Cargando…

The comparison of self-management group education and the standard care for patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis

To investigate the efficacy of self-management group education versus the standard care for patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM). An electronic search was performed in nine databases including PubMed for selecting eligible studies. Meta-analysis was used for pooling of the results. Of 3446 re...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Al Harbi, Shatha Saleh, Alajmi, Mubarak Mohammed, Algabbas, Sulaiman Mohammed, Alharbi, Mohammad Saleh
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9638609/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36352914
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_2087_21
_version_ 1784825457298898944
author Al Harbi, Shatha Saleh
Alajmi, Mubarak Mohammed
Algabbas, Sulaiman Mohammed
Alharbi, Mohammad Saleh
author_facet Al Harbi, Shatha Saleh
Alajmi, Mubarak Mohammed
Algabbas, Sulaiman Mohammed
Alharbi, Mohammad Saleh
author_sort Al Harbi, Shatha Saleh
collection PubMed
description To investigate the efficacy of self-management group education versus the standard care for patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM). An electronic search was performed in nine databases including PubMed for selecting eligible studies. Meta-analysis was used for pooling of the results. Of 3446 records screened, we included ten studies for this systematic review and meta-analysis. Regarding assessment of effectiveness, there was a significant superiority reported in the intervention group when compared to the usual/standard care (standardized mean difference [95% confidence interval] = 0.24 [0.15; 0.32]). The intervention group had a significant reduction in the levels of hemoglobin A1C (HbA1C), fasting blood glucose, low-density lipoprotein, total cholesterol, and body mass index compared to the usual/standard care (p < 0.05). Moreover, no significant difference was observed in the levels of high-density lipoprotein, systolic blood pressure (SBP), or diastolic blood pressure (DBP) between the two groups (p > 0.05). Self-management group education interventions are recommended in patients with type 2 DM for their effectiveness in different clinical aspects.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9638609
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-96386092022-11-08 The comparison of self-management group education and the standard care for patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis Al Harbi, Shatha Saleh Alajmi, Mubarak Mohammed Algabbas, Sulaiman Mohammed Alharbi, Mohammad Saleh J Family Med Prim Care Review Article To investigate the efficacy of self-management group education versus the standard care for patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM). An electronic search was performed in nine databases including PubMed for selecting eligible studies. Meta-analysis was used for pooling of the results. Of 3446 records screened, we included ten studies for this systematic review and meta-analysis. Regarding assessment of effectiveness, there was a significant superiority reported in the intervention group when compared to the usual/standard care (standardized mean difference [95% confidence interval] = 0.24 [0.15; 0.32]). The intervention group had a significant reduction in the levels of hemoglobin A1C (HbA1C), fasting blood glucose, low-density lipoprotein, total cholesterol, and body mass index compared to the usual/standard care (p < 0.05). Moreover, no significant difference was observed in the levels of high-density lipoprotein, systolic blood pressure (SBP), or diastolic blood pressure (DBP) between the two groups (p > 0.05). Self-management group education interventions are recommended in patients with type 2 DM for their effectiveness in different clinical aspects. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2022-08 2022-08-30 /pmc/articles/PMC9638609/ /pubmed/36352914 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_2087_21 Text en Copyright: © 2022 Journal of Family Medicine and Primary Care https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Review Article
Al Harbi, Shatha Saleh
Alajmi, Mubarak Mohammed
Algabbas, Sulaiman Mohammed
Alharbi, Mohammad Saleh
The comparison of self-management group education and the standard care for patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis
title The comparison of self-management group education and the standard care for patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full The comparison of self-management group education and the standard care for patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr The comparison of self-management group education and the standard care for patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed The comparison of self-management group education and the standard care for patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short The comparison of self-management group education and the standard care for patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort comparison of self-management group education and the standard care for patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9638609/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36352914
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_2087_21
work_keys_str_mv AT alharbishathasaleh thecomparisonofselfmanagementgroupeducationandthestandardcareforpatientswithtype2diabetesmellitusanupdatedsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT alajmimubarakmohammed thecomparisonofselfmanagementgroupeducationandthestandardcareforpatientswithtype2diabetesmellitusanupdatedsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT algabbassulaimanmohammed thecomparisonofselfmanagementgroupeducationandthestandardcareforpatientswithtype2diabetesmellitusanupdatedsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT alharbimohammadsaleh thecomparisonofselfmanagementgroupeducationandthestandardcareforpatientswithtype2diabetesmellitusanupdatedsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT alharbishathasaleh comparisonofselfmanagementgroupeducationandthestandardcareforpatientswithtype2diabetesmellitusanupdatedsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT alajmimubarakmohammed comparisonofselfmanagementgroupeducationandthestandardcareforpatientswithtype2diabetesmellitusanupdatedsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT algabbassulaimanmohammed comparisonofselfmanagementgroupeducationandthestandardcareforpatientswithtype2diabetesmellitusanupdatedsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT alharbimohammadsaleh comparisonofselfmanagementgroupeducationandthestandardcareforpatientswithtype2diabetesmellitusanupdatedsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis