Cargando…
A colonial-nesting seabird shows no heart-rate response to drone-based population surveys
Aerial drones are increasingly being used as tools for ecological research and wildlife monitoring in hard-to-access study systems, such as in studies of colonial-nesting birds. Despite their many advantages over traditional survey methods, there remains concerns about possible disturbance effects t...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9637139/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36335150 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-22492-7 |
_version_ | 1784825115631943680 |
---|---|
author | Geldart, Erica A. Barnas, Andrew F. Semeniuk, Christina A. D. Gilchrist, H. Grant Harris, Christopher M. Love, Oliver P. |
author_facet | Geldart, Erica A. Barnas, Andrew F. Semeniuk, Christina A. D. Gilchrist, H. Grant Harris, Christopher M. Love, Oliver P. |
author_sort | Geldart, Erica A. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Aerial drones are increasingly being used as tools for ecological research and wildlife monitoring in hard-to-access study systems, such as in studies of colonial-nesting birds. Despite their many advantages over traditional survey methods, there remains concerns about possible disturbance effects that standard drone survey protocols may have on bird colonies. There is a particular gap in the study of their influence on physiological measures of stress. We measured heart rates of incubating female common eider ducks (Somateria mollissima) to determine whether our drone-based population survey affected them. To do so, we used heart-rate recorders placed in nests to quantify their heart rate in response to a quadcopter drone flying transects 30 m above the nesting colony. Eider heart rate did not change from baseline (measured in the absence of drone survey flights) by a drone flying at a fixed altitude and varying horizontal distances from the bird. Our findings suggest that carefully planned drone-based surveys of focal species have the potential to be carried out without causing physiological impacts among colonial-nesting eiders. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9637139 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-96371392022-11-07 A colonial-nesting seabird shows no heart-rate response to drone-based population surveys Geldart, Erica A. Barnas, Andrew F. Semeniuk, Christina A. D. Gilchrist, H. Grant Harris, Christopher M. Love, Oliver P. Sci Rep Article Aerial drones are increasingly being used as tools for ecological research and wildlife monitoring in hard-to-access study systems, such as in studies of colonial-nesting birds. Despite their many advantages over traditional survey methods, there remains concerns about possible disturbance effects that standard drone survey protocols may have on bird colonies. There is a particular gap in the study of their influence on physiological measures of stress. We measured heart rates of incubating female common eider ducks (Somateria mollissima) to determine whether our drone-based population survey affected them. To do so, we used heart-rate recorders placed in nests to quantify their heart rate in response to a quadcopter drone flying transects 30 m above the nesting colony. Eider heart rate did not change from baseline (measured in the absence of drone survey flights) by a drone flying at a fixed altitude and varying horizontal distances from the bird. Our findings suggest that carefully planned drone-based surveys of focal species have the potential to be carried out without causing physiological impacts among colonial-nesting eiders. Nature Publishing Group UK 2022-11-05 /pmc/articles/PMC9637139/ /pubmed/36335150 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-22492-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Article Geldart, Erica A. Barnas, Andrew F. Semeniuk, Christina A. D. Gilchrist, H. Grant Harris, Christopher M. Love, Oliver P. A colonial-nesting seabird shows no heart-rate response to drone-based population surveys |
title | A colonial-nesting seabird shows no heart-rate response to drone-based population surveys |
title_full | A colonial-nesting seabird shows no heart-rate response to drone-based population surveys |
title_fullStr | A colonial-nesting seabird shows no heart-rate response to drone-based population surveys |
title_full_unstemmed | A colonial-nesting seabird shows no heart-rate response to drone-based population surveys |
title_short | A colonial-nesting seabird shows no heart-rate response to drone-based population surveys |
title_sort | colonial-nesting seabird shows no heart-rate response to drone-based population surveys |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9637139/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36335150 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-22492-7 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT geldartericaa acolonialnestingseabirdshowsnoheartrateresponsetodronebasedpopulationsurveys AT barnasandrewf acolonialnestingseabirdshowsnoheartrateresponsetodronebasedpopulationsurveys AT semeniukchristinaad acolonialnestingseabirdshowsnoheartrateresponsetodronebasedpopulationsurveys AT gilchristhgrant acolonialnestingseabirdshowsnoheartrateresponsetodronebasedpopulationsurveys AT harrischristopherm acolonialnestingseabirdshowsnoheartrateresponsetodronebasedpopulationsurveys AT loveoliverp acolonialnestingseabirdshowsnoheartrateresponsetodronebasedpopulationsurveys AT geldartericaa colonialnestingseabirdshowsnoheartrateresponsetodronebasedpopulationsurveys AT barnasandrewf colonialnestingseabirdshowsnoheartrateresponsetodronebasedpopulationsurveys AT semeniukchristinaad colonialnestingseabirdshowsnoheartrateresponsetodronebasedpopulationsurveys AT gilchristhgrant colonialnestingseabirdshowsnoheartrateresponsetodronebasedpopulationsurveys AT harrischristopherm colonialnestingseabirdshowsnoheartrateresponsetodronebasedpopulationsurveys AT loveoliverp colonialnestingseabirdshowsnoheartrateresponsetodronebasedpopulationsurveys |