Cargando…
Healthcare decision-making capacity in old age: A qualitative study
OBJECTIVES: Research about decision-making capacity has been growing in the last decades. That relates to more concerns regarding patients’ autonomy, and an increase in diseases that can negatively impact capacity. This research aims to: explore perceptions, legal aspects, and assessment procedures...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9638398/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36353088 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1024967 |
_version_ | 1784825406378999808 |
---|---|
author | Amaral, Ana Saraiva Simões, Mário Rodrigues Freitas, Sandra Vilar, Manuela Sousa, Liliana Baptista Afonso, Rosa Marina |
author_facet | Amaral, Ana Saraiva Simões, Mário Rodrigues Freitas, Sandra Vilar, Manuela Sousa, Liliana Baptista Afonso, Rosa Marina |
author_sort | Amaral, Ana Saraiva |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: Research about decision-making capacity has been growing in the last decades. That relates to more concerns regarding patients’ autonomy, and an increase in diseases that can negatively impact capacity. This research aims to: explore perceptions, legal aspects, and assessment procedures related to healthcare decision-making capacity in older adults with cognitive impairment; and study the first version of a new assessment instrument of this capacity. METHOD: Nine focus groups were conducted, including healthcare, law and justice, nursing home professionals, institutionalized older adults, and dwelling older adults. Focus group discussions followed semi-structured interview scripts, specifically developed for each group. After group discussions, the assessment instrument was presented, and participants were asked to evaluate each item relevance and comprehensibility. Qualitative coding of the transcriptions was performed with resource to MAXQDA, using direct content analysis. RESULTS: Six primary themes emerged from the qualitative analysis: Decision-making capacity features; Abilities implied in decision-making; Factors influencing decision-making; Obstacles to decision-making; Legal aspects; and Assessment procedures. DISCUSSION: Results corroborate previous theoretical formulations of capacity. Generally, research results have implications for clinical and assessment practices, as well as preventive strategies that can improve older adult’s decision-making capacity. Assessment procedures of capacity should include a thorough protocol for the assessment of cognition, functionality, depressive symptoms, and decision-making abilities. In this respect, the need for an assessment tool that can provide valid information during evaluation processes is highlighted. Concerning the strategies to promote decision-making capacity, these rely on improving older adult’s health literacy and healthcare providers communication skills, as well as conduct actions to reduce stigma toward people with dementia. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9638398 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-96383982022-11-08 Healthcare decision-making capacity in old age: A qualitative study Amaral, Ana Saraiva Simões, Mário Rodrigues Freitas, Sandra Vilar, Manuela Sousa, Liliana Baptista Afonso, Rosa Marina Front Psychol Psychology OBJECTIVES: Research about decision-making capacity has been growing in the last decades. That relates to more concerns regarding patients’ autonomy, and an increase in diseases that can negatively impact capacity. This research aims to: explore perceptions, legal aspects, and assessment procedures related to healthcare decision-making capacity in older adults with cognitive impairment; and study the first version of a new assessment instrument of this capacity. METHOD: Nine focus groups were conducted, including healthcare, law and justice, nursing home professionals, institutionalized older adults, and dwelling older adults. Focus group discussions followed semi-structured interview scripts, specifically developed for each group. After group discussions, the assessment instrument was presented, and participants were asked to evaluate each item relevance and comprehensibility. Qualitative coding of the transcriptions was performed with resource to MAXQDA, using direct content analysis. RESULTS: Six primary themes emerged from the qualitative analysis: Decision-making capacity features; Abilities implied in decision-making; Factors influencing decision-making; Obstacles to decision-making; Legal aspects; and Assessment procedures. DISCUSSION: Results corroborate previous theoretical formulations of capacity. Generally, research results have implications for clinical and assessment practices, as well as preventive strategies that can improve older adult’s decision-making capacity. Assessment procedures of capacity should include a thorough protocol for the assessment of cognition, functionality, depressive symptoms, and decision-making abilities. In this respect, the need for an assessment tool that can provide valid information during evaluation processes is highlighted. Concerning the strategies to promote decision-making capacity, these rely on improving older adult’s health literacy and healthcare providers communication skills, as well as conduct actions to reduce stigma toward people with dementia. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-10-24 /pmc/articles/PMC9638398/ /pubmed/36353088 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1024967 Text en Copyright © 2022 Amaral, Simões, Freitas, Vilar, Sousa and Afonso. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Psychology Amaral, Ana Saraiva Simões, Mário Rodrigues Freitas, Sandra Vilar, Manuela Sousa, Liliana Baptista Afonso, Rosa Marina Healthcare decision-making capacity in old age: A qualitative study |
title | Healthcare decision-making capacity in old age: A qualitative study |
title_full | Healthcare decision-making capacity in old age: A qualitative study |
title_fullStr | Healthcare decision-making capacity in old age: A qualitative study |
title_full_unstemmed | Healthcare decision-making capacity in old age: A qualitative study |
title_short | Healthcare decision-making capacity in old age: A qualitative study |
title_sort | healthcare decision-making capacity in old age: a qualitative study |
topic | Psychology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9638398/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36353088 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1024967 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT amaralanasaraiva healthcaredecisionmakingcapacityinoldageaqualitativestudy AT simoesmariorodrigues healthcaredecisionmakingcapacityinoldageaqualitativestudy AT freitassandra healthcaredecisionmakingcapacityinoldageaqualitativestudy AT vilarmanuela healthcaredecisionmakingcapacityinoldageaqualitativestudy AT sousalilianabaptista healthcaredecisionmakingcapacityinoldageaqualitativestudy AT afonsorosamarina healthcaredecisionmakingcapacityinoldageaqualitativestudy |