Cargando…
FRACTION-RCC: nivolumab plus ipilimumab for advanced renal cell carcinoma after progression on immuno-oncology therapy
BACKGROUND: The role and sequencing of combination immuno-oncology (IO) therapy following progression on or after first-line IO therapy has not been well-established. The Fast Real-time Assessment of Combination Therapies in Immuno-ONcology (FRACTION) program is an open-label, phase 2 platform trial...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9639138/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36328377 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/jitc-2022-005780 |
_version_ | 1784825575597146112 |
---|---|
author | Choueiri, Toni K Kluger, Harriet George, Saby Tykodi, Scott S Kuzel, Timothy M Perets, Ruth Nair, Suresh Procopio, Giuseppe Carducci, Michael A Castonguay, Vincent Folefac, Edmund Lee, Chung-Han Hotte, Sebastien J. Miller,, Wilson H Saggi, Shruti Shally Lee, Chung-Wei Desilva, Heshani Bhagavatheeswaran, Prabhu Motzer, Robert J Escudier, Bernard |
author_facet | Choueiri, Toni K Kluger, Harriet George, Saby Tykodi, Scott S Kuzel, Timothy M Perets, Ruth Nair, Suresh Procopio, Giuseppe Carducci, Michael A Castonguay, Vincent Folefac, Edmund Lee, Chung-Han Hotte, Sebastien J. Miller,, Wilson H Saggi, Shruti Shally Lee, Chung-Wei Desilva, Heshani Bhagavatheeswaran, Prabhu Motzer, Robert J Escudier, Bernard |
author_sort | Choueiri, Toni K |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The role and sequencing of combination immuno-oncology (IO) therapy following progression on or after first-line IO therapy has not been well-established. The Fast Real-time Assessment of Combination Therapies in Immuno-ONcology (FRACTION) program is an open-label, phase 2 platform trial designed to evaluate multiple IO combinations in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma (aRCC) who progressed during or after prior IO therapy. Here, we describe the results for patients treated with nivolumab plus ipilimumab. For enrollment in track 2 (reported here), patients with histologically confirmed clear cell aRCC, Karnofsky performance status ≥70%, and life expectancy ≥3 months who had previously progressed after IO (anti-programmed death 1 (PD-1), anti-programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1), or anti-cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen 4 (CTLA-4)) therapy were eligible. Previous treatment with anti-CTLA-4 therapy plus anti-PD-1/PD-L1 therapy precluded eligibility for enrollment in the nivolumab plus ipilimumab arm. Patients were treated with nivolumab 3 mg/kg plus ipilimumab 1 mg/kg every 3 weeks for four doses, followed by nivolumab 480 mg every 4 weeks for up to 2 years or until progression, toxicity, or protocol-specified discontinuation. The primary outcome measures were objective response rate (ORR), duration of response (DOR), and progression-free survival (PFS) rate at 24 weeks. Secondary outcomes were safety and tolerability up to 2 years. Overall survival (OS) was a tertiary/exploratory endpoint. Overall, 46 patients were included with a median follow-up of 33.8 months. The ORR was 17.4% (95% CI, 7.8 to 31.4) with eight (17.4%) patients achieving partial response. Stable disease was achieved in 19 (41.3%) patients, while 14 (30.4%) had progressive disease. Median DOR (range) was 16.4 (2.1+ to 27.0+) months. The PFS rate at 24 weeks was 43.2%, and median OS was 23.8 (95% CI, 13.2 to not reached) months. Grade 3–4 immune-mediated adverse events were reported in seven (15.2%) patients. No treatment-related deaths were reported. Patients with aRCC treated with nivolumab plus ipilimumab may derive durable clinical benefit after progression on previous IO therapies, including heavily pretreated patients, with a manageable safety profile that was consistent with previously published safety outcomes. These outcomes contribute to the knowledge of optimal sequencing of IO therapies for patients with aRCC with high unmet needs. