Cargando…

Aging and distractor resistance in working memory: Does emotional valence matter?

BACKGROUND: Emotional stimuli used as targets of working memory (WM) tasks can moderate age-related differences in WM performance, showing that aging is associated with reductions in negativity bias. This phenomenon is referred to as the positivity effect. However, there is little research on whethe...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ding, Lin-jie, Zhang, Shao-shuai, Peng, Ming, Li, Xu
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9636820/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36333780
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40359-022-00953-y
_version_ 1784825038727282688
author Ding, Lin-jie
Zhang, Shao-shuai
Peng, Ming
Li, Xu
author_facet Ding, Lin-jie
Zhang, Shao-shuai
Peng, Ming
Li, Xu
author_sort Ding, Lin-jie
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Emotional stimuli used as targets of working memory (WM) tasks can moderate age-related differences in WM performance, showing that aging is associated with reductions in negativity bias. This phenomenon is referred to as the positivity effect. However, there is little research on whether emotional distractors have a similar moderating effect. Moreover, the underlying neural mechanism of this effect has not been studied. In this study, we examined the behavioral and neurophysiological basis for age differences in resistance to emotional distractors within WM. METHODS: Older adults (n = 30, ages 60–74) and young adults (n = 35, ages 19–26) performed a 2-back task in which a digit was superimposed on a face with a happy, angry, or neutral expression as a distractor. Event-related potential (ERP) was simultaneously recorded to assess P2, N2, and later positive potential (LPP) amplitudes. RESULTS: Older adults were less accurate and slower than young adults on the WM task. Moreover, the results demonstrated a significant interaction between age and emotional valence on response accuracy, young adults' performance was worse when the distractor was neutral or positive than when it was negative, but there was no effect of the emotional valence of distractors on older adults’ WM performance. ERP analyses revealed greater P2 amplitude in older adults than young adults, regardless of the emotional valence of distractors. However, older adults and young adults did not differ on N2 or LPP amplitude, and negative distractors elicited greater N2 than positive distractors in both age groups. CONCLUSIONS: The behavioral findings provided evidence of age-related reductions in negativity bias. Thus, the behavioral measures indicated a positivity effect in WM. However, the ERP results did not show this same interaction. These discrepant results raise questions about whether and to what extent older and young adults differ in controlling the effect of emotional distractors in WM. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s40359-022-00953-y.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9636820
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-96368202022-11-06 Aging and distractor resistance in working memory: Does emotional valence matter? Ding, Lin-jie Zhang, Shao-shuai Peng, Ming Li, Xu BMC Psychol Research BACKGROUND: Emotional stimuli used as targets of working memory (WM) tasks can moderate age-related differences in WM performance, showing that aging is associated with reductions in negativity bias. This phenomenon is referred to as the positivity effect. However, there is little research on whether emotional distractors have a similar moderating effect. Moreover, the underlying neural mechanism of this effect has not been studied. In this study, we examined the behavioral and neurophysiological basis for age differences in resistance to emotional distractors within WM. METHODS: Older adults (n = 30, ages 60–74) and young adults (n = 35, ages 19–26) performed a 2-back task in which a digit was superimposed on a face with a happy, angry, or neutral expression as a distractor. Event-related potential (ERP) was simultaneously recorded to assess P2, N2, and later positive potential (LPP) amplitudes. RESULTS: Older adults were less accurate and slower than young adults on the WM task. Moreover, the results demonstrated a significant interaction between age and emotional valence on response accuracy, young adults' performance was worse when the distractor was neutral or positive than when it was negative, but there was no effect of the emotional valence of distractors on older adults’ WM performance. ERP analyses revealed greater P2 amplitude in older adults than young adults, regardless of the emotional valence of distractors. However, older adults and young adults did not differ on N2 or LPP amplitude, and negative distractors elicited greater N2 than positive distractors in both age groups. CONCLUSIONS: The behavioral findings provided evidence of age-related reductions in negativity bias. Thus, the behavioral measures indicated a positivity effect in WM. However, the ERP results did not show this same interaction. These discrepant results raise questions about whether and to what extent older and young adults differ in controlling the effect of emotional distractors in WM. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s40359-022-00953-y. BioMed Central 2022-11-04 /pmc/articles/PMC9636820/ /pubmed/36333780 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40359-022-00953-y Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Ding, Lin-jie
Zhang, Shao-shuai
Peng, Ming
Li, Xu
Aging and distractor resistance in working memory: Does emotional valence matter?
title Aging and distractor resistance in working memory: Does emotional valence matter?
title_full Aging and distractor resistance in working memory: Does emotional valence matter?
title_fullStr Aging and distractor resistance in working memory: Does emotional valence matter?
title_full_unstemmed Aging and distractor resistance in working memory: Does emotional valence matter?
title_short Aging and distractor resistance in working memory: Does emotional valence matter?
title_sort aging and distractor resistance in working memory: does emotional valence matter?
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9636820/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36333780
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40359-022-00953-y
work_keys_str_mv AT dinglinjie aginganddistractorresistanceinworkingmemorydoesemotionalvalencematter
AT zhangshaoshuai aginganddistractorresistanceinworkingmemorydoesemotionalvalencematter
AT pengming aginganddistractorresistanceinworkingmemorydoesemotionalvalencematter
AT lixu aginganddistractorresistanceinworkingmemorydoesemotionalvalencematter