Cargando…

Impact of age on shoulder range of motion and strength

BACKGROUND: Total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) is a surgical technique commonly used to treat patients with arthritis and rotator cuff deficiency. Its purpose is to reduce pain and improve shoulder function, namely range of motion (ROM) and strength. While shoulder ROM and strength have been studied...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pike, J. Mattison, Singh, Suvleen K., Barfield, William R., Schoch, Bradley, Friedman, Richard J., Eichinger, Josef K.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9637716/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36353423
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jseint.2022.08.016
_version_ 1784825248298827776
author Pike, J. Mattison
Singh, Suvleen K.
Barfield, William R.
Schoch, Bradley
Friedman, Richard J.
Eichinger, Josef K.
author_facet Pike, J. Mattison
Singh, Suvleen K.
Barfield, William R.
Schoch, Bradley
Friedman, Richard J.
Eichinger, Josef K.
author_sort Pike, J. Mattison
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) is a surgical technique commonly used to treat patients with arthritis and rotator cuff deficiency. Its purpose is to reduce pain and improve shoulder function, namely range of motion (ROM) and strength. While shoulder ROM and strength have been studied extensively in patients with various shoulder pathologies, there is a dearth of knowledge with regard to the asymptomatic population. METHODS: A cross-sectional study was conducted in the outpatient orthopaedic clinic following institutional review board approval. Patients 18 years of age and older with at least one asymptomatic and healthy shoulder with no prior history of shoulder surgery, injury, or pain were enrolled in the study. Demographic information, ROM, and strength measurements were collected for 256 shoulders, evenly stratified into groups by age and sex. A goniometer was used to measure forward elevation, abduction, and external rotation, and a handheld dynamometer was utilized for measuring strength. Statistical evaluation was conducted using Pearson correlations, analysis of variance, and Bonferroni and Mann–Whitney post hoc tests, with P < .01 indicating a significant difference. RESULTS: Abduction strength (P < .001), external rotation strength (P < .001), and internal rotation strength (P < .001) were negatively correlated with age when viewing the data as a whole and after stratification of males and females. Age and shoulder ROM, namely abduction (P < .001) and forward elevation (P < .001), were also significantly negatively correlated, although internal rotation decreased with age as well. When comparing across age groups, abduction (P = .001) and forward elevation (P = .001) were significantly higher in group 1 (18-35) when compared to group 4 (66+), but external rotation was not significantly different between these groups. External rotation (P = .001) was only significantly different between groups 2 (36-50) and 4. Variation in external rotation strength was also found. Group 4 was found to have significantly less strength than all 3 of the other groups. CONCLUSION: Shoulder strength significantly decreased with age, with abduction strength and external rotation strength displaying the strongest negative correlations. Decreases in strength were most prominent in patients 66 years of age and above. Shoulder ROM was not as tightly correlated with age, although abduction, forward elevation, and internal rotation were found to generally decrease over time. Differences in external rotation were not clinically significant. These correlations provide useful controls for patients of various ages regarding their clinical outcomes when presenting with shoulder pathology. Variations in current literature allow this study to verify the impact of age on shoulder ROM and strength.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9637716
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-96377162022-11-08 Impact of age on shoulder range of motion and strength Pike, J. Mattison Singh, Suvleen K. Barfield, William R. Schoch, Bradley Friedman, Richard J. Eichinger, Josef K. JSES Int Shoulder BACKGROUND: Total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) is a surgical technique commonly used to treat patients with arthritis and rotator cuff deficiency. Its purpose is to reduce pain and improve shoulder function, namely range of motion (ROM) and strength. While shoulder ROM and strength have been studied extensively in patients with various shoulder pathologies, there is a dearth of knowledge with regard to the asymptomatic population. METHODS: A cross-sectional study was conducted in the outpatient orthopaedic clinic following institutional review board approval. Patients 18 years of age and older with at least one asymptomatic and healthy shoulder with no prior history of shoulder surgery, injury, or pain were enrolled in the study. Demographic information, ROM, and strength measurements were collected for 256 shoulders, evenly stratified into groups by age and sex. A goniometer was used to measure forward elevation, abduction, and external rotation, and a handheld dynamometer was utilized for measuring strength. Statistical evaluation was conducted using Pearson correlations, analysis of variance, and Bonferroni and Mann–Whitney post hoc tests, with P < .01 indicating a significant difference. RESULTS: Abduction strength (P < .001), external rotation strength (P < .001), and internal rotation strength (P < .001) were negatively correlated with age when viewing the data as a whole and after stratification of males and females. Age and shoulder ROM, namely abduction (P < .001) and forward elevation (P < .001), were also significantly negatively correlated, although internal rotation decreased with age as well. When comparing across age groups, abduction (P = .001) and forward elevation (P = .001) were significantly higher in group 1 (18-35) when compared to group 4 (66+), but external rotation was not significantly different between these groups. External rotation (P = .001) was only significantly different between groups 2 (36-50) and 4. Variation in external rotation strength was also found. Group 4 was found to have significantly less strength than all 3 of the other groups. CONCLUSION: Shoulder strength significantly decreased with age, with abduction strength and external rotation strength displaying the strongest negative correlations. Decreases in strength were most prominent in patients 66 years of age and above. Shoulder ROM was not as tightly correlated with age, although abduction, forward elevation, and internal rotation were found to generally decrease over time. Differences in external rotation were not clinically significant. These correlations provide useful controls for patients of various ages regarding their clinical outcomes when presenting with shoulder pathology. Variations in current literature allow this study to verify the impact of age on shoulder ROM and strength. Elsevier 2022-09-14 /pmc/articles/PMC9637716/ /pubmed/36353423 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jseint.2022.08.016 Text en © 2022 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Shoulder
Pike, J. Mattison
Singh, Suvleen K.
Barfield, William R.
Schoch, Bradley
Friedman, Richard J.
Eichinger, Josef K.
Impact of age on shoulder range of motion and strength
title Impact of age on shoulder range of motion and strength
title_full Impact of age on shoulder range of motion and strength
title_fullStr Impact of age on shoulder range of motion and strength
title_full_unstemmed Impact of age on shoulder range of motion and strength
title_short Impact of age on shoulder range of motion and strength
title_sort impact of age on shoulder range of motion and strength
topic Shoulder
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9637716/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36353423
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jseint.2022.08.016
work_keys_str_mv AT pikejmattison impactofageonshoulderrangeofmotionandstrength
AT singhsuvleenk impactofageonshoulderrangeofmotionandstrength
AT barfieldwilliamr impactofageonshoulderrangeofmotionandstrength
AT schochbradley impactofageonshoulderrangeofmotionandstrength
AT friedmanrichardj impactofageonshoulderrangeofmotionandstrength
AT eichingerjosefk impactofageonshoulderrangeofmotionandstrength