Cargando…
Impact of a multifaceted intervention on physicians’ knowledge, attitudes and practices in relation to pharmaceutical incentivisation: protocol for a randomised control trial
INTRODUCTION: In settings where the private sector constitutes a larger part of the health system, profit-gathering can take primacy over patients’ well-being. In their interactions with pharmaceutical companies, private general practitioners (GPs) can experience the conflict of interest (COI), a si...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9639112/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36332959 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-067233 |
_version_ | 1784825568722681856 |
---|---|
author | Noor, Muhammad Naveed Khan, Mishal Rahman-Shepherd, Afifah Siddiqui, Amna Rehana Khan, Sabeen Sharif Azam, Iqbal Shakoor, Sadia Hasan, Rumina |
author_facet | Noor, Muhammad Naveed Khan, Mishal Rahman-Shepherd, Afifah Siddiqui, Amna Rehana Khan, Sabeen Sharif Azam, Iqbal Shakoor, Sadia Hasan, Rumina |
author_sort | Noor, Muhammad Naveed |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: In settings where the private sector constitutes a larger part of the health system, profit-gathering can take primacy over patients’ well-being. In their interactions with pharmaceutical companies, private general practitioners (GPs) can experience the conflict of interest (COI), a situation whereby the impartiality of GPs’ professional decision making may be influenced by secondary interests such as financial gains from prescribing specific pharmaceutical brands. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This study is a randomised controlled trial to assess the impact of a multifaceted intervention on GPs’ medical practice. The study sample consists of 419 registered GPs who own/work in private clinics and will be randomly assigned to intervention and control groups. The intervention group GPs will be exposed to emotive and educational seminars on medical ethics, whereas control group GPs will be given seminars on general medical topics. The primary outcome measure will be GPs’ prescribing practices, whereas the secondary outcome measures will be their knowledge and attitudes regarding COI that arises from pharmaceutical incentivisation. In addition to a novel standardised pharmaceutical representatives (SPSR) method, in which field researchers will simulate pharmaceutical marketing with GPs, presurvey and postsurvey, and qualitative interviewing will be performed to collect data on GPs’ knowledge, attitudes and practices in relation to COI linked with pharmaceutical incentives. Univariate and multivariate statistical analyses will be performed to measure a change in GPs’ knowledge, attitudes and practices, while qualitative analysis will add to our understanding of the quantitative SPSR data. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethics approval has been obtained from the Pakistan National Bioethics Committee (# 4-87/NBC-582/21/1364), the Aga Khan University (# 2020-4759-1129) and the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine (# 26506). We will release results within 6–9 months of the study’s completion. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN12294839. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9639112 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-96391122022-11-08 Impact of a multifaceted intervention on physicians’ knowledge, attitudes and practices in relation to pharmaceutical incentivisation: protocol for a randomised control trial Noor, Muhammad Naveed Khan, Mishal Rahman-Shepherd, Afifah Siddiqui, Amna Rehana Khan, Sabeen Sharif Azam, Iqbal Shakoor, Sadia Hasan, Rumina BMJ Open Health Services Research INTRODUCTION: In settings where the private sector constitutes a larger part of the health system, profit-gathering can take primacy over patients’ well-being. In their interactions with pharmaceutical companies, private general practitioners (GPs) can experience the conflict of interest (COI), a situation whereby the impartiality of GPs’ professional decision making may be influenced by secondary interests such as financial gains from prescribing specific pharmaceutical brands. