Cargando…

Analysis of land suitability for apple-based agroforestry farming in Dire and Legedadi watersheds of Ethiopia: implication for ecosystem services

This study was conducted to evaluate land suitability for apple farming in the Dire and Legedadi watersheds of the central highlands of Ethiopia. Attributes that determine apple growth were categorized into environmental, soil, climate, and land management factors. The land evaluation methodology de...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Admasu, Simeneh, Desta, Hayal, Yeshitela, Kumelachew, Argaw, Mekuria
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9637651/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36353178
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e11217
_version_ 1784825233778147328
author Admasu, Simeneh
Desta, Hayal
Yeshitela, Kumelachew
Argaw, Mekuria
author_facet Admasu, Simeneh
Desta, Hayal
Yeshitela, Kumelachew
Argaw, Mekuria
author_sort Admasu, Simeneh
collection PubMed
description This study was conducted to evaluate land suitability for apple farming in the Dire and Legedadi watersheds of the central highlands of Ethiopia. Attributes that determine apple growth were categorized into environmental, soil, climate, and land management factors. The land evaluation methodology developed by FAO (1976) was applied in six steps. First, nine thematic layers are prepared. Second, pair-wise comparison matrices were performed using AHP. Third, thematic layers are reclassified. Forth, weights are assigned to each class. Fifth, weighted overlay analysis was performed to produce a land suitability map. Finally, the land suitability map was classified into high, moderate, marginally suitable, and unsuitable categories. Soil type received the highest weight of 1.98 followed by elevation and LULC of 1.51 each. The mean temperature, rainfall, soil pH, and soil drainage weight were 1.41, 0.94, 0.56, and 0.52 respectively. Whereas the slope and aspect weighted the lowest at 0.38 and 0.19 respectively. Out of the total area of the watersheds, about 14 km(2) (6.7%) and 12.34 km(2) (13.1%) are highly suitable for apple farming in the Legedadi and Dire watersheds respectively. Whereas, about 113.35 km(2) (53.8%) and 42.54 km(2) (45.2%) of land are not suitable in the Legedadi and Dire watersheds respectively. Landholders who play a pivotal role should be incentivized to grow perennial crops (e.g., apple-trees) to enhance environmental income and alleviate poverty.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9637651
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-96376512022-11-08 Analysis of land suitability for apple-based agroforestry farming in Dire and Legedadi watersheds of Ethiopia: implication for ecosystem services Admasu, Simeneh Desta, Hayal Yeshitela, Kumelachew Argaw, Mekuria Heliyon Research Article This study was conducted to evaluate land suitability for apple farming in the Dire and Legedadi watersheds of the central highlands of Ethiopia. Attributes that determine apple growth were categorized into environmental, soil, climate, and land management factors. The land evaluation methodology developed by FAO (1976) was applied in six steps. First, nine thematic layers are prepared. Second, pair-wise comparison matrices were performed using AHP. Third, thematic layers are reclassified. Forth, weights are assigned to each class. Fifth, weighted overlay analysis was performed to produce a land suitability map. Finally, the land suitability map was classified into high, moderate, marginally suitable, and unsuitable categories. Soil type received the highest weight of 1.98 followed by elevation and LULC of 1.51 each. The mean temperature, rainfall, soil pH, and soil drainage weight were 1.41, 0.94, 0.56, and 0.52 respectively. Whereas the slope and aspect weighted the lowest at 0.38 and 0.19 respectively. Out of the total area of the watersheds, about 14 km(2) (6.7%) and 12.34 km(2) (13.1%) are highly suitable for apple farming in the Legedadi and Dire watersheds respectively. Whereas, about 113.35 km(2) (53.8%) and 42.54 km(2) (45.2%) of land are not suitable in the Legedadi and Dire watersheds respectively. Landholders who play a pivotal role should be incentivized to grow perennial crops (e.g., apple-trees) to enhance environmental income and alleviate poverty. Elsevier 2022-10-22 /pmc/articles/PMC9637651/ /pubmed/36353178 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e11217 Text en © 2022 The Author(s) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Research Article
Admasu, Simeneh
Desta, Hayal
Yeshitela, Kumelachew
Argaw, Mekuria
Analysis of land suitability for apple-based agroforestry farming in Dire and Legedadi watersheds of Ethiopia: implication for ecosystem services
title Analysis of land suitability for apple-based agroforestry farming in Dire and Legedadi watersheds of Ethiopia: implication for ecosystem services
title_full Analysis of land suitability for apple-based agroforestry farming in Dire and Legedadi watersheds of Ethiopia: implication for ecosystem services
title_fullStr Analysis of land suitability for apple-based agroforestry farming in Dire and Legedadi watersheds of Ethiopia: implication for ecosystem services
title_full_unstemmed Analysis of land suitability for apple-based agroforestry farming in Dire and Legedadi watersheds of Ethiopia: implication for ecosystem services
title_short Analysis of land suitability for apple-based agroforestry farming in Dire and Legedadi watersheds of Ethiopia: implication for ecosystem services
title_sort analysis of land suitability for apple-based agroforestry farming in dire and legedadi watersheds of ethiopia: implication for ecosystem services
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9637651/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36353178
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e11217
work_keys_str_mv AT admasusimeneh analysisoflandsuitabilityforapplebasedagroforestryfarmingindireandlegedadiwatershedsofethiopiaimplicationforecosystemservices
AT destahayal analysisoflandsuitabilityforapplebasedagroforestryfarmingindireandlegedadiwatershedsofethiopiaimplicationforecosystemservices
AT yeshitelakumelachew analysisoflandsuitabilityforapplebasedagroforestryfarmingindireandlegedadiwatershedsofethiopiaimplicationforecosystemservices
AT argawmekuria analysisoflandsuitabilityforapplebasedagroforestryfarmingindireandlegedadiwatershedsofethiopiaimplicationforecosystemservices