Cargando…
Real-world evidence on siponimod treatment in patients with secondary progressive multiple sclerosis
BACKGROUND: Therapeutic options targeting inflammation in multiple sclerosis (MS) have evolved rapidly for relapsing–remitting MS, whereas few therapies are available for progressive forms of MS, in particular secondary progressive MS (SPMS). The approval of siponimod for SPMS has allowed for optimi...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9639325/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36336685 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s42466-022-00219-3 |
_version_ | 1784825613626900480 |
---|---|
author | Regner-Nelke, Liesa Pawlitzki, Marc Willison, Alice Rolfes, Leoni Oezalp, Sinem-Hilal Nelke, Christopher Kölsche, Tristan Korsen, Melanie Grothe, Matthias Groppa, Sergiu Luessi, Felix Engel, Sinah Nelles, Gereon Bonmann, Eckhard Roick, Holger Friedrich, Anke Knorn, Philipp Landefeld, Harald Biro, Zoltan Ernst, Michael Bayas, Antonios Menacher, Martina Akgün, Katja Kleinschnitz, Christoph Ruck, Tobias Ziemssen, Tjalf Pul, Refik Meuth, Sven G. |
author_facet | Regner-Nelke, Liesa Pawlitzki, Marc Willison, Alice Rolfes, Leoni Oezalp, Sinem-Hilal Nelke, Christopher Kölsche, Tristan Korsen, Melanie Grothe, Matthias Groppa, Sergiu Luessi, Felix Engel, Sinah Nelles, Gereon Bonmann, Eckhard Roick, Holger Friedrich, Anke Knorn, Philipp Landefeld, Harald Biro, Zoltan Ernst, Michael Bayas, Antonios Menacher, Martina Akgün, Katja Kleinschnitz, Christoph Ruck, Tobias Ziemssen, Tjalf Pul, Refik Meuth, Sven G. |
author_sort | Regner-Nelke, Liesa |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Therapeutic options targeting inflammation in multiple sclerosis (MS) have evolved rapidly for relapsing–remitting MS, whereas few therapies are available for progressive forms of MS, in particular secondary progressive MS (SPMS). The approval of siponimod for SPMS has allowed for optimism in the otherwise discouraging therapeutic landscape. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective, multicenter, non-interventional study analyzing the efficacy and safety of siponimod under real-world conditions in 227 SPMS patients. According to the retrospective study framework, data was acquired at prespecified time points. Clinical readouts were assessed every three months. Disease progression was determined as increase in expanded disability status scale (EDSS), radiological progression, or the occurrence of new relapses under treatment. For safety analyses, adverse events (AE) and reasons for discontinuation were documented. The collected data points were analyzed at baseline and after 6, 12 and 18 months. However, data were predominately collected at the 6- and 12-month time points as many patients were lost to follow-up. In a group consisting of 41 patients, a more detailed investigation regarding disease progression was conducted, including data from measurement of cognitive and motoric functions. RESULTS: Under siponimod therapy, 64.8% of patients experienced sustained clinical disease stability at 12 months. Out of the stable patients 21.4% of patients improved. Of the remaining patients, 31.5% experienced EDSS progression, 3.7% worsened without meeting the threshold for progression. Relapses occurred in 7.4%. Radiological disease activity was detected in 24.1% of patients after six months of treatment and in 29.6% of patients at 12 months follow-up. The in-depth cohort consisting of 41 patients demonstrated no substantial changes in cognitive abilities measured by Paced Auditory Serial Addition Test and Symbol Digit Modalities Test or motoric functions measured with Timed 25-Foot Walk, 100-m timed test, and 9-Hole Peg Test throughout the 12-month study period. Radiological assessment showed a stable volume of white and grey matter, as well as a stable lesion count at 12 months follow-up. AE were observed in nearly half of the included patients, with lymphopenia being the most common. Due to disease progression or AE, 31.2% of patients discontinued therapy. CONCLUSION: Treatment with siponimod had an overall stabilizing effect regarding clinical and radiological outcome measures. However, there is a need for more intensive treatment management and monitoring to identify disease progression and AE. