Cargando…

Analysis of risk factors related to extremely and very preterm birth: a retrospective study

BACKGROUND: Preterm birth is one of the main causes of perinatal morbidity and mortality and imposes a heavy burden on families and society. The aim of this study was to identify risk factors and analyze birth conditions and complications of newborns born at < 32 gestational weeks for extremely p...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ji, Xiaohong, Wu, Chengqian, Chen, Min, Wu, Lili, Li, Ting, Miao, Zhijing, Lv, Yan, Ding, Hongjuan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9636775/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36335328
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-022-05119-7
_version_ 1784825027018883072
author Ji, Xiaohong
Wu, Chengqian
Chen, Min
Wu, Lili
Li, Ting
Miao, Zhijing
Lv, Yan
Ding, Hongjuan
author_facet Ji, Xiaohong
Wu, Chengqian
Chen, Min
Wu, Lili
Li, Ting
Miao, Zhijing
Lv, Yan
Ding, Hongjuan
author_sort Ji, Xiaohong
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Preterm birth is one of the main causes of perinatal morbidity and mortality and imposes a heavy burden on families and society. The aim of this study was to identify risk factors and analyze birth conditions and complications of newborns born at < 32 gestational weeks for extremely preterm (EP) and very preterm (VP) birth in the clinic to further extend the gestational period. METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort study and collected data from 1598 pregnant women and 1660 premature newborns (excluding 229 premature babies who died due to severe illness and abandonment) admitted to the Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital Affiliated with Nanjing Medical University in China from 2016 to 2020. We compared women’s and newborns’ characteristics by t-tests and Chi-square tests for continuous and categorical variables, respectively. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to estimate the effects of risk factors on EP and VP birth. RESULTS: We identified 3 independent risk factors for EP birth: cervical incompetency (P < 0.001); multiple pregnancy (P < 0.01), primipara (P < 0.001). Additionally, we identified 4 independent risk factors for VP birth: gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) (P < 0.05), preterm premature rupture of membrane (PPROM) (P < 0.01), fetal intrauterine distress (P < 0.001), and hypertensive disorder complicating pregnancy (HDCP) (P < 0.001). In addition, pairwise comparisons revealed statistically significant differences in the incidence rates of neonatal pneumonia, bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD) and sepsis between the 28–28 + 6 and 29–29 + 6 weeks of gestation groups (P < 0.05). Compared with 28–28 + 6 weeks of gestation, neonatal complications were significantly more common at < 26 weeks of gestation (P < 0.05). The incidence rates of neonatal intracranial hemorrhage(NICH), patent ductus arteriosus(PDA), patent foramen ovale(PFO), pneumonia, BPD and sepsis were significantly higher in the 26–26 + 6 and 27–27 + 6 gestational weeks than in the 28–28 + 6 gestational weeks (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: PPROM, is the most common risk factor for EP and VP birth, and cervical insufficiency, multiple pregnancy, and primipara are independent risk factors for EP birth. Therefore, during pregnancy, attention should be devoted to the risk factors for PPROM, and reproductive tract infection should be actively prevented to reduce the occurrence of PPROM. Identifying the risk factors for cervical insufficiency, actively intervening before pregnancy, and cervical cervix ligation may be considered to reduce the occurrence of EP labor. For iatrogenic preterm birth, the advantages and disadvantages should be carefully weighed, and the gestational period should be extended beyond 28 weeks to enhance the safety of the mother and child and to improve the outcomes of preterm birth. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12884-022-05119-7.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9636775
