Cargando…
Which is the most effective rescue treatment after the failure of mechanical thrombectomy for acute basilar artery occlusion?
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of rescue therapy, a therapy in which rescue devices such as balloon angioplasty, Apollo stent, Wingspan stent, Solitaire stent, or other self-expanding stents are used after the failure of mechanical thrombectomy (MT) and...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9637633/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36353136 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2022.992396 |
_version_ | 1784825230341963776 |
---|---|
author | Luo, Jun Wu, Deping Li, Zhimin Xie, Dongjing Huang, Jiacheng Song, Jiaxing Luo, Weidong Liu, Shuai Li, Fengli Zi, Wenjie Huang, Qiaojuan Luo, Jiefeng Kong, Deyan |
author_facet | Luo, Jun Wu, Deping Li, Zhimin Xie, Dongjing Huang, Jiacheng Song, Jiaxing Luo, Weidong Liu, Shuai Li, Fengli Zi, Wenjie Huang, Qiaojuan Luo, Jiefeng Kong, Deyan |
author_sort | Luo, Jun |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of rescue therapy, a therapy in which rescue devices such as balloon angioplasty, Apollo stent, Wingspan stent, Solitaire stent, or other self-expanding stents are used after the failure of mechanical thrombectomy (MT) and to determine the most effective rescue measure for acute basilar artery occlusion (BAO) after the failure of MT. METHODS: For this study, we recruited patients from the BASILAR registry. All participants were divided into three groups: the recanalized with rescue therapy group, the recanalized without rescue therapy group, and the non-recanalized group. Clinical outcomes at 90 days and 1 year were compared. The association of rescue measures with favorable outcomes (modified Rankin Scale [mRS] score of 0–3) in patients achieving successful recanalization via rescue therapy was estimated using multivariate logistic regression analyses. RESULTS: Among the participants, recanalization failure was found in 112 patients and successful recanalization in 473 patients, with 218 patients receiving rescue therapy and 255 patients without rescue therapy. Of these, 111 (43.5%) patients in the recanalized without rescue therapy group, 65 (29.8%) patients in the recanalized with rescue therapy group, and nine (8.0%) patients in the non-recanalized group achieved favorable outcomes at 90 days. Both the recanalization with rescue therapy and the recanalization without rescue therapy groups were associated with favorable outcomes at 90 days and 1 year compared with the non-recanalized group. Moreover, in patients receiving rescue therapy, Wingspan stents, Apollo stents, and balloon angioplasty were associated with higher rates of favorable outcomes at 90 days and 1 year than Solitaire stents. CONCLUSION: Whether rescue therapy is administered or not, recanalization leads to favorable outcomes in patients with acute BAO. For acute BAO after MT failure, balloon angioplasty, Wingspan stenting, and Apollo stenting could be considered effective and safe rescue options but not Solitaire stenting. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9637633 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-96376332022-11-08 Which is the most effective rescue treatment after the failure of mechanical thrombectomy for acute basilar artery occlusion? Luo, Jun Wu, Deping Li, Zhimin Xie, Dongjing Huang, Jiacheng Song, Jiaxing Luo, Weidong Liu, Shuai Li, Fengli Zi, Wenjie Huang, Qiaojuan Luo, Jiefeng Kong, Deyan Front Neurol Neurology OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of rescue therapy, a therapy in which rescue devices such as balloon angioplasty, Apollo stent, Wingspan stent, Solitaire stent, or other self-expanding stents are used after the failure of mechanical thrombectomy (MT) and to determine the most effective rescue measure for acute basilar artery occlusion (BAO) after the failure of MT. METHODS: For this study, we recruited patients from the BASILAR registry. All participants were divided into three groups: the recanalized with rescue therapy group, the recanalized without rescue therapy group, and the non-recanalized group. Clinical outcomes at 90 days and 1 year were compared. The association of rescue measures with favorable outcomes (modified Rankin Scale [mRS] score of 0–3) in patients achieving successful recanalization via rescue therapy was estimated using multivariate logistic regression analyses. RESULTS: