Cargando…
Patient experiences of codesigned rehabilitation interventions in hospitals: a rapid review
BACKGROUND: Codesign strengthens partnerships between healthcare workers and patients. It also facilitates collaborations supporting the development, design and delivery of healthcare services. Prior rehabilitation reviews have focused mainly on the clinical and organisational outcomes of codesign w...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9639115/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36332956 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-068241 |
_version_ | 1784825569496530944 |
---|---|
author | McKercher, Jonathan P Slade, Susan C Jazayeri, Jalal A Hodge, Anita Knight, Matthew Green, Janet Woods, Jeffrey Thwaites, Claire Morris, Meg E |
author_facet | McKercher, Jonathan P Slade, Susan C Jazayeri, Jalal A Hodge, Anita Knight, Matthew Green, Janet Woods, Jeffrey Thwaites, Claire Morris, Meg E |
author_sort | McKercher, Jonathan P |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Codesign strengthens partnerships between healthcare workers and patients. It also facilitates collaborations supporting the development, design and delivery of healthcare services. Prior rehabilitation reviews have focused mainly on the clinical and organisational outcomes of codesign with less focus on the lived experience of rehabilitation patients. OBJECTIVE: To explore patient experiences of codesigned hospital rehabilitation interventions. DESIGN: Rapid review and evidence synthesis of the literature. DATA SOURCES: CINAHL, MEDLINE, Embase and Cochrane were searched from 1 January 2000 to 25 April 2022. STUDY SELECTION: Studies reporting patient experiences of codesigned rehabilitation interventions in hospitals. RESULTS: 4156 studies were screened, and 38 full-text studies were assessed for eligibility. Seven studies were included in the final rapid review. Five out of the seven studies involved neurological rehabilitation. All eligible studies used qualitative research methods. The main barriers to codesign were related to staffing and dedicated time allocated to face-to-face patient-therapist interactions. High-quality relationships between patients and their therapists were a facilitator of codesign. Thematic synthesis revealed that codesigned rehabilitation interventions can enable a meaningful experience for patients and facilitate tailoring of treatments to align with individual needs. Personalised rehabilitation increases patient involvement in rehabilitation planning, delivery and decision-making. It also promotes positive feelings of empowerment and hope. CONCLUSION: This rapid review supports the implementation of codesigned rehabilitation interventions to improve patient experiences in hospitals. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42021264547. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9639115 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-96391152022-11-08 Patient experiences of codesigned rehabilitation interventions in hospitals: a rapid review McKercher, Jonathan P Slade, Susan C Jazayeri, Jalal A Hodge, Anita Knight, Matthew Green, Janet Woods, Jeffrey Thwaites, Claire Morris, Meg E BMJ Open Rehabilitation Medicine BACKGROUND: Codesign strengthens partnerships between healthcare workers and patients. It also facilitates collaborations supporting the development, design and delivery of healthcare services. Prior rehabilitation reviews have focused mainly on the clinical and organisational outcomes of codesign with less focus on the lived experience of rehabilitation patients. OBJECTIVE: To explore patient experiences of codesigned hospital rehabilitation interventions. DESIGN: Rapid review and evidence synthesis of the literature. DATA SOURCES: CINAHL, MEDLINE, Embase and Cochrane were searched from 1 January 2000 to 25 April 2022. STUDY SELECTION: Studies reporting patient experiences of codesigned rehabilitation interventions in hospitals. RESULTS: 4156 studies were screened, and 38 full-text studies were assessed for eligibility. Seven studies were included in the final rapid review. Five out of the seven studies involved neurological rehabilitation. All eligible studies used qualitative research methods. The main barriers to codesign were related to staffing and dedicated time allocated to face-to-face patient-therapist interactions. High-quality relationships between patients and their therapists were a facilitator of codesign. Thematic synthesis revealed that codesigned rehabilitation interventions can enable a meaningful experience for patients and facilitate tailoring of treatments to align with individual needs. Personalised rehabilitation increases patient involvement in rehabilitation planning, delivery and decision-making. It also promotes positive feelings of empowerment and hope. CONCLUSION: This rapid review supports the implementation of codesigned rehabilitation interventions to improve patient experiences in hospitals. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42021264547. BMJ Publishing Group 2022-11-04 /pmc/articles/PMC9639115/ /pubmed/36332956 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-068241 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Rehabilitation Medicine McKercher, Jonathan P Slade, Susan C Jazayeri, Jalal A Hodge, Anita Knight, Matthew Green, Janet Woods, Jeffrey Thwaites, Claire Morris, Meg E Patient experiences of codesigned rehabilitation interventions in hospitals: a rapid review |
title | Patient experiences of codesigned rehabilitation interventions in hospitals: a rapid review |
title_full | Patient experiences of codesigned rehabilitation interventions in hospitals: a rapid review |
title_fullStr | Patient experiences of codesigned rehabilitation interventions in hospitals: a rapid review |
title_full_unstemmed | Patient experiences of codesigned rehabilitation interventions in hospitals: a rapid review |
title_short | Patient experiences of codesigned rehabilitation interventions in hospitals: a rapid review |
title_sort | patient experiences of codesigned rehabilitation interventions in hospitals: a rapid review |
topic | Rehabilitation Medicine |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9639115/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36332956 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-068241 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mckercherjonathanp patientexperiencesofcodesignedrehabilitationinterventionsinhospitalsarapidreview AT sladesusanc patientexperiencesofcodesignedrehabilitationinterventionsinhospitalsarapidreview AT jazayerijalala patientexperiencesofcodesignedrehabilitationinterventionsinhospitalsarapidreview AT hodgeanita patientexperiencesofcodesignedrehabilitationinterventionsinhospitalsarapidreview AT knightmatthew patientexperiencesofcodesignedrehabilitationinterventionsinhospitalsarapidreview AT greenjanet patientexperiencesofcodesignedrehabilitationinterventionsinhospitalsarapidreview AT woodsjeffrey patientexperiencesofcodesignedrehabilitationinterventionsinhospitalsarapidreview AT thwaitesclaire patientexperiencesofcodesignedrehabilitationinterventionsinhospitalsarapidreview AT morrismege patientexperiencesofcodesignedrehabilitationinterventionsinhospitalsarapidreview |