Cargando…

Impact of a multifaceted intervention on physicians’ knowledge, attitudes and practices in relation to pharmaceutical incentivisation: protocol for a randomised control trial

INTRODUCTION: In settings where the private sector constitutes a larger part of the health system, profit-gathering can take primacy over patients’ well-being. In their interactions with pharmaceutical companies, private general practitioners (GPs) can experience the conflict of interest (COI), a si...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Noor, Muhammad Naveed, Khan, Mishal, Rahman-Shepherd, Afifah, Siddiqui, Amna Rehana, Khan, Sabeen Sharif, Azam, Iqbal, Shakoor, Sadia, Hasan, Rumina
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9639112/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36332959
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-067233
_version_ 1784825568722681856
author Noor, Muhammad Naveed
Khan, Mishal
Rahman-Shepherd, Afifah
Siddiqui, Amna Rehana
Khan, Sabeen Sharif
Azam, Iqbal
Shakoor, Sadia
Hasan, Rumina
author_facet Noor, Muhammad Naveed
Khan, Mishal
Rahman-Shepherd, Afifah
Siddiqui, Amna Rehana
Khan, Sabeen Sharif
Azam, Iqbal
Shakoor, Sadia
Hasan, Rumina
author_sort Noor, Muhammad Naveed
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: In settings where the private sector constitutes a larger part of the health system, profit-gathering can take primacy over patients’ well-being. In their interactions with pharmaceutical companies, private general practitioners (GPs) can experience the conflict of interest (COI), a situation whereby the impartiality of GPs’ professional decision making may be influenced by secondary interests such as financial gains from prescribing specific pharmaceutical brands. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This study is a randomised controlled trial to assess the impact of a multifaceted intervention on GPs’ medical practice. The study sample consists of 419 registered GPs who own/work in private clinics and will be randomly assigned to intervention and control groups. The intervention group GPs will be exposed to emotive and educational seminars on medical ethics, whereas control group GPs will be given seminars on general medical topics. The primary outcome measure will be GPs’ prescribing practices, whereas the secondary outcome measures will be their knowledge and attitudes regarding COI that arises from pharmaceutical incentivisation. In addition to a novel standardised pharmaceutical representatives (SPSR) method, in which field researchers will simulate pharmaceutical marketing with GPs, presurvey and postsurvey, and qualitative interviewing will be performed to collect data on GPs’ knowledge, attitudes and practices in relation to COI linked with pharmaceutical incentives. Univariate and multivariate statistical analyses will be performed to measure a change in GPs’ knowledge, attitudes and practices, while qualitative analysis will add to our understanding of the quantitative SPSR data. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethics approval has been obtained from the Pakistan National Bioethics Committee (# 4-87/NBC-582/21/1364), the Aga Khan University (# 2020-4759-1129) and the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine (# 26506). We will release results within 6–9 months of the study’s completion. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN12294839.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9639112
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-96391122022-11-08 Impact of a multifaceted intervention on physicians’ knowledge, attitudes and practices in relation to pharmaceutical incentivisation: protocol for a randomised control trial Noor, Muhammad Naveed Khan, Mishal Rahman-Shepherd, Afifah Siddiqui, Amna Rehana Khan, Sabeen Sharif Azam, Iqbal Shakoor, Sadia Hasan, Rumina BMJ Open Health Services Research INTRODUCTION: In settings where the private sector constitutes a larger part of the health system, profit-gathering can take primacy over patients’ well-being. In their interactions with pharmaceutical companies, private general practitioners (GPs) can experience the conflict of interest (COI), a situation whereby the impartiality of GPs’ professional decision making may be influenced by secondary interests such as financial gains from prescribing specific pharmaceutical brands. