Cargando…

Technology-Dependent Rehabilitation Involving Action Observation and Movement Imagery for Adults with Stroke: Can It Work? Feasibility of Self-Led Therapy for Upper Limb Rehabilitation after Stroke

BACKGROUND: Motor (re)learning via technology-dependent therapy has the potential to complement traditional therapies available to older adults living with stroke after hospital discharge and increase therapy dose. To date, little is known about the feasibility of technology-dependent therapy in a h...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: McCormick, Sheree A., Ireland, Christopher, Yohannes, Abebaw M., Holmes, Paul S.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9637031/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36345552
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/8185893
_version_ 1784825084998844416
author McCormick, Sheree A.
Ireland, Christopher
Yohannes, Abebaw M.
Holmes, Paul S.
author_facet McCormick, Sheree A.
Ireland, Christopher
Yohannes, Abebaw M.
Holmes, Paul S.
author_sort McCormick, Sheree A.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Motor (re)learning via technology-dependent therapy has the potential to complement traditional therapies available to older adults living with stroke after hospital discharge and increase therapy dose. To date, little is known about the feasibility of technology-dependent therapy in a home setting for this population. OBJECTIVE: To develop a technology-dependent therapy that provides mental and physical training for older adults with stroke and assess feasibility. Specifically we ask, “Can it work”? DESIGN: Single group repeated measures. METHODS: 13 participants, aged 18 years and over, were recruited over a six-month period. All participants had mild upper limb impairment following a stoke and were no longer receiving intensive rehabilitation. All participants received 18 days of technology-dependent therapy in their own home. Information was gathered on recruitment and retention, usability, and suitability of outcome measures. RESULTS: 11 participants completed the study. The recruitment rate (number recruited/number canvassed; 10.7%) suggests 1907 participants would need to be canvassed to recruit the necessary sample size (n = 204) for a definitive trial designed to provide 90% power at 5% level of significance to detect a clinically meaningful difference of 5.7 points on the Action Research Arm Test. The usability of the application was rated as exceptional on the System Usability Scale. Effectiveness cannot be determined from this study; however, there was a trend for improvement in measures of upper limb function and emotional well-being. Limitations. The study was limited by a relatively small sample size and lack of control group. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated proof of concept of a technology-dependent therapy for upper limb rehabilitation following stroke. The data suggest a definitive trial is feasible, additional strategies to improve recruitment should be considered. Outcome measures aligned with the residual motor function of participants are required.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9637031
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Hindawi
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-96370312022-11-06 Technology-Dependent Rehabilitation Involving Action Observation and Movement Imagery for Adults with Stroke: Can It Work? Feasibility of Self-Led Therapy for Upper Limb Rehabilitation after Stroke McCormick, Sheree A. Ireland, Christopher Yohannes, Abebaw M. Holmes, Paul S. Stroke Res Treat Research Article BACKGROUND: Motor (re)learning via technology-dependent therapy has the potential to complement traditional therapies available to older adults living with stroke after hospital discharge and increase therapy dose. To date, little is known about the feasibility of technology-dependent therapy in a home setting for this population. OBJECTIVE: To develop a technology-dependent therapy that provides mental and physical training for older adults with stroke and assess feasibility. Specifically we ask, “Can it work”? DESIGN: Single group repeated measures. METHODS: 13 participants, aged 18 years and over, were recruited over a six-month period. All participants had mild upper limb impairment following a stoke and were no longer receiving intensive rehabilitation. All participants received 18 days of technology-dependent therapy in their own home. Information was gathered on recruitment and retention, usability, and suitability of outcome measures. RESULTS: 11 participants completed the study. The recruitment rate (number recruited/number canvassed; 10.7%) suggests 1907 participants would need to be canvassed to recruit the necessary sample size (n = 204) for a definitive trial designed to provide 90% power at 5% level of significance to detect a clinically meaningful difference of 5.7 points on the Action Research Arm Test. The usability of the application was rated as exceptional on the System Usability Scale. Effectiveness cannot be determined from this study; however, there was a trend for improvement in measures of upper limb function and emotional well-being. Limitations. The study was limited by a relatively small sample size and lack of control group. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated proof of concept of a technology-dependent therapy for upper limb rehabilitation following stroke. The data suggest a definitive trial is feasible, additional strategies to improve recruitment should be considered. Outcome measures aligned with the residual motor function of participants are required. Hindawi 2022-10-29 /pmc/articles/PMC9637031/ /pubmed/36345552 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/8185893 Text en Copyright © 2022 Sheree A. McCormick et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
McCormick, Sheree A.
Ireland, Christopher
Yohannes, Abebaw M.
Holmes, Paul S.
Technology-Dependent Rehabilitation Involving Action Observation and Movement Imagery for Adults with Stroke: Can It Work? Feasibility of Self-Led Therapy for Upper Limb Rehabilitation after Stroke
title Technology-Dependent Rehabilitation Involving Action Observation and Movement Imagery for Adults with Stroke: Can It Work? Feasibility of Self-Led Therapy for Upper Limb Rehabilitation after Stroke
title_full Technology-Dependent Rehabilitation Involving Action Observation and Movement Imagery for Adults with Stroke: Can It Work? Feasibility of Self-Led Therapy for Upper Limb Rehabilitation after Stroke
title_fullStr Technology-Dependent Rehabilitation Involving Action Observation and Movement Imagery for Adults with Stroke: Can It Work? Feasibility of Self-Led Therapy for Upper Limb Rehabilitation after Stroke
title_full_unstemmed Technology-Dependent Rehabilitation Involving Action Observation and Movement Imagery for Adults with Stroke: Can It Work? Feasibility of Self-Led Therapy for Upper Limb Rehabilitation after Stroke
title_short Technology-Dependent Rehabilitation Involving Action Observation and Movement Imagery for Adults with Stroke: Can It Work? Feasibility of Self-Led Therapy for Upper Limb Rehabilitation after Stroke
title_sort technology-dependent rehabilitation involving action observation and movement imagery for adults with stroke: can it work? feasibility of self-led therapy for upper limb rehabilitation after stroke
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9637031/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36345552
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/8185893
work_keys_str_mv AT mccormickshereea technologydependentrehabilitationinvolvingactionobservationandmovementimageryforadultswithstrokecanitworkfeasibilityofselfledtherapyforupperlimbrehabilitationafterstroke
AT irelandchristopher technologydependentrehabilitationinvolvingactionobservationandmovementimageryforadultswithstrokecanitworkfeasibilityofselfledtherapyforupperlimbrehabilitationafterstroke
AT yohannesabebawm technologydependentrehabilitationinvolvingactionobservationandmovementimageryforadultswithstrokecanitworkfeasibilityofselfledtherapyforupperlimbrehabilitationafterstroke
AT holmespauls technologydependentrehabilitationinvolvingactionobservationandmovementimageryforadultswithstrokecanitworkfeasibilityofselfledtherapyforupperlimbrehabilitationafterstroke