Cargando…

Is laparoscopic excision for superficial peritoneal endometriosis helpful or harmful? Protocol for a double-blinded, randomised, placebo-controlled, three-armed surgical trial

INTRODUCTION: Placebo-controlled surgical designs are recommended to ascertain treatment effects for elective surgeries when there is genuine doubt about the effectiveness of the surgery. Some elective surgeries for pain have been unable to show an effect beyond sham surgery, suggesting contribution...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Marschall, Henrik, Forman, Axel, Lunde, Sigrid Juhl, Kesmodel, Ulrik Schiøler, Hansen, Karina Ejgaard, Vase, Lene
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9639085/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36328387
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-062808
_version_ 1784825561153011712
author Marschall, Henrik
Forman, Axel
Lunde, Sigrid Juhl
Kesmodel, Ulrik Schiøler
Hansen, Karina Ejgaard
Vase, Lene
author_facet Marschall, Henrik
Forman, Axel
Lunde, Sigrid Juhl
Kesmodel, Ulrik Schiøler
Hansen, Karina Ejgaard
Vase, Lene
author_sort Marschall, Henrik
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Placebo-controlled surgical designs are recommended to ascertain treatment effects for elective surgeries when there is genuine doubt about the effectiveness of the surgery. Some elective surgeries for pain have been unable to show an effect beyond sham surgery, suggesting contributions from contextual factors. However, the nature of contextual factors in elective surgery is largely unexplored. Further, methodological difficulties in placebo-controlled surgical trials impact the ability to estimate the effectiveness of a surgical procedure. These include an overall lack of testing the success of blinding, absence of comparison to a no-surgery control group and dearth of test for neuropathic pain. For women with peritoneal endometriosis, there is uncertainty regarding the pain-relieving effect of surgery. Surgery may put patients at risk of complications such as postsurgical neuropathic pain, without guarantees of sufficient pelvic pain relief. The planned placebo-controlled trial aims to examine the effect of surgery on pelvic pain, widespread pain and neuropathic pain symptoms in women with peritoneal endometriosis, and to test the contribution of contextual factors to pain relief. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: One hundred women with peritoneal endometriosis will be randomised to either diagnostic laparoscopy with excision of endometrial tissue (active surgery), purely diagnostic laparoscopy (sham surgery) or delayed surgery (no-surgery control group). Outcomes include pelvic pain relief, widespread pain, neuropathic pain symptoms and quality of life. Contextual factors are also assessed. Assessments will be obtained at baseline and 1, 3 and 6 months postrandomisation. Mixed linear models will be used to compare groups over time on all outcome variables. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The trial is approved by the Regional Ethics Committee in the Central Denmark Region (1-10-72-152-20). The trial is funded by a PhD scholarship from Aarhus University, and supported by a grant from ‘Helsefonden’ (20-B-0448). Findings will be published in international peer-reviewed journals and disseminated at international conferences. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT05162794.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9639085
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-96390852022-11-08 Is laparoscopic excision for superficial peritoneal endometriosis helpful or harmful? Protocol for a double-blinded, randomised, placebo-controlled, three-armed surgical trial Marschall, Henrik Forman, Axel Lunde, Sigrid Juhl Kesmodel, Ulrik Schiøler Hansen, Karina Ejgaard Vase, Lene BMJ Open Surgery INTRODUCTION: Placebo-controlled surgical designs are recommended to ascertain treatment effects for elective surgeries when there is genuine doubt about the effectiveness of the surgery. Some elective surgeries for pain have been unable to show an effect beyond sham surgery, suggesting contributions from contextual factors. However, the nature of contextual factors in elective surgery is largely unexplored. Further, methodological difficulties in placebo-controlled surgical trials impact the ability to estimate the effectiveness of a surgical procedure. These include an overall lack of testing the success of blinding, absence of comparison to a no-surgery control group and dearth of test for neuropathic pain. For women with peritoneal endometriosis, there is uncertainty regarding the pain-relieving effect of surgery. Surgery may put patients at risk of complications such as postsurgical neuropathic pain, without guarantees of sufficient pelvic pain relief. The planned placebo-controlled trial aims to examine the effect of surgery on pelvic pain, widespread pain and neuropathic pain symptoms in women with peritoneal endometriosis, and to test the contribution of contextual factors to pain relief. