Cargando…

Comparative efficacy and complications of long-acting and intermediate-acting insulin regimens for adults with type 1 diabetes: an individual patient data network meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE: To examine the comparative efficacy and complications of long-acting and intermediate-acting insulin for different patient characteristics for type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM). DESIGN: Systematic review and individual patient data (IPD) network meta-analysis (NMA). DATA SOURCES: MEDLINE, E...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Veroniki, Areti Angeliki, Seitidis, Georgios, Stewart, Lesley, Clarke, Mike, Tudur-Smith, Catrin, Mavridis, Dimitris, Yu, Catherine H, Moja, Lorenzo, Straus, Sharon E, Tricco, Andrea C
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9639076/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36332950
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-058034
_version_ 1784825558863970304
author Veroniki, Areti Angeliki
Seitidis, Georgios
Stewart, Lesley
Clarke, Mike
Tudur-Smith, Catrin
Mavridis, Dimitris
Yu, Catherine H
Moja, Lorenzo
Straus, Sharon E
Tricco, Andrea C
author_facet Veroniki, Areti Angeliki
Seitidis, Georgios
Stewart, Lesley
Clarke, Mike
Tudur-Smith, Catrin
Mavridis, Dimitris
Yu, Catherine H
Moja, Lorenzo
Straus, Sharon E
Tricco, Andrea C
author_sort Veroniki, Areti Angeliki
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To examine the comparative efficacy and complications of long-acting and intermediate-acting insulin for different patient characteristics for type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM). DESIGN: Systematic review and individual patient data (IPD) network meta-analysis (NMA). DATA SOURCES: MEDLINE, EMBASE and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched through June 2015. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) on adults with T1DM assessing glycosylated haemoglobin (A1c) and severe hypoglycaemia in long-acting and intermediate-acting insulin regimens. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: We requested IPD from authors and funders. When IPD were not available, we used aggregate data. We conducted a random-effects model, and specifically a one-stage IPD-NMA for those studies providing IPD and a two-stage IPD-NMA to incorporate those studies not providing IPD. RESULTS: We included 28 RCTs plus one companion report, after screening 6680 titles/abstracts and 205 full-text articles. Of the 28 RCTs, 27 studies provided data for the NMA with 7394 participants, of which 12 RCTs had IPD on 4943 participants. The IPD-NMA for A1c suggested that glargine once daily (mean difference [MD]=−0.31, 95% confidence interval [CI]: −0.48 to −0.14) and detemir once daily (MD=−0.25, 95% CI: –0.41 to −0.09) were superior to neutral protamine Hagedorn (NPH) once daily. NPH once/two times per day improved A1c compared with NPH once daily (MD=−0.30, 95% CI: –0.50 to −0.11). Results regarding complications in severe hypoglycaemia should be considered with great caution due to inconsistency in the evidence network. Accounting for missing data, there was no evidence of inconsistency and long-acting insulin regimens ranked higher regarding reducing severe hypoglycaemia compared with intermediate-acting insulin regimens (two-stage NMA: glargine two times per day SUCRA (Surface Under the Cumulative Ranking curve)=89%, detemir once daily SUCRA=77%; one-stage NMA: detemir once daily/two times per day SUCRA=85%). Using multiple imputations and IPD only, complications in severe hypoglycaemia increased with diabetes-related comorbidities (regression coefficient: 1.03, 95% CI: 1.02 to 1.03). CONCLUSIONS: Long-acting insulin regimens reduced A1c compared with intermediate-acting insulin regimens and were associated with lower severe hypoglycaemia. Of the observed differences, only glargine once daily achieved a clinically significant reduction of 0.30%. Results should be interpreted with caution due to very low quality of evidence. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42015023511.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9639076
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-96390762022-11-08 Comparative efficacy and complications of long-acting and intermediate-acting insulin regimens for adults with type 1 diabetes: an individual patient data network meta-analysis Veroniki, Areti Angeliki Seitidis, Georgios Stewart, Lesley Clarke, Mike Tudur-Smith, Catrin Mavridis, Dimitris Yu, Catherine H Moja, Lorenzo Straus, Sharon E Tricco, Andrea C BMJ Open Diabetes and Endocrinology OBJECTIVE: To examine the comparative efficacy and complications of long-acting and intermediate-acting insulin for different patient characteristics for type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM). DESIGN: Systematic review and individual patient data (IPD) network meta-analysis (NMA). DATA SOURCES: MEDLINE, EMBASE and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched through June 2015. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) on adults with T1DM assessing glycosylated haemoglobin (A1c) and severe hypoglycaemia in long-acting and intermediate-acting insulin regimens. