Cargando…

Clinical effectiveness of restorative materials for the restoration of carious lesions in pulp treated primary teeth: a systematic review

PURPOSE: To systematically review the clinical performance of restorative materials after pulp therapy of carious primary teeth. It is part 2 of a systematic review on the clinical effectiveness of restorative materials for the management of carious primary teeth supporting the European Academy of P...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Amend, S., Boutsiouki, C., Bekes, K., Kloukos, D., Gizani, S., Lygidakis, N. N., Frankenberger, R., Krämer, N.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9637617/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36056991
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40368-022-00744-4
_version_ 1784825226591207424
author Amend, S.
Boutsiouki, C.
Bekes, K.
Kloukos, D.
Gizani, S.
Lygidakis, N. N.
Frankenberger, R.
Krämer, N.
author_facet Amend, S.
Boutsiouki, C.
Bekes, K.
Kloukos, D.
Gizani, S.
Lygidakis, N. N.
Frankenberger, R.
Krämer, N.
author_sort Amend, S.
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To systematically review the clinical performance of restorative materials after pulp therapy of carious primary teeth. It is part 2 of a systematic review on the clinical effectiveness of restorative materials for the management of carious primary teeth supporting the European Academy of Paediatric Dentistry (EAPD) guideline development. METHODS: Four electronic databases were systematically searched up to December 28th, 2020. Randomised controlled clinical trials (RCTs) on restorative materials for the restoration of carious primary teeth after pulp therapy were included. Failure rate, annual failure rate (AFR) and reasons for failure were recorded. Studies were sorted by restorative materials. The Cochrane Risk of bias tool for randomised trials (RoB 2.0) was used for quality assessment. RESULTS: After identification of 1685 articles and screening of 41 papers from EAPD review group 1, 5 RCTs were included. Restored primary molars with pulpotomy presented the following AFRs: composite resin (CR) 0%, preformed metal crowns (PMCs) 2.4–2.5%, resin-modified glass-ionomer cement combined with CR 3.8%, compomer 8.9%, and amalgam 14.3%. Maxillary primary incisors receiving pulpectomy exhibited AFRs of 0–2.3% for composite strip crowns (CSCs) depending on the post chosen. Reasons for failure were secondary caries, poor marginal adaptation, loss of retention and fracture of restoration. All studies were classified as high risk of bias. Meta-analyses were not feasible given the clinical/methodological heterogeneity amongst studies. CONCLUSION: Considering any limitations of this review, CR and PMCs can be recommended for primary molars after pulpotomy, and CSCs for primary incisors receiving pulpectomy. However, a need for further well-designed RCTs was observed. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40368-022-00744-4.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9637617
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-96376172022-11-08 Clinical effectiveness of restorative materials for the restoration of carious lesions in pulp treated primary teeth: a systematic review Amend, S. Boutsiouki, C. Bekes, K. Kloukos, D. Gizani, S. Lygidakis, N. N. Frankenberger, R. Krämer, N. Eur Arch Paediatr Dent Systematic Review PURPOSE: To systematically review the clinical performance of restorative materials after pulp therapy of carious primary teeth. It is part 2 of a systematic review on the clinical effectiveness of restorative materials for the management of carious primary teeth supporting the European Academy of Paediatric Dentistry (EAPD) guideline development. METHODS: Four electronic databases were systematically searched up to December 28th, 2020. Randomised controlled clinical trials (RCTs) on restorative materials for the restoration of carious primary teeth after pulp therapy were included. Failure rate, annual failure rate (AFR) and reasons for failure were recorded. Studies were sorted by restorative materials. The Cochrane Risk of bias tool for randomised trials (RoB 2.0) was used for quality assessment. RESULTS: After identification of 1685 articles and screening of 41 papers from EAPD review group 1, 5 RCTs were included. Restored primary molars with pulpotomy presented the following AFRs: composite resin (CR) 0%, preformed metal crowns (PMCs) 2.4–2.5%, resin-modified glass-ionomer cement combined with CR 3.8%, compomer 8.9%, and amalgam 14.3%. Maxillary primary incisors receiving pulpectomy exhibited AFRs of 0–2.3% for composite strip crowns (CSCs) depending on the post chosen. Reasons for failure were secondary caries, poor marginal adaptation, loss of retention and fracture of restoration. All studies were classified as high risk of bias. Meta-analyses were not feasible given the clinical/methodological heterogeneity amongst studies. CONCLUSION: Considering any limitations of this review, CR and PMCs can be recommended for primary molars after pulpotomy, and CSCs for primary incisors receiving pulpectomy. However, a need for further well-designed RCTs was observed. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40368-022-00744-4. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2022-09-03 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC9637617/ /pubmed/36056991 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40368-022-00744-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Systematic Review
Amend, S.
Boutsiouki, C.
Bekes, K.
Kloukos, D.
Gizani, S.
Lygidakis, N. N.
Frankenberger, R.
Krämer, N.
Clinical effectiveness of restorative materials for the restoration of carious lesions in pulp treated primary teeth: a systematic review
title Clinical effectiveness of restorative materials for the restoration of carious lesions in pulp treated primary teeth: a systematic review
title_full Clinical effectiveness of restorative materials for the restoration of carious lesions in pulp treated primary teeth: a systematic review
title_fullStr Clinical effectiveness of restorative materials for the restoration of carious lesions in pulp treated primary teeth: a systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Clinical effectiveness of restorative materials for the restoration of carious lesions in pulp treated primary teeth: a systematic review
title_short Clinical effectiveness of restorative materials for the restoration of carious lesions in pulp treated primary teeth: a systematic review
title_sort clinical effectiveness of restorative materials for the restoration of carious lesions in pulp treated primary teeth: a systematic review
topic Systematic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9637617/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36056991
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40368-022-00744-4
work_keys_str_mv AT amends clinicaleffectivenessofrestorativematerialsfortherestorationofcariouslesionsinpulptreatedprimaryteethasystematicreview
AT boutsioukic clinicaleffectivenessofrestorativematerialsfortherestorationofcariouslesionsinpulptreatedprimaryteethasystematicreview
AT bekesk clinicaleffectivenessofrestorativematerialsfortherestorationofcariouslesionsinpulptreatedprimaryteethasystematicreview
AT kloukosd clinicaleffectivenessofrestorativematerialsfortherestorationofcariouslesionsinpulptreatedprimaryteethasystematicreview
AT gizanis clinicaleffectivenessofrestorativematerialsfortherestorationofcariouslesionsinpulptreatedprimaryteethasystematicreview
AT lygidakisnn clinicaleffectivenessofrestorativematerialsfortherestorationofcariouslesionsinpulptreatedprimaryteethasystematicreview
AT frankenbergerr clinicaleffectivenessofrestorativematerialsfortherestorationofcariouslesionsinpulptreatedprimaryteethasystematicreview
AT kramern clinicaleffectivenessofrestorativematerialsfortherestorationofcariouslesionsinpulptreatedprimaryteethasystematicreview