Cargando…

Predictability of lower incisor tip using clear aligner therapy

BACKGROUND: Uprighting incisors is particularly important with clear aligner therapy as incisor tip determines the mesio-distal space needed in the arch, and consequently the fit of the aligner. The objective of this study was to investigate the accuracy of ClinCheck(®) software to predict lower inc...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Smith, Julia Meri, Weir, Tony, Kaang, Austin, Farella, Mauro
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9637687/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36336726
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40510-022-00433-4
_version_ 1784825242599817216
author Smith, Julia Meri
Weir, Tony
Kaang, Austin
Farella, Mauro
author_facet Smith, Julia Meri
Weir, Tony
Kaang, Austin
Farella, Mauro
author_sort Smith, Julia Meri
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Uprighting incisors is particularly important with clear aligner therapy as incisor tip determines the mesio-distal space needed in the arch, and consequently the fit of the aligner. The objective of this study was to investigate the accuracy of ClinCheck(®) software to predict lower incisor tip by comparing digitally prescribed movements with actual clinical outcomes and to determine whether the presence of a vertically orientated rectangular composite attachment influences the efficacy of incisor tip. METHODOLOGY: This retrospective study included 66 lower incisors from 42 non-extraction adult patients treated using the Invisalign(®) appliance. Twenty-one incisors had vertical attachments, while 45 incisors did not have any attachments. Lower incisor tip was measured at T0 (pre-treatment), T1 (predicted post-treatment) and T2 (achieved post-treatment) on digital models using metrology software. The change in position from T0 to T1 and T0 to T2 was measured from the estimated centre of resistance (C(Res)) of each tooth. The estimated centre of rotation was plotted relative to the C(Res) to describe the type of orthodontic tooth movement (OTM) predicted and achieved. RESULTS: Predicted incisor tip and achieved incisor tip were positively correlated (R(2) = 0.55; p < 0.001). For every degree of tip planned 0.4 degrees of tip was achieved. The presence of an attachment resulted in 1.2 degrees greater tip (F = 3.7; p = 0.062) and 0.5 mm greater movement of the predicted apex of the tooth (F = 4.3; p = 0.042) compared with the no attachment group. The type of OTM achieved differed from the type predicted. Sixty-seven percent of incisors investigated were predicted to move by root movement, while 46% achieved this type of movement. CONCLUSIONS: The amount of lower incisor tip achieved was on average substantially less than the ClinCheck(®) displayed. Vertically orientated rectangular attachments are recommended where large root movement is planned, and their presence slightly improves apex movement.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9637687
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-96376872022-11-14 Predictability of lower incisor tip using clear aligner therapy Smith, Julia Meri Weir, Tony Kaang, Austin Farella, Mauro Prog Orthod Research BACKGROUND: Uprighting incisors is particularly important with clear aligner therapy as incisor tip determines the mesio-distal space needed in the arch, and consequently the fit of the aligner. The objective of this study was to investigate the accuracy of ClinCheck(®) software to predict lower incisor tip by comparing digitally prescribed movements with actual clinical outcomes and to determine whether the presence of a vertically orientated rectangular composite attachment influences the efficacy of incisor tip. METHODOLOGY: This retrospective study included 66 lower incisors from 42 non-extraction adult patients treated using the Invisalign(®) appliance. Twenty-one incisors had vertical attachments, while 45 incisors did not have any attachments. Lower incisor tip was measured at T0 (pre-treatment), T1 (predicted post-treatment) and T2 (achieved post-treatment) on digital models using metrology software. The change in position from T0 to T1 and T0 to T2 was measured from the estimated centre of resistance (C(Res)) of each tooth. The estimated centre of rotation was plotted relative to the C(Res) to describe the type of orthodontic tooth movement (OTM) predicted and achieved. RESULTS: Predicted incisor tip and achieved incisor tip were positively correlated (R(2) = 0.55; p < 0.001). For every degree of tip planned 0.4 degrees of tip was achieved. The presence of an attachment resulted in 1.2 degrees greater tip (F = 3.7; p = 0.062) and 0.5 mm greater movement of the predicted apex of the tooth (F = 4.3; p = 0.042) compared with the no attachment group. The type of OTM achieved differed from the type predicted. Sixty-seven percent of incisors investigated were predicted to move by root movement, while 46% achieved this type of movement. CONCLUSIONS: The amount of lower incisor tip achieved was on average substantially less than the ClinCheck(®) displayed. Vertically orientated rectangular attachments are recommended where large root movement is planned, and their presence slightly improves apex movement. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2022-11-07 /pmc/articles/PMC9637687/ /pubmed/36336726 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40510-022-00433-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Research
Smith, Julia Meri
Weir, Tony
Kaang, Austin
Farella, Mauro
Predictability of lower incisor tip using clear aligner therapy
title Predictability of lower incisor tip using clear aligner therapy
title_full Predictability of lower incisor tip using clear aligner therapy
title_fullStr Predictability of lower incisor tip using clear aligner therapy
title_full_unstemmed Predictability of lower incisor tip using clear aligner therapy
title_short Predictability of lower incisor tip using clear aligner therapy
title_sort predictability of lower incisor tip using clear aligner therapy
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9637687/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36336726
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40510-022-00433-4
work_keys_str_mv AT smithjuliameri predictabilityoflowerincisortipusingclearalignertherapy
AT weirtony predictabilityoflowerincisortipusingclearalignertherapy
AT kaangaustin predictabilityoflowerincisortipusingclearalignertherapy
AT farellamauro predictabilityoflowerincisortipusingclearalignertherapy