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT02996110. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9639138 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-96391382022-11-08 FRACTION-RCC: nivolumab plus ipilimumab for advanced renal cell carcinoma after progression on immuno-oncology therapy Choueiri, Toni K Kluger, Harriet George, Saby Tykodi, Scott S Kuzel, Timothy M Perets, Ruth Nair, Suresh Procopio, Giuseppe Carducci, Michael A Castonguay, Vincent Folefac, Edmund Lee, Chung-Han Hotte, Sebastien J. Miller,, Wilson H Saggi, Shruti Shally Lee, Chung-Wei Desilva, Heshani Bhagavatheeswaran, Prabhu Motzer, Robert J Escudier, Bernard J Immunother Cancer Clinical/Translational Cancer Immunotherapy BACKGROUND: The role and sequencing of combination immuno-oncology (IO) therapy following progression on or after first-line IO therapy has not been well-established. The Fast Real-time Assessment of Combination Therapies in Immuno-ONcology (FRACTION) program is an open-label, phase 2 platform trial designed to evaluate multiple IO combinations in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma (aRCC) who progressed during or after prior IO therapy. Here, we describe the results for patients treated with nivolumab plus ipilimumab. For enrollment in track 2 (reported here), patients with histologically confirmed clear cell aRCC, Karnofsky performance status ≥70%, and life expectancy ≥3 months who had previously progressed after IO (anti-programmed death 1 (PD-1), anti-programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1), or anti-cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen 4 (CTLA-4)) therapy were eligible. Previous treatment with anti-CTLA-4 therapy plus anti-PD-1/PD-L1 therapy precluded eligibility for enrollment in the nivolumab plus ipilimumab arm. Patients were treated with nivolumab 3 mg/kg plus ipilimumab 1 mg/kg every 3 weeks for four doses, followed by nivolumab 480 mg every 4 weeks for up to 2 years or until progression, toxicity, or protocol-specified discontinuation. The primary outcome measures were objective response rate (ORR), duration of response (DOR), and progression-free survival (PFS) rate at 24 weeks. Secondary outcomes were safety and tolerability up to 2 years. Overall survival (OS) was a tertiary/exploratory endpoint. Overall, 46 patients were included with a median follow-up of 33.8 months. The ORR was 17.4% (95% CI, 7.8 to 31.4) with eight (17.4%) patients achieving partial response. Stable disease was achieved in 19 (41.3%) patients, while 14 (30.4%) had progressive disease. Median DOR (range) was 16.4 (2.1+ to 27.0+) months. The PFS rate at 24 weeks was 43.2%, and median OS was 23.8 (95% CI, 13.2 to not reached) months. Grade 3–4 immune-mediated adverse events were reported in seven (15.2%) patients. No treatment-related deaths were reported. Patients with aRCC treated with nivolumab plus ipilimumab may derive durable clinical benefit after progression on previous IO therapies, including heavily pretreated patients, with a manageable safety profile that was consistent with previously published safety outcomes. These outcomes contribute to the knowledge of optimal sequencing of IO therapies for patients with aRCC with high unmet needs. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT02996110. BMJ Publishing Group 2022-11-03 /pmc/articles/PMC9639138/ /pubmed/36328377 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/jitc-2022-005780 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Clinical/Translational Cancer Immunotherapy Choueiri, Toni K Kluger, Harriet George, Saby Tykodi, Scott S Kuzel, Timothy M Perets, Ruth Nair, Suresh Procopio, Giuseppe Carducci, Michael A Castonguay, Vincent Folefac, Edmund Lee, Chung-Han Hotte, Sebastien J. Miller,, Wilson H Saggi, Shruti Shally Lee, Chung-Wei Desilva, Heshani Bhagavatheeswaran, Prabhu Motzer, Robert J Escudier, Bernard FRACTION-RCC: nivolumab plus ipilimumab for advanced renal cell carcinoma after progression on immuno-oncology therapy |
