Cargando…
The comparison of self-management group education and the standard care for patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis
To investigate the efficacy of self-management group education versus the standard care for patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM). An electronic search was performed in nine databases including PubMed for selecting eligible studies. Meta-analysis was used for pooling of the results. Of 3446 re...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9638609/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36352914 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_2087_21 |
_version_ | 1784825457298898944 |
---|---|
author | Al Harbi, Shatha Saleh Alajmi, Mubarak Mohammed Algabbas, Sulaiman Mohammed Alharbi, Mohammad Saleh |
author_facet | Al Harbi, Shatha Saleh Alajmi, Mubarak Mohammed Algabbas, Sulaiman Mohammed Alharbi, Mohammad Saleh |
author_sort | Al Harbi, Shatha Saleh |
collection | PubMed |
description | To investigate the efficacy of self-management group education versus the standard care for patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM). An electronic search was performed in nine databases including PubMed for selecting eligible studies. Meta-analysis was used for pooling of the results. Of 3446 records screened, we included ten studies for this systematic review and meta-analysis. Regarding assessment of effectiveness, there was a significant superiority reported in the intervention group when compared to the usual/standard care (standardized mean difference [95% confidence interval] = 0.24 [0.15; 0.32]). The intervention group had a significant reduction in the levels of hemoglobin A1C (HbA1C), fasting blood glucose, low-density lipoprotein, total cholesterol, and body mass index compared to the usual/standard care (p < 0.05). Moreover, no significant difference was observed in the levels of high-density lipoprotein, systolic blood pressure (SBP), or diastolic blood pressure (DBP) between the two groups (p > 0.05). Self-management group education interventions are recommended in patients with type 2 DM for their effectiveness in different clinical aspects. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9638609 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Wolters Kluwer - Medknow |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-96386092022-11-08 The comparison of self-management group education and the standard care for patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis Al Harbi, Shatha Saleh Alajmi, Mubarak Mohammed Algabbas, Sulaiman Mohammed Alharbi, Mohammad Saleh J Family Med Prim Care Review Article To investigate the efficacy of self-management group education versus the standard care for patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM). An electronic search was performed in nine databases including PubMed for selecting eligible studies. Meta-analysis was used for pooling of the results. Of 3446 records screened, we included ten studies for this systematic review and meta-analysis. Regarding assessment of effectiveness, there was a significant superiority reported in the intervention group when compared to the usual/standard care (standardized mean difference [95% confidence interval] = 0.24 [0.15; 0.32]). The intervention group had a significant reduction in the levels of hemoglobin A1C (HbA1C), fasting blood glucose, low-density lipoprotein, total cholesterol, and body mass index compared to the usual/standard care (p < 0.05). Moreover, no significant difference was observed in the levels of high-density lipoprotein, systolic blood pressure (SBP), or diastolic blood pressure (DBP) between the two groups (p > 0.05). Self-management group education interventions are recommended in patients with type 2 DM for their effectiveness in different clinical aspects. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2022-08 2022-08-30 /pmc/articles/PMC9638609/ /pubmed/36352914 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_2087_21 Text en Copyright: © 2022 Journal of Family Medicine and Primary Care https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms. |
spellingShingle | Review Article Al Harbi, Shatha Saleh Alajmi, Mubarak Mohammed Algabbas, Sulaiman Mohammed Alharbi, Mohammad Saleh The comparison of self-management group education and the standard care for patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis |
title | The comparison of self-management group education and the standard care for patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full | The comparison of self-management group education and the standard care for patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_fullStr | The comparison of self-management group education and the standard care for patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | The comparison of self-management group education and the standard care for patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_short | The comparison of self-management group education and the standard care for patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_sort | comparison of self-management group education and the standard care for patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis |
topic | Review Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9638609/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36352914 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_2087_21 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT alharbishathasaleh thecomparisonofselfmanagementgroupeducationandthestandardcareforpatientswithtype2diabetesmellitusanupdatedsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT alajmimubarakmohammed thecomparisonofselfmanagementgroupeducationandthestandardcareforpatientswithtype2diabetesmellitusanupdatedsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT algabbassulaimanmohammed thecomparisonofselfmanagementgroupeducationandthestandardcareforpatientswithtype2diabetesmellitusanupdatedsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT alharbimohammadsaleh thecomparisonofselfmanagementgroupeducationandthestandardcareforpatientswithtype2diabetesmellitusanupdatedsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT alharbishathasaleh comparisonofselfmanagementgroupeducationandthestandardcareforpatientswithtype2diabetesmellitusanupdatedsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT alajmimubarakmohammed comparisonofselfmanagementgroupeducationandthestandardcareforpatientswithtype2diabetesmellitusanupdatedsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT algabbassulaimanmohammed comparisonofselfmanagementgroupeducationandthestandardcareforpatientswithtype2diabetesmellitusanupdatedsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT alharbimohammadsaleh comparisonofselfmanagementgroupeducationandthestandardcareforpatientswithtype2diabetesmellitusanupdatedsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis |