Cargando…

Risk factors for eccentric glenoid wear after humeral head replacement for cuff tear arthropathy

BACKGROUND: In our previous report, glenoid wear (GW) after humeral head replacement for cuff tear arthropathy was classified with modified Goya’s classification (grade 0-3), and, among 3 subtypes of grade 3 (glenoid bone erosion), grade 3B (superior eccentric erosion) showed significantly more pain...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kawamata, Jun, Suenaga, Naoki, Oizumi, Naomi, Hisada, Yukiyoshi, Miyoshi, Naoki
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9637801/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36353441
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jseint.2022.08.008
_version_ 1784825261845381120
author Kawamata, Jun
Suenaga, Naoki
Oizumi, Naomi
Hisada, Yukiyoshi
Miyoshi, Naoki
author_facet Kawamata, Jun
Suenaga, Naoki
Oizumi, Naomi
Hisada, Yukiyoshi
Miyoshi, Naoki
author_sort Kawamata, Jun
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: In our previous report, glenoid wear (GW) after humeral head replacement for cuff tear arthropathy was classified with modified Goya’s classification (grade 0-3), and, among 3 subtypes of grade 3 (glenoid bone erosion), grade 3B (superior eccentric erosion) showed significantly more pain and limited active flexion postoperatively compared to grade 3C (concentric erosion). The purpose of this study was to detect individual risk factors for the progression to grade 3B GW. METHODS: Seventy-nine shoulders in 70 patients who were followed up for a mean of 8.2 years (range, 5.0-13.2 years), including 29 men and 41 women, with a mean age at the surgery of 71.1 years (range, 54-87 years), were reviewed. Atrophy and fatty degeneration of torn cuff muscle, preoperative humeral head displacement (superior translation ratio [STR], anterior translation ratio, and other several parameters) on preoperative magnetic resonance imaging, and other individual factors were analyzed as possible risk factors. RESULTS: GW at the final follow-up was grade 0: 5 shoulders, grade 1: 17, grade 2: 20, and grade 3: 37 (3A: 4, 3B: 22, and 3C: 11). Preoperative higher STR was defined as a risk factor for grade 3 GW (odds ratio, 35.5; 95% confidence interval, 1.8-693.0; P = .018). Comparison among the three subtypes of grade 3 showed that patients with grade 3B GW had larger STR than 3C (41.4 ± 14.2% vs. 23.5 ± 13.3 % P = .006). CONCLUSION: Patients with preoperative high STR are considered to have a risk for grade 3B GW, which possibly relates to poor clinical outcome and future revision.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9637801
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-96378012022-11-08 Risk factors for eccentric glenoid wear after humeral head replacement for cuff tear arthropathy Kawamata, Jun Suenaga, Naoki Oizumi, Naomi Hisada, Yukiyoshi Miyoshi, Naoki JSES Int Shoulder BACKGROUND: In our previous report, glenoid wear (GW) after humeral head replacement for cuff tear arthropathy was classified with modified Goya’s classification (grade 0-3), and, among 3 subtypes of grade 3 (glenoid bone erosion), grade 3B (superior eccentric erosion) showed significantly more pain and limited active flexion postoperatively compared to grade 3C (concentric erosion). The purpose of this study was to detect individual risk factors for the progression to grade 3B GW. METHODS: Seventy-nine shoulders in 70 patients who were followed up for a mean of 8.2 years (range, 5.0-13.2 years), including 29 men and 41 women, with a mean age at the surgery of 71.1 years (range, 54-87 years), were reviewed. Atrophy and fatty degeneration of torn cuff muscle, preoperative humeral head displacement (superior translation ratio [STR], anterior translation ratio, and other several parameters) on preoperative magnetic resonance imaging, and other individual factors were analyzed as possible risk factors. RESULTS: GW at the final follow-up was grade 0: 5 shoulders, grade 1: 17, grade 2: 20, and grade 3: 37 (3A: 4, 3B: 22, and 3C: 11). Preoperative higher STR was defined as a risk factor for grade 3 GW (odds ratio, 35.5; 95% confidence interval, 1.8-693.0; P = .018). Comparison among the three subtypes of grade 3 showed that patients with grade 3B GW had larger STR than 3C (41.4 ± 14.2% vs. 23.5 ± 13.3 % P = .006). CONCLUSION: Patients with preoperative high STR are considered to have a risk for grade 3B GW, which possibly relates to poor clinical outcome and future revision. Elsevier 2022-09-13 /pmc/articles/PMC9637801/ /pubmed/36353441 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jseint.2022.08.008 Text en © 2022 The Author(s) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Shoulder
Kawamata, Jun
Suenaga, Naoki
Oizumi, Naomi
Hisada, Yukiyoshi
Miyoshi, Naoki
Risk factors for eccentric glenoid wear after humeral head replacement for cuff tear arthropathy
title Risk factors for eccentric glenoid wear after humeral head replacement for cuff tear arthropathy
title_full Risk factors for eccentric glenoid wear after humeral head replacement for cuff tear arthropathy
title_fullStr Risk factors for eccentric glenoid wear after humeral head replacement for cuff tear arthropathy
title_full_unstemmed Risk factors for eccentric glenoid wear after humeral head replacement for cuff tear arthropathy
title_short Risk factors for eccentric glenoid wear after humeral head replacement for cuff tear arthropathy
title_sort risk factors for eccentric glenoid wear after humeral head replacement for cuff tear arthropathy
topic Shoulder
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9637801/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36353441
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jseint.2022.08.008
work_keys_str_mv AT kawamatajun riskfactorsforeccentricglenoidwearafterhumeralheadreplacementforcuffteararthropathy
AT suenaganaoki riskfactorsforeccentricglenoidwearafterhumeralheadreplacementforcuffteararthropathy
AT oizuminaomi riskfactorsforeccentricglenoidwearafterhumeralheadreplacementforcuffteararthropathy
AT hisadayukiyoshi riskfactorsforeccentricglenoidwearafterhumeralheadreplacementforcuffteararthropathy
AT miyoshinaoki riskfactorsforeccentricglenoidwearafterhumeralheadreplacementforcuffteararthropathy