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: We requested IPD from authors and funders. When IPD were not available, we used aggregate data. We conducted a random-effects model, and specifically a one-stage IPD-NMA for those studies providing IPD and a two-stage IPD-NMA to incorporate those studies not providing IPD. RESULTS: We included 28 RCTs plus one companion report, after screening 6680 titles/abstracts and 205 full-text articles. Of the 28 RCTs, 27 studies provided data for the NMA with 7394 participants, of which 12 RCTs had IPD on 4943 participants. The IPD-NMA for A1c suggested that glargine once daily (mean difference [MD]=−0.31, 95% confidence interval [CI]: −0.48 to −0.14) and detemir once daily (MD=−0.25, 95% CI: –0.41 to −0.09) were superior to neutral protamine Hagedorn (NPH) once daily. NPH once/two times per day improved A1c compared with NPH once daily (MD=−0.30, 95% CI: –0.50 to −0.11). Results regarding complications in severe hypoglycaemia should be considered with great caution due to inconsistency in the evidence network. Accounting for missing data, there was no evidence of inconsistency and long-acting insulin regimens ranked higher regarding reducing severe hypoglycaemia compared with intermediate-acting insulin regimens (two-stage NMA: glargine two times per day SUCRA (Surface Under the Cumulative Ranking curve)=89%, detemir once daily SUCRA=77%; one-stage NMA: detemir once daily/two times per day SUCRA=85%). Using multiple imputations and IPD only, complications in severe hypoglycaemia increased with diabetes-related comorbidities (regression coefficient: 1.03, 95% CI: 1.02 to 1.03). CONCLUSIONS: Long-acting insulin regimens reduced A1c compared with intermediate-acting insulin regimens and were associated with lower severe hypoglycaemia. Of the observed differences, only glargine once daily achieved a clinically significant reduction of 0.30%. Results should be interpreted with caution due to very low quality of evidence. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42015023511. BMJ Publishing Group 2022-11-04 /pmc/articles/PMC9639076/ /pubmed/36332950 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-058034 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Diabetes and Endocrinology
Veroniki, Areti Angeliki
Seitidis, Georgios
Stewart, Lesley
Clarke, Mike
Tudur-Smith, Catrin
Mavridis, Dimitris
Yu, Catherine H
Moja, Lorenzo
Straus, Sharon E
Tricco, Andrea C
Comparative efficacy and complications of long-acting and intermediate-acting insulin regimens for adults with type 1 diabetes: an individual patient data network meta-analysis
title Comparative efficacy and complications of long-acting and intermediate-acting insulin regimens for adults with type 1 diabetes: an individual patient data network meta-analysis
title_full Comparative efficacy and complications of long-acting and intermediate-acting insulin regimens for adults with type 1 diabetes: an individual patient data network meta-analysis
title_fullStr Comparative efficacy and complications of long-acting and intermediate-acting insulin regimens for adults with type 1 diabetes: an individual patient data network meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Comparative efficacy and complications of long-acting and intermediate-acting insulin regimens for adults with type 1 diabetes: an individual patient data network meta-analysis
title_short Comparative efficacy and complications of long-acting and intermediate-acting insulin regimens for adults with type 1 diabetes: an individual patient data network meta-analysis
title_sort comparative efficacy and complications of long-acting and intermediate-acting insulin regimens for adults with type 1 diabetes: an individual patient data network meta-analysis
topic Diabetes and Endocrinology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9639076/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36332950
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-058034
work_keys_str_mv AT veronikiaretiangeliki comparativeefficacyandcomplicationsoflongactingandintermediateactinginsulinregimensforadultswithtype1diabetesanindividualpatientdatanetworkmetaanalysis
AT seitidisgeorgios comparativeefficacyandcomplicationsoflongactingandintermediateactinginsulinregimensforadultswithtype1diabetesanindividualpatientdatanetworkmetaanalysis
AT stewartlesley comparativeefficacyandcomplicationsoflongactingandintermediateactinginsulinregimensforadultswithtype1diabetesanindividualpatientdatanetworkmetaanalysis
AT clarkemike comparativeefficacyandcomplicationsoflongactingandintermediateactinginsulinregimensforadultswithtype1diabetesanindividualpatientdatanetworkmetaanalysis
AT tudursmithcatrin comparativeefficacyandcomplicationsoflongactingandintermediateactinginsulinregimensforadultswithtype1diabetesanindividualpatientdatanetworkmetaanalysis
AT mavridisdimitris comparativeefficacyandcomplicationsoflongactingandintermediateactinginsulinregimensforadultswithtype1diabetesanindividualpatientdatanetworkmetaanalysis
AT yucatherineh comparativeefficacyandcomplicationsoflongactingandintermediateactinginsulinregimensforadultswithtype1diabetesanindividualpatientdatanetworkmetaanalysis
AT mojalorenzo comparativeefficacyandcomplicationsoflongactingandintermediateactinginsulinregimensforadultswithtype1diabetesanindividualpatientdatanetworkmetaanalysis
AT straussharone comparativeefficacyandcomplicationsoflongactingandintermediateactinginsulinregimensforadultswithtype1diabetesanindividualpatientdatanetworkmetaanalysis
AT triccoandreac comparativeefficacyandcomplicationsoflongactingandintermediateactinginsulinregimensforadultswithtype1diabetesanindividualpatientdatanetworkmetaanalysis