Cargando…

Time trend in the surgical management of obstructed defecation syndrome: a multicenter experience on behalf of the Italian Society of Colorectal Surgery (SICCR)

BACKGROUND: Surgical management of obstructed defecation syndrome (ODS) is challenging, with several surgical options showing inconsistent functional results over time. The aim of this study was to evaluate the trend in surgical management of ODS in a 10-year timeframe across Italian referral center...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Picciariello, A., Rinaldi, M., Grossi, U., Trompetto, M., Graziano, G., Altomare, D. F., Gallo, G.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9637616/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36104607
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10151-022-02705-x
_version_ 1784825226350034944
author Picciariello, A.
Rinaldi, M.
Grossi, U.
Trompetto, M.
Graziano, G.
Altomare, D. F.
Gallo, G.
author_facet Picciariello, A.
Rinaldi, M.
Grossi, U.
Trompetto, M.
Graziano, G.
Altomare, D. F.
Gallo, G.
author_sort Picciariello, A.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Surgical management of obstructed defecation syndrome (ODS) is challenging, with several surgical options showing inconsistent functional results over time. The aim of this study was to evaluate the trend in surgical management of ODS in a 10-year timeframe across Italian referral centers. METHODS: Surgeons from referral centers for the management of pelvic floor disorders and affiliated to the Italian Society of Colorectal Surgery provided data on the yearly volume of procedures for ODS from 2010 to 2019. Six common clinical scenarios of ODS were captured, including details on patient’s anal sphincter function and presence of rectocele and/or rectal intussusception. Perineal repair, ventral rectopexy (VRP), transanal repair (internal Delorme), stapled transanal rectal resection (STARR), Contour Transtar, and transvaginal repair were considered in each clinical scenario. RESULTS: Twenty-five centers were included providing data on 2943 surgical patients. Procedure volumes ranged from 10–20 (54%) to 21–50 (46%) per year across centers. The most performed techniques in patients with good sphincter function were transanal repair for isolated rectocele (243/716 [34%]), transanal repair for isolated rectal intussusception (287/677 [42%]) and VRP for combined abnormalities (464/976 [48%]). When considering poor sphincter function, these were perineal repair (112/194 [57.8%]) for isolated rectocele, and VRP for the other two scenarios (60/120 [50%] and 97/260 [37%], respectively). The use of STARR and Contour Transtar decreased over time in patients with impaired sphincter function. CONCLUSIONS: The complexity of ODS treatment is confirmed by the variety of clinical scenarios that can occur and by the changing trend of surgical management over the last 10 years.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9637616
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-96376162022-11-08 Time trend in the surgical management of obstructed defecation syndrome: a multicenter experience on behalf of the Italian Society of Colorectal Surgery (SICCR) Picciariello, A. Rinaldi, M. Grossi, U. Trompetto, M. Graziano, G. Altomare, D. F. Gallo, G. Tech Coloproctol Original Article BACKGROUND: Surgical management of obstructed defecation syndrome (ODS) is challenging, with several surgical options showing inconsistent functional results over time. The aim of this study was to evaluate the trend in surgical management of ODS in a 10-year timeframe across Italian referral centers. METHODS: Surgeons from referral centers for the management of pelvic floor disorders and affiliated to the Italian Society of Colorectal Surgery provided data on the yearly volume of procedures for ODS from 2010 to 2019. Six common clinical scenarios of ODS were captured, including details on patient’s anal sphincter function and presence of rectocele and/or rectal intussusception. Perineal repair, ventral rectopexy (VRP), transanal repair (internal Delorme), stapled transanal rectal resection (STARR), Contour Transtar, and transvaginal repair were considered in each clinical scenario. RESULTS: Twenty-five centers were included providing data on 2943 surgical patients. Procedure volumes ranged from 10–20 (54%) to 21–50 (46%) per year across centers. The most performed techniques in patients with good sphincter function were transanal repair for isolated rectocele (243/716 [34%]), transanal repair for isolated rectal intussusception (287/677 [42%]) and VRP for combined abnormalities (464/976 [48%]). When considering poor sphincter function, these were perineal repair (112/194 [57.8%]) for isolated rectocele, and VRP for the other two scenarios (60/120 [50%] and 97/260 [37%], respectively). The use of STARR and Contour Transtar decreased over time in patients with impaired sphincter function. CONCLUSIONS: The complexity of ODS treatment is confirmed by the variety of clinical scenarios that can occur and by the changing trend of surgical management over the last 10 years. Springer International Publishing 2022-09-14 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC9637616/ /pubmed/36104607 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10151-022-02705-x Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Article
Picciariello, A.
Rinaldi, M.
Grossi, U.
Trompetto, M.
Graziano, G.
Altomare, D. F.
Gallo, G.
Time trend in the surgical management of obstructed defecation syndrome: a multicenter experience on behalf of the Italian Society of Colorectal Surgery (SICCR)
title Time trend in the surgical management of obstructed defecation syndrome: a multicenter experience on behalf of the Italian Society of Colorectal Surgery (SICCR)
title_full Time trend in the surgical management of obstructed defecation syndrome: a multicenter experience on behalf of the Italian Society of Colorectal Surgery (SICCR)
title_fullStr Time trend in the surgical management of obstructed defecation syndrome: a multicenter experience on behalf of the Italian Society of Colorectal Surgery (SICCR)
title_full_unstemmed Time trend in the surgical management of obstructed defecation syndrome: a multicenter experience on behalf of the Italian Society of Colorectal Surgery (SICCR)
title_short Time trend in the surgical management of obstructed defecation syndrome: a multicenter experience on behalf of the Italian Society of Colorectal Surgery (SICCR)
title_sort time trend in the surgical management of obstructed defecation syndrome: a multicenter experience on behalf of the italian society of colorectal surgery (siccr)
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9637616/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36104607
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10151-022-02705-x
work_keys_str_mv AT picciarielloa timetrendinthesurgicalmanagementofobstructeddefecationsyndromeamulticenterexperienceonbehalfoftheitaliansocietyofcolorectalsurgerysiccr
AT rinaldim timetrendinthesurgicalmanagementofobstructeddefecationsyndromeamulticenterexperienceonbehalfoftheitaliansocietyofcolorectalsurgerysiccr
AT grossiu timetrendinthesurgicalmanagementofobstructeddefecationsyndromeamulticenterexperienceonbehalfoftheitaliansocietyofcolorectalsurgerysiccr
AT trompettom timetrendinthesurgicalmanagementofobstructeddefecationsyndromeamulticenterexperienceonbehalfoftheitaliansocietyofcolorectalsurgerysiccr
AT grazianog timetrendinthesurgicalmanagementofobstructeddefecationsyndromeamulticenterexperienceonbehalfoftheitaliansocietyofcolorectalsurgerysiccr
AT altomaredf timetrendinthesurgicalmanagementofobstructeddefecationsyndromeamulticenterexperienceonbehalfoftheitaliansocietyofcolorectalsurgerysiccr
AT timetrendinthesurgicalmanagementofobstructeddefecationsyndromeamulticenterexperienceonbehalfoftheitaliansocietyofcolorectalsurgerysiccr
AT gallog timetrendinthesurgicalmanagementofobstructeddefecationsyndromeamulticenterexperienceonbehalfoftheitaliansocietyofcolorectalsurgerysiccr