Cargando…

A colonial-nesting seabird shows no heart-rate response to drone-based population surveys

Aerial drones are increasingly being used as tools for ecological research and wildlife monitoring in hard-to-access study systems, such as in studies of colonial-nesting birds. Despite their many advantages over traditional survey methods, there remains concerns about possible disturbance effects t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Geldart, Erica A., Barnas, Andrew F., Semeniuk, Christina A. D., Gilchrist, H. Grant, Harris, Christopher M., Love, Oliver P.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9637139/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36335150
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-22492-7
_version_ 1784825115631943680
author Geldart, Erica A.
Barnas, Andrew F.
Semeniuk, Christina A. D.
Gilchrist, H. Grant
Harris, Christopher M.
Love, Oliver P.
author_facet Geldart, Erica A.
Barnas, Andrew F.
Semeniuk, Christina A. D.
Gilchrist, H. Grant
Harris, Christopher M.
Love, Oliver P.
author_sort Geldart, Erica A.
collection PubMed
description Aerial drones are increasingly being used as tools for ecological research and wildlife monitoring in hard-to-access study systems, such as in studies of colonial-nesting birds. Despite their many advantages over traditional survey methods, there remains concerns about possible disturbance effects that standard drone survey protocols may have on bird colonies. There is a particular gap in the study of their influence on physiological measures of stress. We measured heart rates of incubating female common eider ducks (Somateria mollissima) to determine whether our drone-based population survey affected them. To do so, we used heart-rate recorders placed in nests to quantify their heart rate in response to a quadcopter drone flying transects 30 m above the nesting colony. Eider heart rate did not change from baseline (measured in the absence of drone survey flights) by a drone flying at a fixed altitude and varying horizontal distances from the bird. Our findings suggest that carefully planned drone-based surveys of focal species have the potential to be carried out without causing physiological impacts among colonial-nesting eiders.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9637139
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-96371392022-11-07 A colonial-nesting seabird shows no heart-rate response to drone-based population surveys Geldart, Erica A. Barnas, Andrew F. Semeniuk, Christina A. D. Gilchrist, H. Grant Harris, Christopher M. Love, Oliver P. Sci Rep Article Aerial drones are increasingly being used as tools for ecological research and wildlife monitoring in hard-to-access study systems, such as in studies of colonial-nesting birds. Despite their many advantages over traditional survey methods, there remains concerns about possible disturbance effects that standard drone survey protocols may have on bird colonies. There is a particular gap in the study of their influence on physiological measures of stress. We measured heart rates of incubating female common eider ducks (Somateria mollissima) to determine whether our drone-based population survey affected them. To do so, we used heart-rate recorders placed in nests to quantify their heart rate in response to a quadcopter drone flying transects 30 m above the nesting colony. Eider heart rate did not change from baseline (measured in the absence of drone survey flights) by a drone flying at a fixed altitude and varying horizontal distances from the bird. Our findings suggest that carefully planned drone-based surveys of focal species have the potential to be carried out without causing physiological impacts among colonial-nesting eiders. Nature Publishing Group UK 2022-11-05 /pmc/articles/PMC9637139/ /pubmed/36335150 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-22492-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
Geldart, Erica A.
Barnas, Andrew F.
Semeniuk, Christina A. D.
Gilchrist, H. Grant
Harris, Christopher M.
Love, Oliver P.
A colonial-nesting seabird shows no heart-rate response to drone-based population surveys
title A colonial-nesting seabird shows no heart-rate response to drone-based population surveys
title_full A colonial-nesting seabird shows no heart-rate response to drone-based population surveys
title_fullStr A colonial-nesting seabird shows no heart-rate response to drone-based population surveys
title_full_unstemmed A colonial-nesting seabird shows no heart-rate response to drone-based population surveys
title_short A colonial-nesting seabird shows no heart-rate response to drone-based population surveys
title_sort colonial-nesting seabird shows no heart-rate response to drone-based population surveys
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9637139/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36335150
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-22492-7
work_keys_str_mv AT geldartericaa acolonialnestingseabirdshowsnoheartrateresponsetodronebasedpopulationsurveys
AT barnasandrewf acolonialnestingseabirdshowsnoheartrateresponsetodronebasedpopulationsurveys
AT semeniukchristinaad acolonialnestingseabirdshowsnoheartrateresponsetodronebasedpopulationsurveys
AT gilchristhgrant acolonialnestingseabirdshowsnoheartrateresponsetodronebasedpopulationsurveys
AT harrischristopherm acolonialnestingseabirdshowsnoheartrateresponsetodronebasedpopulationsurveys
AT loveoliverp acolonialnestingseabirdshowsnoheartrateresponsetodronebasedpopulationsurveys
AT geldartericaa colonialnestingseabirdshowsnoheartrateresponsetodronebasedpopulationsurveys
AT barnasandrewf colonialnestingseabirdshowsnoheartrateresponsetodronebasedpopulationsurveys
AT semeniukchristinaad colonialnestingseabirdshowsnoheartrateresponsetodronebasedpopulationsurveys
AT gilchristhgrant colonialnestingseabirdshowsnoheartrateresponsetodronebasedpopulationsurveys
AT harrischristopherm colonialnestingseabirdshowsnoheartrateresponsetodronebasedpopulationsurveys
AT loveoliverp colonialnestingseabirdshowsnoheartrateresponsetodronebasedpopulationsurveys