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This study is a randomised controlled trial to assess the impact of a multifaceted intervention on GPs’ medical practice. The study sample consists of 419 registered GPs who own/work in private clinics and will be randomly assigned to intervention and control groups. The intervention group GPs will be exposed to emotive and educational seminars on medical ethics, whereas control group GPs will be given seminars on general medical topics. The primary outcome measure will be GPs’ prescribing practices, whereas the secondary outcome measures will be their knowledge and attitudes regarding COI that arises from pharmaceutical incentivisation. In addition to a novel standardised pharmaceutical representatives (SPSR) method, in which field researchers will simulate pharmaceutical marketing with GPs, presurvey and postsurvey, and qualitative interviewing will be performed to collect data on GPs’ knowledge, attitudes and practices in relation to COI linked with pharmaceutical incentives. Univariate and multivariate statistical analyses will be performed to measure a change in GPs’ knowledge, attitudes and practices, while qualitative analysis will add to our understanding of the quantitative SPSR data. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethics approval has been obtained from the Pakistan National Bioethics Committee (# 4-87/NBC-582/21/1364), the Aga Khan University (# 2020-4759-1129) and the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine (# 26506). We will release results within 6–9 months of the study’s completion. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN12294839. BMJ Publishing Group 2022-11-04 /pmc/articles/PMC9639112/ /pubmed/36332959 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-067233 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Health Services Research
Noor, Muhammad Naveed
Khan, Mishal
Rahman-Shepherd, Afifah
Siddiqui, Amna Rehana
Khan, Sabeen Sharif
Azam, Iqbal
Shakoor, Sadia
Hasan, Rumina
Impact of a multifaceted intervention on physicians’ knowledge, attitudes and practices in relation to pharmaceutical incentivisation: protocol for a randomised control trial
title Impact of a multifaceted intervention on physicians’ knowledge, attitudes and practices in relation to pharmaceutical incentivisation: protocol for a randomised control trial
title_full Impact of a multifaceted intervention on physicians’ knowledge, attitudes and practices in relation to pharmaceutical incentivisation: protocol for a randomised control trial
title_fullStr Impact of a multifaceted intervention on physicians’ knowledge, attitudes and practices in relation to pharmaceutical incentivisation: protocol for a randomised control trial
title_full_unstemmed Impact of a multifaceted intervention on physicians’ knowledge, attitudes and practices in relation to pharmaceutical incentivisation: protocol for a randomised control trial
title_short Impact of a multifaceted intervention on physicians’ knowledge, attitudes and practices in relation to pharmaceutical incentivisation: protocol for a randomised control trial
title_sort impact of a multifaceted intervention on physicians’ knowledge, attitudes and practices in relation to pharmaceutical incentivisation: protocol for a randomised control trial
topic Health Services Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9639112/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36332959
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-067233
work_keys_str_mv AT noormuhammadnaveed impactofamultifacetedinterventiononphysiciansknowledgeattitudesandpracticesinrelationtopharmaceuticalincentivisationprotocolforarandomisedcontroltrial
AT khanmishal impactofamultifacetedinterventiononphysiciansknowledgeattitudesandpracticesinrelationtopharmaceuticalincentivisationprotocolforarandomisedcontroltrial
AT rahmanshepherdafifah impactofamultifacetedinterventiononphysiciansknowledgeattitudesandpracticesinrelationtopharmaceuticalincentivisationprotocolforarandomisedcontroltrial
AT siddiquiamnarehana impactofamultifacetedinterventiononphysiciansknowledgeattitudesandpracticesinrelationtopharmaceuticalincentivisationprotocolforarandomisedcontroltrial
AT khansabeensharif impactofamultifacetedinterventiononphysiciansknowledgeattitudesandpracticesinrelationtopharmaceuticalincentivisationprotocolforarandomisedcontroltrial
AT azamiqbal impactofamultifacetedinterventiononphysiciansknowledgeattitudesandpracticesinrelationtopharmaceuticalincentivisationprotocolforarandomisedcontroltrial
AT shakoorsadia impactofamultifacetedinterventiononphysiciansknowledgeattitudesandpracticesinrelationtopharmaceuticalincentivisationprotocolforarandomisedcontroltrial
AT hasanrumina impactofamultifacetedinterventiononphysiciansknowledgeattitudesandpracticesinrelationtopharmaceuticalincentivisationprotocolforarandomisedcontroltrial