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s42466-022-00219-3. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9639325 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-96393252022-11-08 Real-world evidence on siponimod treatment in patients with secondary progressive multiple sclerosis Regner-Nelke, Liesa Pawlitzki, Marc Willison, Alice Rolfes, Leoni Oezalp, Sinem-Hilal Nelke, Christopher Kölsche, Tristan Korsen, Melanie Grothe, Matthias Groppa, Sergiu Luessi, Felix Engel, Sinah Nelles, Gereon Bonmann, Eckhard Roick, Holger Friedrich, Anke Knorn, Philipp Landefeld, Harald Biro, Zoltan Ernst, Michael Bayas, Antonios Menacher, Martina Akgün, Katja Kleinschnitz, Christoph Ruck, Tobias Ziemssen, Tjalf Pul, Refik Meuth, Sven G. Neurol Res Pract Research Article BACKGROUND: Therapeutic options targeting inflammation in multiple sclerosis (MS) have evolved rapidly for relapsing–remitting MS, whereas few therapies are available for progressive forms of MS, in particular secondary progressive MS (SPMS). The approval of siponimod for SPMS has allowed for optimism in the otherwise discouraging therapeutic landscape. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective, multicenter, non-interventional study analyzing the efficacy and safety of siponimod under real-world conditions in 227 SPMS patients. According to the retrospective study framework, data was acquired at prespecified time points. Clinical readouts were assessed every three months. Disease progression was determined as increase in expanded disability status scale (EDSS), radiological progression, or the occurrence of new relapses under treatment. For safety analyses, adverse events (AE) and reasons for discontinuation were documented. The collected data points were analyzed at baseline and after 6, 12 and 18 months. However, data were predominately collected at the 6- and 12-month time points as many patients were lost to follow-up. In a group consisting of 41 patients, a more detailed investigation regarding disease progression was conducted, including data from measurement of cognitive and motoric functions. RESULTS: Under siponimod therapy, 64.8% of patients experienced sustained clinical disease stability at 12 months. Out of the stable patients 21.4% of patients improved. Of the remaining patients, 31.5% experienced EDSS progression, 3.7% worsened without meeting the threshold for progression. Relapses occurred in 7.4%. Radiological disease activity was detected in 24.1% of patients after six months of treatment and in 29.6% of patients at 12 months follow-up. The in-depth cohort consisting of 41 patients demonstrated no substantial changes in cognitive abilities measured by Paced Auditory Serial Addition Test and Symbol Digit Modalities Test or motoric functions measured with Timed 25-Foot Walk, 100-m timed test, and 9-Hole Peg Test throughout the 12-month study period. Radiological assessment showed a stable volume of white and grey matter, as well as a stable lesion count at 12 months follow-up. AE were observed in nearly half of the included patients, with lymphopenia being the most common. Due to disease progression or AE, 31.2% of patients discontinued therapy. CONCLUSION: Treatment with siponimod had an overall stabilizing effect regarding clinical and radiological outcome measures. However, there is a need for more intensive treatment management and monitoring to identify disease progression and AE. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s42466-022-00219-3. BioMed Central 2022-11-07 /pmc/articles/PMC9639325/ /pubmed/36336685 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s42466-022-00219-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Research Article Regner-Nelke, Liesa Pawlitzki, Marc Willison, Alice Rolfes, Leoni Oezalp, Sinem-Hilal Nelke, Christopher Kölsche, Tristan Korsen, Melanie Grothe, Matthias Groppa, Sergiu Luessi, Felix Engel, Sinah Nelles, Gereon Bonmann, Eckhard Roick, Holger Friedrich, Anke Knorn, Philipp Landefeld, Harald Biro, Zoltan Ernst, Michael Bayas, Antonios Menacher, Martina Akgün, Katja Kleinschnitz, Christoph Ruck, Tobias Ziemssen, Tjalf Pul, Refik Meuth, Sven G. Real-world evidence on siponimod treatment in patients with secondary progressive multiple sclerosis |
