Cargando…
Morphometric analysis of patient-specific 3D-printed acetabular cups: a comparative study of commercially available implants from 6 manufacturers
BACKGROUND: 3D printed patient-specific titanium acetabular cups are used to treat patients with massive acetabular defects. These have highly porous surfaces, with the design intent of enhancing bony fixation. Our aim was to characterise these porous structures in commercially available designs. ME...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer International Publishing
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9639285/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36342573 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41205-022-00160-w |
_version_ | 1784825602630483968 |
---|---|
author | Hothi, Harry Henckel, Johann Bergiers, Sean Di Laura, Anna Schlueter-Brust, Klaus Hart, Alister |
author_facet | Hothi, Harry Henckel, Johann Bergiers, Sean Di Laura, Anna Schlueter-Brust, Klaus Hart, Alister |
author_sort | Hothi, Harry |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: 3D printed patient-specific titanium acetabular cups are used to treat patients with massive acetabular defects. These have highly porous surfaces, with the design intent of enhancing bony fixation. Our aim was to characterise these porous structures in commercially available designs. METHODS: We obtained 12 final-production, patient-specific 3D printed acetabular cups that had been produced by 6 manufacturers. High resolution micro-CT imaging was used to characterise morphometric features of their porous structures: (1) strut thickness, 2) the depth of the porous layer, (3) pore size and (4) the level of porosity. Additionally, we computed the surface area of each component to quantify how much titanium may be in contact with patient tissue. Statistical comparisons were made between the designs. RESULTS: We found a variability between designs in relation to the thickness of the struts (0.28 to 0.65 mm), how deep the porous layers are (0.57 to 11.51 mm), the pore size (0.74 to 1.87 mm) and the level of porosity (34 to 85%). One manufacturer printed structures with different porosities between the body and flange; another manufacturer had two differing porous regions within the body of the cups. The cups had a median (range) surface area of 756.5 mm(2) (348 – 1724). CONCLUSIONS: There is a wide variability between manufacturers in the porous titanium structures they 3D print. We do not currently know whether there is an optimal porosity and how this variability will impact clinically on the integrity of bony fixation; this will become clearer as post market surveillance data is generated. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9639285 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Springer International Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-96392852022-11-08 Morphometric analysis of patient-specific 3D-printed acetabular cups: a comparative study of commercially available implants from 6 manufacturers Hothi, Harry Henckel, Johann Bergiers, Sean Di Laura, Anna Schlueter-Brust, Klaus Hart, Alister 3D Print Med Research BACKGROUND: 3D printed patient-specific titanium acetabular cups are used to treat patients with massive acetabular defects. These have highly porous surfaces, with the design intent of enhancing bony fixation. Our aim was to characterise these porous structures in commercially available designs. METHODS: We obtained 12 final-production, patient-specific 3D printed acetabular cups that had been produced by 6 manufacturers. High resolution micro-CT imaging was used to characterise morphometric features of their porous structures: (1) strut thickness, 2) the depth of the porous layer, (3) pore size and (4) the level of porosity. Additionally, we computed the surface area of each component to quantify how much titanium may be in contact with patient tissue. Statistical comparisons were made between the designs. RESULTS: We found a variability between designs in relation to the thickness of the struts (0.28 to 0.65 mm), how deep the porous layers are (0.57 to 11.51 mm), the pore size (0.74 to 1.87 mm) and the level of porosity (34 to 85%). One manufacturer printed structures with different porosities between the body and flange; another manufacturer had two differing porous regions within the body of the cups. The cups had a median (range) surface area of 756.5 mm(2) (348 – 1724). CONCLUSIONS: There is a wide variability between manufacturers in the porous titanium structures they 3D print. We do not currently know whether there is an optimal porosity and how this variability will impact clinically on the integrity of bony fixation; this will become clearer as post market surveillance data is generated. Springer International Publishing 2022-11-07 /pmc/articles/PMC9639285/ /pubmed/36342573 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41205-022-00160-w Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Hothi, Harry Henckel, Johann Bergiers, Sean Di Laura, Anna Schlueter-Brust, Klaus Hart, Alister Morphometric analysis of patient-specific 3D-printed acetabular cups: a comparative study of commercially available implants from 6 manufacturers |
title | Morphometric analysis of patient-specific 3D-printed acetabular cups: a comparative study of commercially available implants from 6 manufacturers |
title_full | Morphometric analysis of patient-specific 3D-printed acetabular cups: a comparative study of commercially available implants from 6 manufacturers |
title_fullStr | Morphometric analysis of patient-specific 3D-printed acetabular cups: a comparative study of commercially available implants from 6 manufacturers |
title_full_unstemmed | Morphometric analysis of patient-specific 3D-printed acetabular cups: a comparative study of commercially available implants from 6 manufacturers |
title_short | Morphometric analysis of patient-specific 3D-printed acetabular cups: a comparative study of commercially available implants from 6 manufacturers |
title_sort | morphometric analysis of patient-specific 3d-printed acetabular cups: a comparative study of commercially available implants from 6 manufacturers |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9639285/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36342573 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41205-022-00160-w |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hothiharry morphometricanalysisofpatientspecific3dprintedacetabularcupsacomparativestudyofcommerciallyavailableimplantsfrom6manufacturers AT henckeljohann morphometricanalysisofpatientspecific3dprintedacetabularcupsacomparativestudyofcommerciallyavailableimplantsfrom6manufacturers AT bergierssean morphometricanalysisofpatientspecific3dprintedacetabularcupsacomparativestudyofcommerciallyavailableimplantsfrom6manufacturers AT dilauraanna morphometricanalysisofpatientspecific3dprintedacetabularcupsacomparativestudyofcommerciallyavailableimplantsfrom6manufacturers AT schlueterbrustklaus morphometricanalysisofpatientspecific3dprintedacetabularcupsacomparativestudyofcommerciallyavailableimplantsfrom6manufacturers AT hartalister morphometricanalysisofpatientspecific3dprintedacetabularcupsacomparativestudyofcommerciallyavailableimplantsfrom6manufacturers |