Cargando…

Rotator cuff repair in upper extremity ambulators: an assessment of longitudinal outcomes

BACKGROUND: Individuals who rely on wheelchairs, walkers, and crutches for ambulation have an increased incidence of rotator cuff tears due to altered shoulder biomechanics and increased force transmission across the shoulder joint. The purpose of our study is to review our longitudinal outcomes tre...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Valiquette, Andrew M., Graf, Alexander R., Mickschl, Dara J., Zganjar, Andrew J., Grindel, Steven I.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9637750/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36353413
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jseint.2022.08.015
_version_ 1784825253775540224
author Valiquette, Andrew M.
Graf, Alexander R.
Mickschl, Dara J.
Zganjar, Andrew J.
Grindel, Steven I.
author_facet Valiquette, Andrew M.
Graf, Alexander R.
Mickschl, Dara J.
Zganjar, Andrew J.
Grindel, Steven I.
author_sort Valiquette, Andrew M.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Individuals who rely on wheelchairs, walkers, and crutches for ambulation have an increased incidence of rotator cuff tears due to altered shoulder biomechanics and increased force transmission across the shoulder joint. The purpose of our study is to review our longitudinal outcomes treating upper extremity ambulators to guide patient expectations and identify risk factors for rotator cuff repair failure. METHODS: A total of fifteen patients were included after a cohort of thirty-nine patients were identified. The mean age was 54.9 years at the time of index rotator cuff repair, with each patient requiring either wheelchair, cane, walker, or crutches for ambulation. Clinical outcomes were measured (strength, range of motion, and pain scores), and patient-reported outcome scores (American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons, Simple Shoulder Test, and University of California Los Angeles functional shoulder assessment tool) were obtained. No follow-up imaging was obtained unless indicated by a change in clinical status. RESULTS: Within our cohort, 14 of 15 (93%) presented with supraspinatus tears, 7 of 15 (47%) with infraspinatus tears, and only 3 of 15 (20%) with subscapularis pathology. Additionally, the rates of concurrent biceps pathology or acromioclavicular joint pathology were significant at 53% and 73%, respectively. Only one patient in our cohort experienced known failure of cuff repair, despite longitudinal follow-up at an average of 97 months following surgery, however, routine follow-up imaging was not obtained. There were statistically significant improvements in visual analog scale pain scores, forward flexion ROM and strength, and abduction ROM. Additionally, statistically significant improvements were noted in all patient-reported outcome scores measured. CONCLUSION: Despite the apparent risks associated in rotator cuff repair in upper extremity ambulators, these patients demonstrate clinically significant improvements following surgery. Appreciating additional pathology beyond the rotator cuff is important in formulating a treatment plan.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9637750
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-96377502022-11-08 Rotator cuff repair in upper extremity ambulators: an assessment of longitudinal outcomes Valiquette, Andrew M. Graf, Alexander R. Mickschl, Dara J. Zganjar, Andrew J. Grindel, Steven I. JSES Int Shoulder BACKGROUND: Individuals who rely on wheelchairs, walkers, and crutches for ambulation have an increased incidence of rotator cuff tears due to altered shoulder biomechanics and increased force transmission across the shoulder joint. The purpose of our study is to review our longitudinal outcomes treating upper extremity ambulators to guide patient expectations and identify risk factors for rotator cuff repair failure. METHODS: A total of fifteen patients were included after a cohort of thirty-nine patients were identified. The mean age was 54.9 years at the time of index rotator cuff repair, with each patient requiring either wheelchair, cane, walker, or crutches for ambulation. Clinical outcomes were measured (strength, range of motion, and pain scores), and patient-reported outcome scores (American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons, Simple Shoulder Test, and University of California Los Angeles functional shoulder assessment tool) were obtained. No follow-up imaging was obtained unless indicated by a change in clinical status. RESULTS: Within our cohort, 14 of 15 (93%) presented with supraspinatus tears, 7 of 15 (47%) with infraspinatus tears, and only 3 of 15 (20%) with subscapularis pathology. Additionally, the rates of concurrent biceps pathology or acromioclavicular joint pathology were significant at 53% and 73%, respectively. Only one patient in our cohort experienced known failure of cuff repair, despite longitudinal follow-up at an average of 97 months following surgery, however, routine follow-up imaging was not obtained. There were statistically significant improvements in visual analog scale pain scores, forward flexion ROM and strength, and abduction ROM. Additionally, statistically significant improvements were noted in all patient-reported outcome scores measured. CONCLUSION: Despite the apparent risks associated in rotator cuff repair in upper extremity ambulators, these patients demonstrate clinically significant improvements following surgery. Appreciating additional pathology beyond the rotator cuff is important in formulating a treatment plan. Elsevier 2022-09-15 /pmc/articles/PMC9637750/ /pubmed/36353413 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jseint.2022.08.015 Text en © 2022 Published by Elsevier Inc. on behalf of American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Shoulder
Valiquette, Andrew M.
Graf, Alexander R.
Mickschl, Dara J.
Zganjar, Andrew J.
Grindel, Steven I.
Rotator cuff repair in upper extremity ambulators: an assessment of longitudinal outcomes
title Rotator cuff repair in upper extremity ambulators: an assessment of longitudinal outcomes
title_full Rotator cuff repair in upper extremity ambulators: an assessment of longitudinal outcomes
title_fullStr Rotator cuff repair in upper extremity ambulators: an assessment of longitudinal outcomes
title_full_unstemmed Rotator cuff repair in upper extremity ambulators: an assessment of longitudinal outcomes
title_short Rotator cuff repair in upper extremity ambulators: an assessment of longitudinal outcomes
title_sort rotator cuff repair in upper extremity ambulators: an assessment of longitudinal outcomes
topic Shoulder
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9637750/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36353413
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jseint.2022.08.015
work_keys_str_mv AT valiquetteandrewm rotatorcuffrepairinupperextremityambulatorsanassessmentoflongitudinaloutcomes
AT grafalexanderr rotatorcuffrepairinupperextremityambulatorsanassessmentoflongitudinaloutcomes
AT mickschldaraj rotatorcuffrepairinupperextremityambulatorsanassessmentoflongitudinaloutcomes
AT zganjarandrewj rotatorcuffrepairinupperextremityambulatorsanassessmentoflongitudinaloutcomes
AT grindelsteveni rotatorcuffrepairinupperextremityambulatorsanassessmentoflongitudinaloutcomes