Cargando…

Patient-reported functional outcome measures and treatment choice for prostate cancer

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to describe changes in patient-reported functional outcome measures (PROMs) comparing pre-treatment and 12 months after radical prostatectomy (RP), external beam radiation therapy (EBRT), brachytherapy and active surveillance (AS). METHODS: Men enrolled from 201...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tiruye, Tenaw, O’Callaghan, Michael, Moretti, Kim, Jay, Alex, Higgs, Braden, Santoro, Kerry, Boyle, Terry, Ettridge, Kerry, Beckmann, Kerri
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9637295/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36335325
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12894-022-01117-1
_version_ 1784825153169915904
author Tiruye, Tenaw
O’Callaghan, Michael
Moretti, Kim
Jay, Alex
Higgs, Braden
Santoro, Kerry
Boyle, Terry
Ettridge, Kerry
Beckmann, Kerri
author_facet Tiruye, Tenaw
O’Callaghan, Michael
Moretti, Kim
Jay, Alex
Higgs, Braden
Santoro, Kerry
Boyle, Terry
Ettridge, Kerry
Beckmann, Kerri
author_sort Tiruye, Tenaw
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to describe changes in patient-reported functional outcome measures (PROMs) comparing pre-treatment and 12 months after radical prostatectomy (RP), external beam radiation therapy (EBRT), brachytherapy and active surveillance (AS). METHODS: Men enrolled from 2010 to 2019 in the South Australian Prostate Cancer Clinical Outcomes Collaborative registry a prospective clinical registry were studied. Urinary, bowel, and sexual functions were measured using Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite (EPIC-26) at baseline and 12 months post-treatment. Higher scores on the EPIC-26 indicate better function. Multivariable regression models were applied to compare differences in function and extent of bother by treatment. RESULTS: Of the 4926 eligible men, 57.0% underwent RP, 20.5% EBRT, 7.0% brachytherapy and 15.5% AS. While baseline urinary and bowel function varied little across treatment groups, sexual function differed greatly (adjusted mean scores: RP = 56.3, EBRT = 45.8, brachytherapy = 61.4, AS = 52.8; p < 0.001). Post-treatment urinary continence and sexual function declined in all treatment groups, with the greatest decline for sexual function after RP (adjusted mean score change − 28.9). After adjustment for baseline differences, post-treatment sexual function scores after EBRT (6.4; 95%CI, 0.9–12.0) and brachytherapy (17.4; 95%CI, 9.4–25.5) were higher than after RP. Likewise, urinary continence after EBRT (13.6; 95%CI, 9.0-18.2), brachytherapy (10.6; 95%CI, 3.9–17.3) and AS (10.6; 95%CI, 5.9–15.3) were higher than after RP. Conversely, EBRT was associated with lower bowel function (− 7.9; 95%CI, − 12.4 to − 3.5) than RP. EBRT and AS were associated with lower odds of sexual bother (OR 0.51; 95%CI, 0.29–0.89 and OR 0.60; 95%CI, 0.38–0.96, respectively), and EBRT with higher odds of bowel bother (OR 2.01; 95%CI, 1.23–3.29) compared with RP. CONCLUSION: The four common treatment approaches for prostate cancer were associated with different patterns of patient-reported functional outcomes, both pre- and 12 months post-treatment. However, after adjustment, RP was associated with a greater decline in urinary continence and sexual function than other treatments. This study underscores the importance of collecting baseline PROMs to interpret post-treatment functional outcomes. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12894-022-01117-1.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9637295