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This study is a randomised controlled trial to assess the impact of a multifaceted intervention on GPs’ medical practice. The study sample consists of 419 registered GPs who own/work in private clinics and will be randomly assigned to intervention and control groups. The intervention group GPs will be exposed to emotive and educational seminars on medical ethics, whereas control group GPs will be given seminars on general medical topics. The primary outcome measure will be GPs’ prescribing practices, whereas the secondary outcome measures will be their knowledge and attitudes regarding COI that arises from pharmaceutical incentivisation. In addition to a novel standardised pharmaceutical representatives (SPSR) method, in which field researchers will simulate pharmaceutical marketing with GPs, presurvey and postsurvey, and qualitative interviewing will be performed to collect data on GPs’ knowledge, attitudes and practices in relation to COI linked with pharmaceutical incentives. Univariate and multivariate statistical analyses will be performed to measure a change in GPs’ knowledge, attitudes and practices, while qualitative analysis will add to our understanding of the quantitative SPSR data. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethics approval has been obtained from the Pakistan National Bioethics Committee (# 4-87/NBC-582/21/1364), the Aga Khan University (# 2020-4759-1129) and the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine (# 26506). We will release results within 6–9 months of the study’s completion. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN12294839. BMJ Publishing Group 2022-11-04 /pmc/articles/PMC9639112/ /pubmed/36332959 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-067233 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Health Services Research Noor, Muhammad Naveed Khan, Mishal Rahman-Shepherd, Afifah Siddiqui, Amna Rehana Khan, Sabeen Sharif Azam, Iqbal Shakoor, Sadia Hasan, Rumina Impact of a multifaceted intervention on physicians’ knowledge, attitudes and practices in relation to pharmaceutical incentivisation: protocol for a randomised control trial |
title | Impact of a multifaceted intervention on physicians’ knowledge, attitudes and practices in relation to pharmaceutical incentivisation: protocol for a randomised control trial |
title_full | Impact of a multifaceted intervention on physicians’ knowledge, attitudes and practices in relation to pharmaceutical incentivisation: protocol for a randomised control trial |
title_fullStr | Impact of a multifaceted intervention on physicians’ knowledge, attitudes and practices in relation to pharmaceutical incentivisation: protocol for a randomised control trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Impact of a multifaceted intervention on physicians’ knowledge, attitudes and practices in relation to pharmaceutical incentivisation: protocol for a randomised control trial |
title_short | Impact of a multifaceted intervention on physicians’ knowledge, attitudes and practices in relation to pharmaceutical incentivisation: protocol for a randomised control trial |
title_sort | impact of a multifaceted intervention on physicians’ knowledge, attitudes and practices in relation to pharmaceutical incentivisation: protocol for a randomised control trial |
topic | Health Services Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9639112/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36332959 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-067233 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT noormuhammadnaveed impactofamultifacetedinterventiononphysiciansknowledgeattitudesandpracticesinrelationtopharmaceuticalincentivisationprotocolforarandomisedcontroltrial AT khanmishal impactofamultifacetedinterventiononphysiciansknowledgeattitudesandpracticesinrelationtopharmaceuticalincentivisationprotocolforarandomisedcontroltrial AT rahmanshepherdafifah impactofamultifacetedinterventiononphysiciansknowledgeattitudesandpracticesinrelationtopharmaceuticalincentivisationprotocolforarandomisedcontroltrial AT siddiquiamnarehana impactofamultifacetedinterventiononphysiciansknowledgeattitudesandpracticesinrelationtopharmaceuticalincentivisationprotocolforarandomisedcontroltrial AT khansabeensharif impactofamultifacetedinterventiononphysiciansknowledgeattitudesandpracticesinrelationtopharmaceuticalincentivisationprotocolforarandomisedcontroltrial AT azamiqbal impactofamultifacetedinterventiononphysiciansknowledgeattitudesandpracticesinrelationtopharmaceuticalincentivisationprotocolforarandomisedcontroltrial AT shakoorsadia impactofamultifacetedinterventiononphysiciansknowledgeattitudesandpracticesinrelationtopharmaceuticalincentivisationprotocolforarandomisedcontroltrial AT hasanrumina impactofamultifacetedinterventiononphysiciansknowledgeattitudesandpracticesinrelationtopharmaceuticalincentivisationprotocolforarandomisedcontroltrial |