Cargando…

Clinical outcomes of automated versus continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis for end-stage kidney disease: protocol of a systematic review and meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION: An increasing number of studies comparing automated peritoneal dialysis (APD) with continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD) in clinical outcomes have been published since the publication of a systematic review and meta-analysis including three randomised controlled trials in 20...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Shi, Xinmiao, Du, Hui, Zhang, Zhouhang, Zhou, Yun
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9639101/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36323481
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-065795
_version_ 1784825565951295488
author Shi, Xinmiao
Du, Hui
Zhang, Zhouhang
Zhou, Yun
author_facet Shi, Xinmiao
Du, Hui
Zhang, Zhouhang
Zhou, Yun
author_sort Shi, Xinmiao
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: An increasing number of studies comparing automated peritoneal dialysis (APD) with continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD) in clinical outcomes have been published since the publication of a systematic review and meta-analysis including three randomised controlled trials in 2007. We will conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis to explore more clinical outcomes of APD versus CAPD for end-stage kidney disease. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The protocol is conducted following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Protocols guidelines. Three databases—PubMed, EMBASE and the Cochrane Library—will be searched comprehensively from inception to 16 June 2022, without language restriction. Studies reporting clinical outcomes comparing APD with CAPD will be included. Two independent reviewers will screen the titles and abstracts and then obtain and assess full texts of potential relevant articles for eligibility following the inclusion and exclusion criteria. The methodological quality of included observational studies will be assessed by using the Newcastle–Ottawa Scale. The risk of bias of included randomised controlled studies will be assessed by using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool. Relative risk for dichotomous outcomes and standard mean difference for continuous outcomes with corresponding 95% CIs will be pooled for summary effects. Cochrane Q test and I(2) values will be used to assess heterogeneity between studies. To assess and explore the source of heterogeneity, subgroup analyses and sensitivity analyses will be conducted, and meta-regression, funnel plot and Egger’s test will be performed if there are no less than 10 studies. Analyses will be performed using STATA software, V.13.0 (STATA Corporation, College Station, Texas, USA). ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethics approval is not applicable as no personal information is collected from patients. The results will be published in a peer-reviewed journal or disseminated in relevant academic conferences. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42022311401.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9639101
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-96391012022-11-08 Clinical outcomes of automated versus continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis for end-stage kidney disease: protocol of a systematic review and meta-analysis Shi, Xinmiao Du, Hui Zhang, Zhouhang Zhou, Yun BMJ Open Renal Medicine INTRODUCTION: An increasing number of studies comparing automated peritoneal dialysis (APD) with continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD) in clinical outcomes have been published since the publication of a systematic review and meta-analysis including three randomised controlled trials in 2007. We will conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis to explore more clinical outcomes of APD versus CAPD for end-stage kidney disease. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The protocol is conducted following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Protocols guidelines. Three databases—PubMed, EMBASE and the Cochrane Library—will be searched comprehensively from inception to 16 June 2022, without language restriction. Studies reporting clinical outcomes comparing APD with CAPD will be included. Two independent reviewers will screen the titles and abstracts and then obtain and assess full texts of potential relevant articles for eligibility following the inclusion and exclusion criteria. The methodological quality of included observational studies will be assessed by using the Newcastle–Ottawa Scale. The risk of bias of included randomised controlled studies will be assessed by using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool. Relative risk for dichotomous outcomes and standard mean difference for continuous outcomes with corresponding 95% CIs will be pooled for summary effects. Cochrane Q test and I(2) values will be used to assess heterogeneity between studies. To assess and explore the source of heterogeneity, subgroup analyses and sensitivity analyses will be conducted, and meta-regression, funnel plot and Egger’s test will be performed if there are no less than 10 studies. Analyses will be performed using STATA software, V.13.0 (STATA Corporation, College Station, Texas, USA). ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethics approval is not applicable as no personal information is collected from patients. The results will be published in a peer-reviewed journal or disseminated in relevant academic conferences. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42022311401. BMJ Publishing Group 2022-11-02 /pmc/articles/PMC9639101/ /pubmed/36323481 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-065795 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Renal Medicine
Shi, Xinmiao
Du, Hui
Zhang, Zhouhang
Zhou, Yun
Clinical outcomes of automated versus continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis for end-stage kidney disease: protocol of a systematic review and meta-analysis
title Clinical outcomes of automated versus continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis for end-stage kidney disease: protocol of a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full Clinical outcomes of automated versus continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis for end-stage kidney disease: protocol of a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr Clinical outcomes of automated versus continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis for end-stage kidney disease: protocol of a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Clinical outcomes of automated versus continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis for end-stage kidney disease: protocol of a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short Clinical outcomes of automated versus continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis for end-stage kidney disease: protocol of a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort clinical outcomes of automated versus continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis for end-stage kidney disease: protocol of a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Renal Medicine
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9639101/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36323481
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-065795
work_keys_str_mv AT shixinmiao clinicaloutcomesofautomatedversuscontinuousambulatoryperitonealdialysisforendstagekidneydiseaseprotocolofasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT duhui clinicaloutcomesofautomatedversuscontinuousambulatoryperitonealdialysisforendstagekidneydiseaseprotocolofasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT zhangzhouhang clinicaloutcomesofautomatedversuscontinuousambulatoryperitonealdialysisforendstagekidneydiseaseprotocolofasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT zhouyun clinicaloutcomesofautomatedversuscontinuousambulatoryperitonealdialysisforendstagekidneydiseaseprotocolofasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis