Cargando…

Healthcare decision-making capacity in old age: A qualitative study

OBJECTIVES: Research about decision-making capacity has been growing in the last decades. That relates to more concerns regarding patients’ autonomy, and an increase in diseases that can negatively impact capacity. This research aims to: explore perceptions, legal aspects, and assessment procedures...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Amaral, Ana Saraiva, Simões, Mário Rodrigues, Freitas, Sandra, Vilar, Manuela, Sousa, Liliana Baptista, Afonso, Rosa Marina
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9638398/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36353088
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1024967
_version_ 1784825406378999808
author Amaral, Ana Saraiva
Simões, Mário Rodrigues
Freitas, Sandra
Vilar, Manuela
Sousa, Liliana Baptista
Afonso, Rosa Marina
author_facet Amaral, Ana Saraiva
Simões, Mário Rodrigues
Freitas, Sandra
Vilar, Manuela
Sousa, Liliana Baptista
Afonso, Rosa Marina
author_sort Amaral, Ana Saraiva
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: Research about decision-making capacity has been growing in the last decades. That relates to more concerns regarding patients’ autonomy, and an increase in diseases that can negatively impact capacity. This research aims to: explore perceptions, legal aspects, and assessment procedures related to healthcare decision-making capacity in older adults with cognitive impairment; and study the first version of a new assessment instrument of this capacity. METHOD: Nine focus groups were conducted, including healthcare, law and justice, nursing home professionals, institutionalized older adults, and dwelling older adults. Focus group discussions followed semi-structured interview scripts, specifically developed for each group. After group discussions, the assessment instrument was presented, and participants were asked to evaluate each item relevance and comprehensibility. Qualitative coding of the transcriptions was performed with resource to MAXQDA, using direct content analysis. RESULTS: Six primary themes emerged from the qualitative analysis: Decision-making capacity features; Abilities implied in decision-making; Factors influencing decision-making; Obstacles to decision-making; Legal aspects; and Assessment procedures. DISCUSSION: Results corroborate previous theoretical formulations of capacity. Generally, research results have implications for clinical and assessment practices, as well as preventive strategies that can improve older adult’s decision-making capacity. Assessment procedures of capacity should include a thorough protocol for the assessment of cognition, functionality, depressive symptoms, and decision-making abilities. In this respect, the need for an assessment tool that can provide valid information during evaluation processes is highlighted. Concerning the strategies to promote decision-making capacity, these rely on improving older adult’s health literacy and healthcare providers communication skills, as well as conduct actions to reduce stigma toward people with dementia.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9638398
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-96383982022-11-08 Healthcare decision-making capacity in old age: A qualitative study Amaral, Ana Saraiva Simões, Mário Rodrigues Freitas, Sandra Vilar, Manuela Sousa, Liliana Baptista Afonso, Rosa Marina Front Psychol Psychology OBJECTIVES: Research about decision-making capacity has been growing in the last decades. That relates to more concerns regarding patients’ autonomy, and an increase in diseases that can negatively impact capacity. This research aims to: explore perceptions, legal aspects, and assessment procedures related to healthcare decision-making capacity in older adults with cognitive impairment; and study the first version of a new assessment instrument of this capacity. METHOD: Nine focus groups were conducted, including healthcare, law and justice, nursing home professionals, institutionalized older adults, and dwelling older adults. Focus group discussions followed semi-structured interview scripts, specifically developed for each group. After group discussions, the assessment instrument was presented, and participants were asked to evaluate each item relevance and comprehensibility. Qualitative coding of the transcriptions was performed with resource to MAXQDA, using direct content analysis. RESULTS: Six primary themes emerged from the qualitative analysis: Decision-making capacity features; Abilities implied in decision-making; Factors influencing decision-making; Obstacles to decision-making; Legal aspects; and Assessment procedures. DISCUSSION: Results corroborate previous theoretical formulations of capacity. Generally, research results have implications for clinical and assessment practices, as well as preventive strategies that can improve older adult’s decision-making capacity. Assessment procedures of capacity should include a thorough protocol for the assessment of cognition, functionality, depressive symptoms, and decision-making abilities. In this respect, the need for an assessment tool that can provide valid information during evaluation processes is highlighted. Concerning the strategies to promote decision-making capacity, these rely on improving older adult’s health literacy and healthcare providers communication skills, as well as conduct actions to reduce stigma toward people with dementia. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-10-24 /pmc/articles/PMC9638398/ /pubmed/36353088 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1024967 Text en Copyright © 2022 Amaral, Simões, Freitas, Vilar, Sousa and Afonso. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Psychology
Amaral, Ana Saraiva
Simões, Mário Rodrigues
Freitas, Sandra
Vilar, Manuela
Sousa, Liliana Baptista
Afonso, Rosa Marina
Healthcare decision-making capacity in old age: A qualitative study
title Healthcare decision-making capacity in old age: A qualitative study
title_full Healthcare decision-making capacity in old age: A qualitative study
title_fullStr Healthcare decision-making capacity in old age: A qualitative study
title_full_unstemmed Healthcare decision-making capacity in old age: A qualitative study
title_short Healthcare decision-making capacity in old age: A qualitative study
title_sort healthcare decision-making capacity in old age: a qualitative study
topic Psychology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9638398/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36353088
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1024967
work_keys_str_mv AT amaralanasaraiva healthcaredecisionmakingcapacityinoldageaqualitativestudy
AT simoesmariorodrigues healthcaredecisionmakingcapacityinoldageaqualitativestudy
AT freitassandra healthcaredecisionmakingcapacityinoldageaqualitativestudy
AT vilarmanuela healthcaredecisionmakingcapacityinoldageaqualitativestudy
AT sousalilianabaptista healthcaredecisionmakingcapacityinoldageaqualitativestudy
AT afonsorosamarina healthcaredecisionmakingcapacityinoldageaqualitativestudy