Cargando…

Comparison of the effects of lidocaine and amiodarone for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients with shockable rhythms: a retrospective observational study from a multicenter registry

BACKGROUND: Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) with shockable rhythms, including ventricular fibrillation and pulseless ventricular tachycardia, is associated with better prognosis and neurological outcome than OHCA due to other rhythms. Antiarrhythmic drugs, including lidocaine and amiodarone, a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kishihara, Yuki, Kashiura, Masahiro, Amagasa, Shunsuke, Fukushima, Fumihito, Yasuda, Hideto, Moriya, Takashi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9636706/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36335307
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12872-022-02920-2
_version_ 1784825009178411008
author Kishihara, Yuki
Kashiura, Masahiro
Amagasa, Shunsuke
Fukushima, Fumihito
Yasuda, Hideto
Moriya, Takashi
author_facet Kishihara, Yuki
Kashiura, Masahiro
Amagasa, Shunsuke
Fukushima, Fumihito
Yasuda, Hideto
Moriya, Takashi
author_sort Kishihara, Yuki
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) with shockable rhythms, including ventricular fibrillation and pulseless ventricular tachycardia, is associated with better prognosis and neurological outcome than OHCA due to other rhythms. Antiarrhythmic drugs, including lidocaine and amiodarone, are often used for defibrillation. This study aimed to compare the effects of lidocaine and amiodarone on the prognosis and neurological outcome of patients with OHCA due to shockable rhythms in a real-world setting. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective observational study using a multicenter OHCA registry of 91 participating hospitals in Japan. We included adult patients with shockable rhythms, such as ventricular fibrillation and pulseless ventricular tachycardia, who were administered either lidocaine or amiodarone. The primary outcome was 30-day survival, and the secondary outcome was a good neurological outcome at 30 days. We compared the effects of lidocaine and amiodarone for patients with OHCA due to shockable rhythms for these outcomes using logistic regression analysis after propensity score matching (PSM). RESULTS: Of the 51,199 patients registered in the OHCA registry, 1970 patients were analyzed. In total, 105 patients (5.3%) were administered lidocaine, and 1865 (94.7%) were administered amiodarone. After performing PSM with amiodarone used as the reference, the odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals of lidocaine use for 30-day survival and 30-day good neurological outcome were 1.44 (0.58–3.61) and 1.77 (0.59–5.29), respectively. CONCLUSION: The use of lidocaine and amiodarone for patients with OHCA due to shockable rhythms within a real-world setting showed no significant differences in short-term mortality or neurological outcome. There is no evidence that either amiodarone or lidocaine is superior in treatment; thus, either or both drugs could be administered. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12872-022-02920-2.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9636706
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-96367062022-11-06 Comparison of the effects of lidocaine and amiodarone for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients with shockable rhythms: a retrospective observational study from a multicenter registry Kishihara, Yuki Kashiura, Masahiro Amagasa, Shunsuke Fukushima, Fumihito Yasuda, Hideto Moriya, Takashi BMC Cardiovasc Disord Research Article BACKGROUND: Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) with shockable rhythms, including ventricular fibrillation and pulseless ventricular tachycardia, is associated with better prognosis and neurological outcome than OHCA due to other rhythms. Antiarrhythmic drugs, including lidocaine and amiodarone, are often used for defibrillation. This study aimed to compare the effects of lidocaine and amiodarone on the prognosis and neurological outcome of patients with OHCA due to shockable rhythms in a real-world setting. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective observational study using a multicenter OHCA registry of 91 participating hospitals in Japan. We included adult patients with shockable rhythms, such as ventricular fibrillation and pulseless ventricular tachycardia, who were administered either lidocaine or amiodarone. The primary outcome was 30-day survival, and the secondary outcome was a good neurological outcome at 30 days. We compared the effects of lidocaine and amiodarone for patients with OHCA due to shockable rhythms for these outcomes using logistic regression analysis after propensity score matching (PSM). RESULTS: Of the 51,199 patients registered in the OHCA registry, 1970 patients were analyzed. In total, 105 patients (5.3%) were administered lidocaine, and 1865 (94.7%) were administered amiodarone. After performing PSM with amiodarone used as the reference, the odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals of lidocaine use for 30-day survival and 30-day good neurological outcome were 1.44 (0.58–3.61) and 1.77 (0.59–5.29), respectively. CONCLUSION: The use of lidocaine and amiodarone for patients with OHCA due to shockable rhythms within a real-world setting showed no significant differences in short-term mortality or neurological outcome. There is no evidence that either amiodarone or lidocaine is superior in treatment; thus, either or both drugs could be administered. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12872-022-02920-2. BioMed Central 2022-11-05 /pmc/articles/PMC9636706/ /pubmed/36335307 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12872-022-02920-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
Kishihara, Yuki
Kashiura, Masahiro
Amagasa, Shunsuke
Fukushima, Fumihito
Yasuda, Hideto
Moriya, Takashi
Comparison of the effects of lidocaine and amiodarone for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients with shockable rhythms: a retrospective observational study from a multicenter registry
title Comparison of the effects of lidocaine and amiodarone for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients with shockable rhythms: a retrospective observational study from a multicenter registry
title_full Comparison of the effects of lidocaine and amiodarone for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients with shockable rhythms: a retrospective observational study from a multicenter registry
title_fullStr Comparison of the effects of lidocaine and amiodarone for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients with shockable rhythms: a retrospective observational study from a multicenter registry
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of the effects of lidocaine and amiodarone for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients with shockable rhythms: a retrospective observational study from a multicenter registry
title_short Comparison of the effects of lidocaine and amiodarone for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients with shockable rhythms: a retrospective observational study from a multicenter registry
title_sort comparison of the effects of lidocaine and amiodarone for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients with shockable rhythms: a retrospective observational study from a multicenter registry
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9636706/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36335307
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12872-022-02920-2
work_keys_str_mv AT kishiharayuki comparisonoftheeffectsoflidocaineandamiodaroneforoutofhospitalcardiacarrestpatientswithshockablerhythmsaretrospectiveobservationalstudyfromamulticenterregistry
AT kashiuramasahiro comparisonoftheeffectsoflidocaineandamiodaroneforoutofhospitalcardiacarrestpatientswithshockablerhythmsaretrospectiveobservationalstudyfromamulticenterregistry
AT amagasashunsuke comparisonoftheeffectsoflidocaineandamiodaroneforoutofhospitalcardiacarrestpatientswithshockablerhythmsaretrospectiveobservationalstudyfromamulticenterregistry
AT fukushimafumihito comparisonoftheeffectsoflidocaineandamiodaroneforoutofhospitalcardiacarrestpatientswithshockablerhythmsaretrospectiveobservationalstudyfromamulticenterregistry
AT yasudahideto comparisonoftheeffectsoflidocaineandamiodaroneforoutofhospitalcardiacarrestpatientswithshockablerhythmsaretrospectiveobservationalstudyfromamulticenterregistry
AT moriyatakashi comparisonoftheeffectsoflidocaineandamiodaroneforoutofhospitalcardiacarrestpatientswithshockablerhythmsaretrospectiveobservationalstudyfromamulticenterregistry