Cargando…
Clinical effectiveness of restorative materials for the restoration of carious lesions in pulp treated primary teeth: a systematic review
PURPOSE: To systematically review the clinical performance of restorative materials after pulp therapy of carious primary teeth. It is part 2 of a systematic review on the clinical effectiveness of restorative materials for the management of carious primary teeth supporting the European Academy of P...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9637617/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36056991 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40368-022-00744-4 |
_version_ | 1784825226591207424 |
---|---|
author | Amend, S. Boutsiouki, C. Bekes, K. Kloukos, D. Gizani, S. Lygidakis, N. N. Frankenberger, R. Krämer, N. |
author_facet | Amend, S. Boutsiouki, C. Bekes, K. Kloukos, D. Gizani, S. Lygidakis, N. N. Frankenberger, R. Krämer, N. |
author_sort | Amend, S. |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: To systematically review the clinical performance of restorative materials after pulp therapy of carious primary teeth. It is part 2 of a systematic review on the clinical effectiveness of restorative materials for the management of carious primary teeth supporting the European Academy of Paediatric Dentistry (EAPD) guideline development. METHODS: Four electronic databases were systematically searched up to December 28th, 2020. Randomised controlled clinical trials (RCTs) on restorative materials for the restoration of carious primary teeth after pulp therapy were included. Failure rate, annual failure rate (AFR) and reasons for failure were recorded. Studies were sorted by restorative materials. The Cochrane Risk of bias tool for randomised trials (RoB 2.0) was used for quality assessment. RESULTS: After identification of 1685 articles and screening of 41 papers from EAPD review group 1, 5 RCTs were included. Restored primary molars with pulpotomy presented the following AFRs: composite resin (CR) 0%, preformed metal crowns (PMCs) 2.4–2.5%, resin-modified glass-ionomer cement combined with CR 3.8%, compomer 8.9%, and amalgam 14.3%. Maxillary primary incisors receiving pulpectomy exhibited AFRs of 0–2.3% for composite strip crowns (CSCs) depending on the post chosen. Reasons for failure were secondary caries, poor marginal adaptation, loss of retention and fracture of restoration. All studies were classified as high risk of bias. Meta-analyses were not feasible given the clinical/methodological heterogeneity amongst studies. CONCLUSION: Considering any limitations of this review, CR and PMCs can be recommended for primary molars after pulpotomy, and CSCs for primary incisors receiving pulpectomy. However, a need for further well-designed RCTs was observed. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40368-022-00744-4. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9637617 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-96376172022-11-08 Clinical effectiveness of restorative materials for the restoration of carious lesions in pulp treated primary teeth: a systematic review Amend, S. Boutsiouki, C. Bekes, K. Kloukos, D. Gizani, S. Lygidakis, N. N. Frankenberger, R. Krämer, N. Eur Arch Paediatr Dent Systematic Review PURPOSE: To systematically review the clinical performance of restorative materials after pulp therapy of carious primary teeth. It is part 2 of a systematic review on the clinical effectiveness of restorative materials for the management of carious primary teeth supporting the European Academy of Paediatric Dentistry (EAPD) guideline development. METHODS: Four electronic databases were systematically searched up to December 28th, 2020. Randomised controlled clinical trials (RCTs) on restorative materials for the restoration of carious primary teeth after pulp therapy were included. Failure rate, annual failure rate (AFR) and reasons for failure were recorded. Studies were sorted by restorative materials. The Cochrane Risk of bias tool for randomised trials (RoB 2.0) was used for quality assessment. RESULTS: After identification of 1685 articles and screening of 41 papers from EAPD review group 1, 5 RCTs were included. Restored primary molars with pulpotomy presented the following AFRs: composite resin (CR) 0%, preformed metal crowns (PMCs) 2.4–2.5%, resin-modified glass-ionomer cement combined with CR 3.8%, compomer 8.9%, and amalgam 14.3%. Maxillary primary incisors receiving pulpectomy exhibited AFRs of 0–2.3% for composite strip crowns (CSCs) depending on the post chosen. Reasons for failure were secondary caries, poor marginal adaptation, loss of retention and fracture of restoration. All studies were classified as high risk of bias. Meta-analyses were not feasible given the clinical/methodological heterogeneity amongst studies. CONCLUSION: Considering any limitations of this review, CR and PMCs can be recommended for primary molars after pulpotomy, and CSCs for primary incisors receiving pulpectomy. However, a need for further well-designed RCTs was observed. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40368-022-00744-4. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2022-09-03 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC9637617/ /pubmed/36056991 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40368-022-00744-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Systematic Review Amend, S. Boutsiouki, C. Bekes, K. Kloukos, D. Gizani, S. Lygidakis, N. N. Frankenberger, R. Krämer, N. Clinical effectiveness of restorative materials for the restoration of carious lesions in pulp treated primary teeth: a systematic review |
title | Clinical effectiveness of restorative materials for the restoration of carious lesions in pulp treated primary teeth: a systematic review |
title_full | Clinical effectiveness of restorative materials for the restoration of carious lesions in pulp treated primary teeth: a systematic review |
title_fullStr | Clinical effectiveness of restorative materials for the restoration of carious lesions in pulp treated primary teeth: a systematic review |
title_full_unstemmed | Clinical effectiveness of restorative materials for the restoration of carious lesions in pulp treated primary teeth: a systematic review |
title_short | Clinical effectiveness of restorative materials for the restoration of carious lesions in pulp treated primary teeth: a systematic review |
title_sort | clinical effectiveness of restorative materials for the restoration of carious lesions in pulp treated primary teeth: a systematic review |
topic | Systematic Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9637617/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36056991 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40368-022-00744-4 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT amends clinicaleffectivenessofrestorativematerialsfortherestorationofcariouslesionsinpulptreatedprimaryteethasystematicreview AT boutsioukic clinicaleffectivenessofrestorativematerialsfortherestorationofcariouslesionsinpulptreatedprimaryteethasystematicreview AT bekesk clinicaleffectivenessofrestorativematerialsfortherestorationofcariouslesionsinpulptreatedprimaryteethasystematicreview AT kloukosd clinicaleffectivenessofrestorativematerialsfortherestorationofcariouslesionsinpulptreatedprimaryteethasystematicreview AT gizanis clinicaleffectivenessofrestorativematerialsfortherestorationofcariouslesionsinpulptreatedprimaryteethasystematicreview AT lygidakisnn clinicaleffectivenessofrestorativematerialsfortherestorationofcariouslesionsinpulptreatedprimaryteethasystematicreview AT frankenbergerr clinicaleffectivenessofrestorativematerialsfortherestorationofcariouslesionsinpulptreatedprimaryteethasystematicreview AT kramern clinicaleffectivenessofrestorativematerialsfortherestorationofcariouslesionsinpulptreatedprimaryteethasystematicreview |