Cargando…

Cochlear Implants: What the Neurosurgeon Needs to Know

Patients with cochlear implants (CIs) commonly undergo neurosurgical interventions for concurrent pathologies. The neurosurgeon must be aware of the limitations these devices place on treating these patients and all pertinent interactions CIs have with common neurosurgical instruments and procedures...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Obeidallah, Aisha S, Hamad, Mousa K, Holland, Ryan M, Cohen, Alan R, Kobets, Andrew J
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cureus 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9636986/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36381735
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.29998
Descripción
Sumario:Patients with cochlear implants (CIs) commonly undergo neurosurgical interventions for concurrent pathologies. The neurosurgeon must be aware of the limitations these devices place on treating these patients and all pertinent interactions CIs have with common neurosurgical instruments and procedures. A literature search was performed utilizing the terms “cochlear implant” and “neurosurgery” or “neurosurgical” and all associated iterations. We reviewed the abstracts of 146 generated reports and eight published papers discussing the interaction and limitations of CI use in different neurosurgical procedures. Five realms were identified in which a CI may potentially interfere with standard neurosurgical care: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), radiotherapy, deep brain stimulation (DBS), intraventricular shunt placement, and intraoperative neuromonitoring (IONM). First, MRI use with CIs is limited due to thermal injury risk, imaging disruption, and implant damage. Secondly, high-dose >50 Gy single-fraction linear accelerator-based radiosurgery has been demonstrated to result in a loss of radio frequency link range in CIs, interfering with their function. Next, during surgery for DBS, the need for MRI and microelectrode recording requires CI magnet removal by neurotology and the surgeon must communicate with a non-hearing patient. Tunneling of shunts must accommodate CI position retroauricularly, if ipsilateral, and programmable valves must be placed >2 cm from the CI to prevent interference. Intraoperative neuromonitoring may produce voltages that interfere with CIs, and while monopolar cautery may pose the same risk, no study has proven this to date. Generally, bipolar cautery is safe and favored >1 cm from CIs. MRI use is limited in CI patients, although MRI-safer devices are in production. DBS electrodes may be successfully placed after CI magnet removal. Programmable shunt valves may be placed >2 cm away from CIs and radiosurgery <50 Gy has not demonstrated harm to these devices. IONM and monopolar cautery have not been demonstrated to directly affect CIs; however, more research is needed.