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: One hundred women with peritoneal endometriosis will be randomised to either diagnostic laparoscopy with excision of endometrial tissue (active surgery), purely diagnostic laparoscopy (sham surgery) or delayed surgery (no-surgery control group). Outcomes include pelvic pain relief, widespread pain, neuropathic pain symptoms and quality of life. Contextual factors are also assessed. Assessments will be obtained at baseline and 1, 3 and 6 months postrandomisation. Mixed linear models will be used to compare groups over time on all outcome variables. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The trial is approved by the Regional Ethics Committee in the Central Denmark Region (1-10-72-152-20). The trial is funded by a PhD scholarship from Aarhus University, and supported by a grant from ‘Helsefonden’ (20-B-0448). Findings will be published in international peer-reviewed journals and disseminated at international conferences. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT05162794. BMJ Publishing Group 2022-11-03 /pmc/articles/PMC9639085/ /pubmed/36328387 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-062808 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Surgery
Marschall, Henrik
Forman, Axel
Lunde, Sigrid Juhl
Kesmodel, Ulrik Schiøler
Hansen, Karina Ejgaard
Vase, Lene
Is laparoscopic excision for superficial peritoneal endometriosis helpful or harmful? Protocol for a double-blinded, randomised, placebo-controlled, three-armed surgical trial
title Is laparoscopic excision for superficial peritoneal endometriosis helpful or harmful? Protocol for a double-blinded, randomised, placebo-controlled, three-armed surgical trial
title_full Is laparoscopic excision for superficial peritoneal endometriosis helpful or harmful? Protocol for a double-blinded, randomised, placebo-controlled, three-armed surgical trial
title_fullStr Is laparoscopic excision for superficial peritoneal endometriosis helpful or harmful? Protocol for a double-blinded, randomised, placebo-controlled, three-armed surgical trial
title_full_unstemmed Is laparoscopic excision for superficial peritoneal endometriosis helpful or harmful? Protocol for a double-blinded, randomised, placebo-controlled, three-armed surgical trial
title_short Is laparoscopic excision for superficial peritoneal endometriosis helpful or harmful? Protocol for a double-blinded, randomised, placebo-controlled, three-armed surgical trial
title_sort is laparoscopic excision for superficial peritoneal endometriosis helpful or harmful? protocol for a double-blinded, randomised, placebo-controlled, three-armed surgical trial
topic Surgery
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9639085/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36328387
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-062808
work_keys_str_mv AT marschallhenrik islaparoscopicexcisionforsuperficialperitonealendometriosishelpfulorharmfulprotocolforadoubleblindedrandomisedplacebocontrolledthreearmedsurgicaltrial
AT formanaxel islaparoscopicexcisionforsuperficialperitonealendometriosishelpfulorharmfulprotocolforadoubleblindedrandomisedplacebocontrolledthreearmedsurgicaltrial
AT lundesigridjuhl islaparoscopicexcisionforsuperficialperitonealendometriosishelpfulorharmfulprotocolforadoubleblindedrandomisedplacebocontrolledthreearmedsurgicaltrial
AT kesmodelulrikschiøler islaparoscopicexcisionforsuperficialperitonealendometriosishelpfulorharmfulprotocolforadoubleblindedrandomisedplacebocontrolledthreearmedsurgicaltrial
AT hansenkarinaejgaard islaparoscopicexcisionforsuperficialperitonealendometriosishelpfulorharmfulprotocolforadoubleblindedrandomisedplacebocontrolledthreearmedsurgicaltrial
AT vaselene islaparoscopicexcisionforsuperficialperitonealendometriosishelpfulorharmfulprotocolforadoubleblindedrandomisedplacebocontrolledthreearmedsurgicaltrial