Scharf, Christina Hübner, Lucas Gutmann, Marcus Biebl, Johanna Lorenz, Andreas Kraft, Eduard Zoller, Michael Eberl, Inge Fischer, Uli |
author_facet | Warmbein, Angelika Schroeder, Ines Mehler-Klamt, Amrei Rathgeber, Ivanka Huber, Jana Scharf, Christina Hübner, Lucas Gutmann, Marcus Biebl, Johanna Lorenz, Andreas Kraft, Eduard Zoller, Michael Eberl, Inge Fischer, Uli |
author_sort | Warmbein, Angelika |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Early mobilization positively influences the outcome of critically ill patients, yet in clinical practice, the implementation is sometimes challenging. In this study, an adaptive robotic assistance system will be used for early mobilization in intensive care units. The study aims to evaluate the experience of the mobilizing professionals and the general feasibility of implementing robotic assistance for mobilization in intensive care as well as the effects on patient outcomes as a secondary outcome. METHODS: The study is single-centric, prospective, and interventional and follows a longitudinal study design. To evaluate the feasibility of robotic-assisted early mobilization, the number of patients included, the number of performed VEM (very early mobilization) sessions, and the number and type of adverse events will be collected. The behavior and experience of mobilizing professionals will be evaluated using standardized observations (n > 90) and episodic interviews (n > 36) before implementation, shortly after, and in routine. Patient outcomes such as duration of mechanical ventilation, loss of muscle mass, and physical activity will be measured and compared with a historical patient population. Approximately 30 patients will be included. DISCUSSION: The study will provide information about patient outcomes, feasibility, and the experience of mobilizing professionals. It will show whether robotic systems can increase the early mobilization frequency of critically ill patients. Within ICU structures, early mobilization as therapy could become more of a focus. Effects on the mobilizing professionals such as increased motivation, physical relief, or stress will be evaluated. In addition, this study will focus on whether current structures allow following the recommendation of mobilizing patients twice a day for at least 20 min. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT05071248. Date: 2021/10/21 |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9636622 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-96366222022-11-06 Robot-assisted early mobilization of intensive care patients: a feasibility study protocol Warmbein, Angelika Schroeder, Ines Mehler-Klamt, Amrei Rathgeber, Ivanka Huber, Jana Scharf, Christina Hübner, Lucas Gutmann, Marcus Biebl, Johanna Lorenz, Andreas Kraft, Eduard Zoller, Michael Eberl, Inge Fischer, Uli Pilot Feasibility Stud Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Early mobilization positively influences the outcome of critically ill patients, yet in clinical practice, the implementation is sometimes challenging. In this study, an adaptive robotic assistance system will be used for early mobilization in intensive care units. The study aims to evaluate the experience of the mobilizing professionals and the general feasibility of implementing robotic assistance for mobilization in intensive care as well as the effects on patient outcomes as a secondary outcome. METHODS: The study is single-centric, prospective, and interventional and follows a longitudinal study design. To evaluate the feasibility of robotic-assisted early mobilization, the number of patients included, the number of performed VEM (very early mobilization) sessions, and the number and type of adverse events will be collected. The behavior and experience of mobilizing professionals will be evaluated using standardized observations (n > 90) and episodic interviews (n > 36) before implementation, shortly after, and in routine. Patient outcomes such as duration of mechanical ventilation, loss of muscle mass, and physical activity will be measured and compared with a historical patient population. Approximately 30 patients will be included. DISCUSSION: The study will provide information about patient outcomes, feasibility, and the experience of mobilizing professionals. It will show whether robotic systems can increase the early mobilization frequency of critically ill patients. Within ICU structures, early mobilization as therapy could become more of a focus. Effects on the mobilizing professionals such as increased motivation, physical relief, or stress will be evaluated. In addition, this study will focus on whether current structures allow following the recommendation of mobilizing patients twice a day for at least 20 min. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT05071248. Date: 2021/10/21 BioMed Central 2022-11-05 /pmc/articles/PMC9636622/ /pubmed/36333746 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40814-022-01191-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Study Protocol Warmbein, Angelika Schroeder, Ines Mehler-Klamt, Amrei Rathgeber, Ivanka Huber, Jana Scharf, Christina Hübner, Lucas Gutmann, Marcus Biebl, Johanna Lorenz, Andreas Kraft, Eduard Zoller, Michael Eberl, Inge Fischer, Uli Robot-assisted early mobilization of intensive care patients: a feasibility study protocol |
title | Robot-assisted early mobilization of intensive care patients: a feasibility study protocol |
title_full | Robot-assisted early mobilization of intensive care patients: a feasibility study protocol |
title_fullStr | Robot-assisted early mobilization of intensive care patients: a feasibility study protocol |
title_full_unstemmed | Robot-assisted early mobilization of intensive care patients: a feasibility study protocol |
title_short | Robot-assisted early mobilization of intensive care patients: a feasibility study protocol |
title_sort | robot-assisted early mobilization of intensive care patients: a feasibility study protocol |
topic | Study Protocol |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9636622/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36333746 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40814-022-01191-0 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT warmbeinangelika robotassistedearlymobilizationofintensivecarepatientsafeasibilitystudyprotocol AT schroederines robotassistedearlymobilizationofintensivecarepatientsafeasibilitystudyprotocol AT mehlerklamtamrei robotassistedearlymobilizationofintensivecarepatientsafeasibilitystudyprotocol AT rathgeberivanka robotassistedearlymobilizationofintensivecarepatientsafeasibilitystudyprotocol AT huberjana robotassistedearlymobilizationofintensivecarepatientsafeasibilitystudyprotocol AT scharfchristina robotassistedearlymobilizationofintensivecarepatientsafeasibilitystudyprotocol AT hubnerlucas robotassistedearlymobilizationofintensivecarepatientsafeasibilitystudyprotocol AT gutmannmarcus robotassistedearlymobilizationofintensivecarepatientsafeasibilitystudyprotocol AT biebljohanna robotassistedearlymobilizationofintensivecarepatientsafeasibilitystudyprotocol AT lorenzandreas robotassistedearlymobilizationofintensivecarepatientsafeasibilitystudyprotocol AT krafteduard robotassistedearlymobilizationofintensivecarepatientsafeasibilitystudyprotocol AT zollermichael robotassistedearlymobilizationofintensivecarepatientsafeasibilitystudyprotocol AT eberlinge robotassistedearlymobilizationofintensivecarepatientsafeasibilitystudyprotocol AT fischeruli robotassistedearlymobilizationofintensivecarepatientsafeasibilitystudyprotocol |