title | Real-world evidence on siponimod treatment in patients with secondary progressive multiple sclerosis |
title_full | Real-world evidence on siponimod treatment in patients with secondary progressive multiple sclerosis |
title_fullStr | Real-world evidence on siponimod treatment in patients with secondary progressive multiple sclerosis |
title_full_unstemmed | Real-world evidence on siponimod treatment in patients with secondary progressive multiple sclerosis |
title_short | Real-world evidence on siponimod treatment in patients with secondary progressive multiple sclerosis |
title_sort | real-world evidence on siponimod treatment in patients with secondary progressive multiple sclerosis |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9639325/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36336685 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s42466-022-00219-3 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT regnernelkeliesa realworldevidenceonsiponimodtreatmentinpatientswithsecondaryprogressivemultiplesclerosis AT pawlitzkimarc realworldevidenceonsiponimodtreatmentinpatientswithsecondaryprogressivemultiplesclerosis AT willisonalice realworldevidenceonsiponimodtreatmentinpatientswithsecondaryprogressivemultiplesclerosis AT rolfesleoni realworldevidenceonsiponimodtreatmentinpatientswithsecondaryprogressivemultiplesclerosis AT oezalpsinemhilal realworldevidenceonsiponimodtreatmentinpatientswithsecondaryprogressivemultiplesclerosis AT nelkechristopher realworldevidenceonsiponimodtreatmentinpatientswithsecondaryprogressivemultiplesclerosis AT kolschetristan realworldevidenceonsiponimodtreatmentinpatientswithsecondaryprogressivemultiplesclerosis AT korsenmelanie realworldevidenceonsiponimodtreatmentinpatientswithsecondaryprogressivemultiplesclerosis AT grothematthias realworldevidenceonsiponimodtreatmentinpatientswithsecondaryprogressivemultiplesclerosis AT groppasergiu realworldevidenceonsiponimodtreatmentinpatientswithsecondaryprogressivemultiplesclerosis AT luessifelix realworldevidenceonsiponimodtreatmentinpatientswithsecondaryprogressivemultiplesclerosis AT engelsinah realworldevidenceonsiponimodtreatmentinpatientswithsecondaryprogressivemultiplesclerosis AT nellesgereon realworldevidenceonsiponimodtreatmentinpatientswithsecondaryprogressivemultiplesclerosis AT bonmanneckhard realworldevidenceonsiponimodtreatmentinpatientswithsecondaryprogressivemultiplesclerosis AT roickholger realworldevidenceonsiponimodtreatmentinpatientswithsecondaryprogressivemultiplesclerosis AT friedrichanke realworldevidenceonsiponimodtreatmentinpatientswithsecondaryprogressivemultiplesclerosis AT knornphilipp realworldevidenceonsiponimodtreatmentinpatientswithsecondaryprogressivemultiplesclerosis AT landefeldharald realworldevidenceonsiponimodtreatmentinpatientswithsecondaryprogressivemultiplesclerosis AT birozoltan realworldevidenceonsiponimodtreatmentinpatientswithsecondaryprogressivemultiplesclerosis AT ernstmichael realworldevidenceonsiponimodtreatmentinpatientswithsecondaryprogressivemultiplesclerosis AT bayasantonios realworldevidenceonsiponimodtreatmentinpatientswithsecondaryprogressivemultiplesclerosis AT menachermartina realworldevidenceonsiponimodtreatmentinpatientswithsecondaryprogressivemultiplesclerosis AT akgunkatja realworldevidenceonsiponimodtreatmentinpatientswithsecondaryprogressivemultiplesclerosis AT kleinschnitzchristoph realworldevidenceonsiponimodtreatmentinpatientswithsecondaryprogressivemultiplesclerosis AT rucktobias realworldevidenceonsiponimodtreatmentinpatientswithsecondaryprogressivemultiplesclerosis AT ziemssentjalf realworldevidenceonsiponimodtreatmentinpatientswithsecondaryprogressivemultiplesclerosis AT pulrefik realworldevidenceonsiponimodtreatmentinpatientswithsecondaryprogressivemultiplesclerosis AT meuthsveng realworldevidenceonsiponimodtreatmentinpatientswithsecondaryprogressivemultiplesclerosis |