Cargando…

Validating ICD-10 codes for adverse drug events in hospitalised older adults: protocol for a cross-sectional study

INTRODUCTION: Adverse drug events (ADEs) among hospitalised older adults are common yet often preventable. Efforts to recognise ADEs using pharmacist review and electronic health record adaptations have had mixed results. Our health system developed and implemented a geriatric prescribing context de...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nohner, Mitchell, De Lima, Bryanna, Drago, Katie
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9639084/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36323472
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-062853
_version_ 1784825560894013440
author Nohner, Mitchell
De Lima, Bryanna
Drago, Katie
author_facet Nohner, Mitchell
De Lima, Bryanna
Drago, Katie
author_sort Nohner, Mitchell
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Adverse drug events (ADEs) among hospitalised older adults are common yet often preventable. Efforts to recognise ADEs using pharmacist review and electronic health record adaptations have had mixed results. Our health system developed and implemented a geriatric prescribing context designed to offer age-friendly dose and frequency defaults for hospitalised patients 75 years and older. The impact of this context on ADEs remains unknown. To measure its impact, our team created a list of ADE-related International Classification of Diseases (ICD) codes specific to 10 commonly used medications at our institution. This protocol paper presents the process of designing a screening tool for ADEs, validating the tool with manual chart reviews and measuring the impact of the context on ADEs. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This retrospective cross-sectional study will assess our list of ICD-10 codes against manual chart review to determine its accuracy. An electronic health record report for patients aged 75 years and older admitted to the hospital for a minimum of two nights was generated to identify 100 test positives and 100 test negatives. Test positives need at least one code from each level of our ICD-10 code list. The first level of codes identifies any possible ADEs while the second level is more symptom based. Test negatives must not have any code from the list. Two physicians blinded to test status will complete a structured chart review to determine if a patient had an ADE during their hospitalisation. Acceptable inter-rater reliability will need to be met before proceeding with independent chart review. Positive predictive value and negative predictive value will be calculated once all the chart reviews are completed. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The Oregon Health & Science University Institutional Review Board approved this study (#21385). The results of the study will be disseminated in peer-reviewed journals and conference presentations.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9639084
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-96390842022-11-08 Validating ICD-10 codes for adverse drug events in hospitalised older adults: protocol for a cross-sectional study Nohner, Mitchell De Lima, Bryanna Drago, Katie BMJ Open Research Methods INTRODUCTION: Adverse drug events (ADEs) among hospitalised older adults are common yet often preventable. Efforts to recognise ADEs using pharmacist review and electronic health record adaptations have had mixed results. Our health system developed and implemented a geriatric prescribing context designed to offer age-friendly dose and frequency defaults for hospitalised patients 75 years and older. The impact of this context on ADEs remains unknown. To measure its impact, our team created a list of ADE-related International Classification of Diseases (ICD) codes specific to 10 commonly used medications at our institution. This protocol paper presents the process of designing a screening tool for ADEs, validating the tool with manual chart reviews and measuring the impact of the context on ADEs. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This retrospective cross-sectional study will assess our list of ICD-10 codes against manual chart review to determine its accuracy. An electronic health record report for patients aged 75 years and older admitted to the hospital for a minimum of two nights was generated to identify 100 test positives and 100 test negatives. Test positives need at least one code from each level of our ICD-10 code list. The first level of codes identifies any possible ADEs while the second level is more symptom based. Test negatives must not have any code from the list. Two physicians blinded to test status will complete a structured chart review to determine if a patient had an ADE during their hospitalisation. Acceptable inter-rater reliability will need to be met before proceeding with independent chart review. Positive predictive value and negative predictive value will be calculated once all the chart reviews are completed. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The Oregon Health & Science University Institutional Review Board approved this study (#21385). The results of the study will be disseminated in peer-reviewed journals and conference presentations. BMJ Publishing Group 2022-11-02 /pmc/articles/PMC9639084/ /pubmed/36323472 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-062853 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Research Methods
Nohner, Mitchell
De Lima, Bryanna
Drago, Katie
Validating ICD-10 codes for adverse drug events in hospitalised older adults: protocol for a cross-sectional study
title Validating ICD-10 codes for adverse drug events in hospitalised older adults: protocol for a cross-sectional study
title_full Validating ICD-10 codes for adverse drug events in hospitalised older adults: protocol for a cross-sectional study
title_fullStr Validating ICD-10 codes for adverse drug events in hospitalised older adults: protocol for a cross-sectional study
title_full_unstemmed Validating ICD-10 codes for adverse drug events in hospitalised older adults: protocol for a cross-sectional study
title_short Validating ICD-10 codes for adverse drug events in hospitalised older adults: protocol for a cross-sectional study
title_sort validating icd-10 codes for adverse drug events in hospitalised older adults: protocol for a cross-sectional study
topic Research Methods
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9639084/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36323472
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-062853
work_keys_str_mv AT nohnermitchell validatingicd10codesforadversedrugeventsinhospitalisedolderadultsprotocolforacrosssectionalstudy
AT delimabryanna validatingicd10codesforadversedrugeventsinhospitalisedolderadultsprotocolforacrosssectionalstudy
AT dragokatie validatingicd10codesforadversedrugeventsinhospitalisedolderadultsprotocolforacrosssectionalstudy