Cargando…

Crystal structure of bis­{3-(3,4-di­methyl­phen­yl)-5-[6-(1H-pyrazol-1-yl)pyridin-2-yl]-4H-1,2,4-triazol-4-ido}iron(II) methanol disolvate

As a result of the high symmetry of the Aea2 structure, the asymmetric unit of the title compound, [Fe(II)(C(18)H(15)N(6))(2)]·2MeOH, consists of half of a charge-neutral complex mol­ecule and a discrete methanol mol­ecule. The planar anionic tridentate ligand 2-[5-(3,4-di­methyl­phen­yl)-4H-1,2,4-t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Znovjyak, Kateryna, Fritsky, Igor O., Sliva, Tatiana Y., Amirkhanov, Vladimir M., Malinkin, Sergey O., Shova, Sergiu, Seredyuk, Maksym
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: International Union of Crystallography 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9638982/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36380912
http://dx.doi.org/10.1107/S2056989022009744
Descripción
Sumario:As a result of the high symmetry of the Aea2 structure, the asymmetric unit of the title compound, [Fe(II)(C(18)H(15)N(6))(2)]·2MeOH, consists of half of a charge-neutral complex mol­ecule and a discrete methanol mol­ecule. The planar anionic tridentate ligand 2-[5-(3,4-di­methyl­phen­yl)-4H-1,2,4-triazol-3-ato]-6-(1H-pyrazol-1-yl)pyridine coordinates the Fe(II) ion meridionally through the N atoms of the pyrazole, pyridine and triazole groups, forming a pseudo-octa­hedral coordination sphere of the central ion. The average Fe—N bond distance is 1.955 Å, indicating a low-spin state of the Fe(II) ion. Neighbouring cone-shaped mol­ecules, nested into each other, are linked through double weak C—H(pz)⋯π(ph’) inter­actions into mono-periodic columns, which are further linked through weak C—H⋯N′/C′ inter­actions into di-periodic layers. No inter­actions shorter than the sum of the van der Waals radii of the neighbouring layers are observed. Energy framework analysis at the B3LYP/6–31 G(d,p) theory level, performed to qu­antify the inter­molecular inter­action energies, reproduces the weak inter­layer inter­actions in contrast to the strong inter­action within the layers. Inter­molecular contacts were qu­anti­fied using Hirshfeld surface analysis and two-dimensional fingerprint plots, showing the relative contributions of the contacts to the crystal packing to be H⋯H 48.5%, H⋯C/C⋯H 28.9%, H⋯N/N⋯H 16.2% and C⋯C 2.4%.