Among the participants, recanalization failure was found in 112 patients and successful recanalization in 473 patients, with 218 patients receiving rescue therapy and 255 patients without rescue therapy. Of these, 111 (43.5%) patients in the recanalized without rescue therapy group, 65 (29.8%) patients in the recanalized with rescue therapy group, and nine (8.0%) patients in the non-recanalized group achieved favorable outcomes at 90 days. Both the recanalization with rescue therapy and the recanalization without rescue therapy groups were associated with favorable outcomes at 90 days and 1 year compared with the non-recanalized group. Moreover, in patients receiving rescue therapy, Wingspan stents, Apollo stents, and balloon angioplasty were associated with higher rates of favorable outcomes at 90 days and 1 year than Solitaire stents. CONCLUSION: Whether rescue therapy is administered or not, recanalization leads to favorable outcomes in patients with acute BAO. For acute BAO after MT failure, balloon angioplasty, Wingspan stenting, and Apollo stenting could be considered effective and safe rescue options but not Solitaire stenting. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-10-24 /pmc/articles/PMC9637633/ /pubmed/36353136 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2022.992396 Text en Copyright © 2022 Luo, Wu, Li, Xie, Huang, Song, Luo, Liu, Li, Zi, Huang, Luo and Kong. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Neurology Luo, Jun Wu, Deping Li, Zhimin Xie, Dongjing Huang, Jiacheng Song, Jiaxing Luo, Weidong Liu, Shuai Li, Fengli Zi, Wenjie Huang, Qiaojuan Luo, Jiefeng Kong, Deyan Which is the most effective rescue treatment after the failure of mechanical thrombectomy for acute basilar artery occlusion? |
title | Which is the most effective rescue treatment after the failure of mechanical thrombectomy for acute basilar artery occlusion? |
title_full | Which is the most effective rescue treatment after the failure of mechanical thrombectomy for acute basilar artery occlusion? |
title_fullStr | Which is the most effective rescue treatment after the failure of mechanical thrombectomy for acute basilar artery occlusion? |
title_full_unstemmed | Which is the most effective rescue treatment after the failure of mechanical thrombectomy for acute basilar artery occlusion? |
title_short | Which is the most effective rescue treatment after the failure of mechanical thrombectomy for acute basilar artery occlusion? |
title_sort | which is the most effective rescue treatment after the failure of mechanical thrombectomy for acute basilar artery occlusion? |
topic | Neurology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9637633/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36353136 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2022.992396 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT luojun whichisthemosteffectiverescuetreatmentafterthefailureofmechanicalthrombectomyforacutebasilararteryocclusion AT wudeping whichisthemosteffectiverescuetreatmentafterthefailureofmechanicalthrombectomyforacutebasilararteryocclusion AT lizhimin whichisthemosteffectiverescuetreatmentafterthefailureofmechanicalthrombectomyforacutebasilararteryocclusion AT xiedongjing whichisthemosteffectiverescuetreatmentafterthefailureofmechanicalthrombectomyforacutebasilararteryocclusion AT huangjiacheng whichisthemosteffectiverescuetreatmentafterthefailureofmechanicalthrombectomyforacutebasilararteryocclusion AT songjiaxing whichisthemosteffectiverescuetreatmentafterthefailureofmechanicalthrombectomyforacutebasilararteryocclusion AT luoweidong whichisthemosteffectiverescuetreatmentafterthefailureofmechanicalthrombectomyforacutebasilararteryocclusion AT liushuai whichisthemosteffectiverescuetreatmentafterthefailureofmechanicalthrombectomyforacutebasilararteryocclusion AT lifengli whichisthemosteffectiverescuetreatmentafterthefailureofmechanicalthrombectomyforacutebasilararteryocclusion AT ziwenjie whichisthemosteffectiverescuetreatmentafterthefailureofmechanicalthrombectomyforacutebasilararteryocclusion AT huangqiaojuan whichisthemosteffectiverescuetreatmentafterthefailureofmechanicalthrombectomyforacutebasilararteryocclusion AT luojiefeng whichisthemosteffectiverescuetreatmentafterthefailureofmechanicalthrombectomyforacutebasilararteryocclusion AT kongdeyan whichisthemosteffectiverescuetreatmentafterthefailureofmechanicalthrombectomyforacutebasilararteryocclusion |