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-96372952022-11-07 Patient-reported functional outcome measures and treatment choice for prostate cancer Tiruye, Tenaw O’Callaghan, Michael Moretti, Kim Jay, Alex Higgs, Braden Santoro, Kerry Boyle, Terry Ettridge, Kerry Beckmann, Kerri BMC Urol Research BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to describe changes in patient-reported functional outcome measures (PROMs) comparing pre-treatment and 12 months after radical prostatectomy (RP), external beam radiation therapy (EBRT), brachytherapy and active surveillance (AS). METHODS: Men enrolled from 2010 to 2019 in the South Australian Prostate Cancer Clinical Outcomes Collaborative registry a prospective clinical registry were studied. Urinary, bowel, and sexual functions were measured using Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite (EPIC-26) at baseline and 12 months post-treatment. Higher scores on the EPIC-26 indicate better function. Multivariable regression models were applied to compare differences in function and extent of bother by treatment. RESULTS: Of the 4926 eligible men, 57.0% underwent RP, 20.5% EBRT, 7.0% brachytherapy and 15.5% AS. While baseline urinary and bowel function varied little across treatment groups, sexual function differed greatly (adjusted mean scores: RP = 56.3, EBRT = 45.8, brachytherapy = 61.4, AS = 52.8; p < 0.001). Post-treatment urinary continence and sexual function declined in all treatment groups, with the greatest decline for sexual function after RP (adjusted mean score change − 28.9). After adjustment for baseline differences, post-treatment sexual function scores after EBRT (6.4; 95%CI, 0.9–12.0) and brachytherapy (17.4; 95%CI, 9.4–25.5) were higher than after RP. Likewise, urinary continence after EBRT (13.6; 95%CI, 9.0-18.2), brachytherapy (10.6; 95%CI, 3.9–17.3) and AS (10.6; 95%CI, 5.9–15.3) were higher than after RP. Conversely, EBRT was associated with lower bowel function (− 7.9; 95%CI, − 12.4 to − 3.5) than RP. EBRT and AS were associated with lower odds of sexual bother (OR 0.51; 95%CI, 0.29–0.89 and OR 0.60; 95%CI, 0.38–0.96, respectively), and EBRT with higher odds of bowel bother (OR 2.01; 95%CI, 1.23–3.29) compared with RP. CONCLUSION: The four common treatment approaches for prostate cancer were associated with different patterns of patient-reported functional outcomes, both pre- and 12 months post-treatment. However, after adjustment, RP was associated with a greater decline in urinary continence and sexual function than other treatments. This study underscores the importance of collecting baseline PROMs to interpret post-treatment functional outcomes. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12894-022-01117-1. BioMed Central 2022-11-05 /pmc/articles/PMC9637295/ /pubmed/36335325 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12894-022-01117-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Tiruye, Tenaw
O’Callaghan, Michael
Moretti, Kim
Jay, Alex
Higgs, Braden
Santoro, Kerry
Boyle, Terry
Ettridge, Kerry
Beckmann, Kerri
Patient-reported functional outcome measures and treatment choice for prostate cancer
title Patient-reported functional outcome measures and treatment choice for prostate cancer
title_full Patient-reported functional outcome measures and treatment choice for prostate cancer
title_fullStr Patient-reported functional outcome measures and treatment choice for prostate cancer
title_full_unstemmed Patient-reported functional outcome measures and treatment choice for prostate cancer
title_short Patient-reported functional outcome measures and treatment choice for prostate cancer
title_sort patient-reported functional outcome measures and treatment choice for prostate cancer
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9637295/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36335325
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12894-022-01117-1
work_keys_str_mv AT tiruyetenaw patientreportedfunctionaloutcomemeasuresandtreatmentchoiceforprostatecancer
AT ocallaghanmichael patientreportedfunctionaloutcomemeasuresandtreatmentchoiceforprostatecancer
AT morettikim patientreportedfunctionaloutcomemeasuresandtreatmentchoiceforprostatecancer
AT jayalex patientreportedfunctionaloutcomemeasuresandtreatmentchoiceforprostatecancer
AT higgsbraden patientreportedfunctionaloutcomemeasuresandtreatmentchoiceforprostatecancer
AT santorokerry patientreportedfunctionaloutcomemeasuresandtreatmentchoiceforprostatecancer
AT boyleterry patientreportedfunctionaloutcomemeasuresandtreatmentchoiceforprostatecancer
AT ettridgekerry patientreportedfunctionaloutcomemeasuresandtreatmentchoiceforprostatecancer
AT beckmannkerri patientreportedfunctionaloutcomemeasuresandtreatmentchoiceforprostatecancer