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-96367752022-11-06 Analysis of risk factors related to extremely and very preterm birth: a retrospective study Ji, Xiaohong Wu, Chengqian Chen, Min Wu, Lili Li, Ting Miao, Zhijing Lv, Yan Ding, Hongjuan BMC Pregnancy Childbirth Research BACKGROUND: Preterm birth is one of the main causes of perinatal morbidity and mortality and imposes a heavy burden on families and society. The aim of this study was to identify risk factors and analyze birth conditions and complications of newborns born at < 32 gestational weeks for extremely preterm (EP) and very preterm (VP) birth in the clinic to further extend the gestational period. METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort study and collected data from 1598 pregnant women and 1660 premature newborns (excluding 229 premature babies who died due to severe illness and abandonment) admitted to the Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital Affiliated with Nanjing Medical University in China from 2016 to 2020. We compared women’s and newborns’ characteristics by t-tests and Chi-square tests for continuous and categorical variables, respectively. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to estimate the effects of risk factors on EP and VP birth. RESULTS: We identified 3 independent risk factors for EP birth: cervical incompetency (P < 0.001); multiple pregnancy (P < 0.01), primipara (P < 0.001). Additionally, we identified 4 independent risk factors for VP birth: gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) (P < 0.05), preterm premature rupture of membrane (PPROM) (P < 0.01), fetal intrauterine distress (P < 0.001), and hypertensive disorder complicating pregnancy (HDCP) (P < 0.001). In addition, pairwise comparisons revealed statistically significant differences in the incidence rates of neonatal pneumonia, bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD) and sepsis between the 28–28 + 6 and 29–29 + 6 weeks of gestation groups (P < 0.05). Compared with 28–28 + 6 weeks of gestation, neonatal complications were significantly more common at < 26 weeks of gestation (P < 0.05). The incidence rates of neonatal intracranial hemorrhage(NICH), patent ductus arteriosus(PDA), patent foramen ovale(PFO), pneumonia, BPD and sepsis were significantly higher in the 26–26 + 6 and 27–27 + 6 gestational weeks than in the 28–28 + 6 gestational weeks (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: PPROM, is the most common risk factor for EP and VP birth, and cervical insufficiency, multiple pregnancy, and primipara are independent risk factors for EP birth. Therefore, during pregnancy, attention should be devoted to the risk factors for PPROM, and reproductive tract infection should be actively prevented to reduce the occurrence of PPROM. Identifying the risk factors for cervical insufficiency, actively intervening before pregnancy, and cervical cervix ligation may be considered to reduce the occurrence of EP labor. For iatrogenic preterm birth, the advantages and disadvantages should be carefully weighed, and the gestational period should be extended beyond 28 weeks to enhance the safety of the mother and child and to improve the outcomes of preterm birth. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12884-022-05119-7. BioMed Central 2022-11-05 /pmc/articles/PMC9636775/ /pubmed/36335328 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-022-05119-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Ji, Xiaohong
Wu, Chengqian
Chen, Min
Wu, Lili
Li, Ting
Miao, Zhijing
Lv, Yan
Ding, Hongjuan
Analysis of risk factors related to extremely and very preterm birth: a retrospective study
title Analysis of risk factors related to extremely and very preterm birth: a retrospective study
title_full Analysis of risk factors related to extremely and very preterm birth: a retrospective study
title_fullStr Analysis of risk factors related to extremely and very preterm birth: a retrospective study
title_full_unstemmed Analysis of risk factors related to extremely and very preterm birth: a retrospective study
title_short Analysis of risk factors related to extremely and very preterm birth: a retrospective study
title_sort analysis of risk factors related to extremely and very preterm birth: a retrospective study
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9636775/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36335328
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-022-05119-7
work_keys_str_mv AT jixiaohong analysisofriskfactorsrelatedtoextremelyandverypretermbirtharetrospectivestudy
AT wuchengqian analysisofriskfactorsrelatedtoextremelyandverypretermbirtharetrospectivestudy
AT chenmin analysisofriskfactorsrelatedtoextremelyandverypretermbirtharetrospectivestudy
AT wulili analysisofriskfactorsrelatedtoextremelyandverypretermbirtharetrospectivestudy
AT liting analysisofriskfactorsrelatedtoextremelyandverypretermbirtharetrospectivestudy
AT miaozhijing analysisofriskfactorsrelatedtoextremelyandverypretermbirtharetrospectivestudy
AT lvyan analysisofriskfactorsrelatedtoextremelyandverypretermbirtharetrospectivestudy
AT dinghongjuan analysisofriskfactorsrelatedtoextremelyandverypretermbirtharetrospectivestudy