Cargando…

Protocol for a systematic review on effective patient positioning for rapid sequence intubation

INTRODUCTION: Rapid sequence intubation (RSI) is an advanced airway technique to perform endotracheal intubation in patients at high risk of aspiration. Although RSI is recognised as a life-saving technique and performed by many physicians in various settings (emergency departments, intensive care u...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sivajohan, Asaanth, Krause, Sarah CT, Hegazy, Ahmed, Slessarev, Marat
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9639087/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36332945
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-062988
_version_ 1784825561890160640
author Sivajohan, Asaanth
Krause, Sarah CT
Hegazy, Ahmed
Slessarev, Marat
author_facet Sivajohan, Asaanth
Krause, Sarah CT
Hegazy, Ahmed
Slessarev, Marat
author_sort Sivajohan, Asaanth
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Rapid sequence intubation (RSI) is an advanced airway technique to perform endotracheal intubation in patients at high risk of aspiration. Although RSI is recognised as a life-saving technique and performed by many physicians in various settings (emergency departments, intensive care units), there is still a lack of consensus on various features of the procedure, most notably patient positioning. Previously, experts have commented on the unique drawbacks and benefits of various positions and studies have been published comparing patient positions and how it can affect endotracheal intubation in the context of RSI. The purpose of this systematic review is to compile the existing evidence to understand and compare how different patient positions can potentially affect the success of RSI. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: We will use MEDLINE, EMBASE and the Cochrane Library to source studies from 1946 to 2021 that evaluate the impact of patient positioning on endotracheal intubation in the context of RSI. We will include randomised control trials, case–control studies, prospective/retrospective cohort studies and mannequin simulation studies for consideration in this systematic review. Subsequently, we will generate a Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses flow diagram to display how we selected our final studies for inclusion in the review. Two independent reviewers will complete the study screening, selection and extraction, with a third reviewer available to address any conflicts. The reviewers will extract this data in accordance with our outcomes of interest and display it in a table format to highlight patient-relevant outcomes and difficulty airway management outcomes. We will use the Risk of Bias tool and the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale to assess included studies for bias. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This systematic review does not require ethics approval, as all patient-centred data will be reported from published studies. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42022289773.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9639087
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-96390872022-11-08 Protocol for a systematic review on effective patient positioning for rapid sequence intubation Sivajohan, Asaanth Krause, Sarah CT Hegazy, Ahmed Slessarev, Marat BMJ Open Anaesthesia INTRODUCTION: Rapid sequence intubation (RSI) is an advanced airway technique to perform endotracheal intubation in patients at high risk of aspiration. Although RSI is recognised as a life-saving technique and performed by many physicians in various settings (emergency departments, intensive care units), there is still a lack of consensus on various features of the procedure, most notably patient positioning. Previously, experts have commented on the unique drawbacks and benefits of various positions and studies have been published comparing patient positions and how it can affect endotracheal intubation in the context of RSI. The purpose of this systematic review is to compile the existing evidence to understand and compare how different patient positions can potentially affect the success of RSI. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: We will use MEDLINE, EMBASE and the Cochrane Library to source studies from 1946 to 2021 that evaluate the impact of patient positioning on endotracheal intubation in the context of RSI. We will include randomised control trials, case–control studies, prospective/retrospective cohort studies and mannequin simulation studies for consideration in this systematic review. Subsequently, we will generate a Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses flow diagram to display how we selected our final studies for inclusion in the review. Two independent reviewers will complete the study screening, selection and extraction, with a third reviewer available to address any conflicts. The reviewers will extract this data in accordance with our outcomes of interest and display it in a table format to highlight patient-relevant outcomes and difficulty airway management outcomes. We will use the Risk of Bias tool and the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale to assess included studies for bias. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This systematic review does not require ethics approval, as all patient-centred data will be reported from published studies. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42022289773. BMJ Publishing Group 2022-11-04 /pmc/articles/PMC9639087/ /pubmed/36332945 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-062988 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Anaesthesia
Sivajohan, Asaanth
Krause, Sarah CT
Hegazy, Ahmed
Slessarev, Marat
Protocol for a systematic review on effective patient positioning for rapid sequence intubation
title Protocol for a systematic review on effective patient positioning for rapid sequence intubation
title_full Protocol for a systematic review on effective patient positioning for rapid sequence intubation
title_fullStr Protocol for a systematic review on effective patient positioning for rapid sequence intubation
title_full_unstemmed Protocol for a systematic review on effective patient positioning for rapid sequence intubation
title_short Protocol for a systematic review on effective patient positioning for rapid sequence intubation
title_sort protocol for a systematic review on effective patient positioning for rapid sequence intubation
topic Anaesthesia
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9639087/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36332945
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-062988
work_keys_str_mv AT sivajohanasaanth protocolforasystematicreviewoneffectivepatientpositioningforrapidsequenceintubation
AT krausesarahct protocolforasystematicreviewoneffectivepatientpositioningforrapidsequenceintubation
AT hegazyahmed protocolforasystematicreviewoneffectivepatientpositioningforrapidsequenceintubation
AT slessarevmarat protocolforasystematicreviewoneffectivepatientpositioningforrapidsequenceintubation