title | FRACTION-RCC: nivolumab plus ipilimumab for advanced renal cell carcinoma after progression on immuno-oncology therapy |
title_full | FRACTION-RCC: nivolumab plus ipilimumab for advanced renal cell carcinoma after progression on immuno-oncology therapy |
title_fullStr | FRACTION-RCC: nivolumab plus ipilimumab for advanced renal cell carcinoma after progression on immuno-oncology therapy |
title_full_unstemmed | FRACTION-RCC: nivolumab plus ipilimumab for advanced renal cell carcinoma after progression on immuno-oncology therapy |
title_short | FRACTION-RCC: nivolumab plus ipilimumab for advanced renal cell carcinoma after progression on immuno-oncology therapy |
title_sort | fraction-rcc: nivolumab plus ipilimumab for advanced renal cell carcinoma after progression on immuno-oncology therapy |
topic | Clinical/Translational Cancer Immunotherapy |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9639138/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36328377 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/jitc-2022-005780 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT choueiritonik fractionrccnivolumabplusipilimumabforadvancedrenalcellcarcinomaafterprogressiononimmunooncologytherapy AT klugerharriet fractionrccnivolumabplusipilimumabforadvancedrenalcellcarcinomaafterprogressiononimmunooncologytherapy AT georgesaby fractionrccnivolumabplusipilimumabforadvancedrenalcellcarcinomaafterprogressiononimmunooncologytherapy AT tykodiscotts fractionrccnivolumabplusipilimumabforadvancedrenalcellcarcinomaafterprogressiononimmunooncologytherapy AT kuzeltimothym fractionrccnivolumabplusipilimumabforadvancedrenalcellcarcinomaafterprogressiononimmunooncologytherapy AT peretsruth fractionrccnivolumabplusipilimumabforadvancedrenalcellcarcinomaafterprogressiononimmunooncologytherapy AT nairsuresh fractionrccnivolumabplusipilimumabforadvancedrenalcellcarcinomaafterprogressiononimmunooncologytherapy AT procopiogiuseppe fractionrccnivolumabplusipilimumabforadvancedrenalcellcarcinomaafterprogressiononimmunooncologytherapy AT carduccimichaela fractionrccnivolumabplusipilimumabforadvancedrenalcellcarcinomaafterprogressiononimmunooncologytherapy AT castonguayvincent fractionrccnivolumabplusipilimumabforadvancedrenalcellcarcinomaafterprogressiononimmunooncologytherapy AT folefacedmund fractionrccnivolumabplusipilimumabforadvancedrenalcellcarcinomaafterprogressiononimmunooncologytherapy AT leechunghan fractionrccnivolumabplusipilimumabforadvancedrenalcellcarcinomaafterprogressiononimmunooncologytherapy AT hottesebastienj fractionrccnivolumabplusipilimumabforadvancedrenalcellcarcinomaafterprogressiononimmunooncologytherapy AT millerwilsonh fractionrccnivolumabplusipilimumabforadvancedrenalcellcarcinomaafterprogressiononimmunooncologytherapy AT saggishrutishally fractionrccnivolumabplusipilimumabforadvancedrenalcellcarcinomaafterprogressiononimmunooncologytherapy AT leechungwei fractionrccnivolumabplusipilimumabforadvancedrenalcellcarcinomaafterprogressiononimmunooncologytherapy AT desilvaheshani fractionrccnivolumabplusipilimumabforadvancedrenalcellcarcinomaafterprogressiononimmunooncologytherapy AT bhagavatheeswaranprabhu fractionrccnivolumabplusipilimumabforadvancedrenalcellcarcinomaafterprogressiononimmunooncologytherapy AT motzerrobertj fractionrccnivolumabplusipilimumabforadvancedrenalcellcarcinomaafterprogressiononimmunooncologytherapy AT escudierbernard fractionrccnivolumabplusipilimumabforadvancedrenalcellcarcinomaafterprogressiononimmunooncologytherapy |