Cargando…

Place of distancing measures in containing epidemics: a scoping review

Distancing is one of the barrier measures in mitigating epidemics. We aimed to investigate the typology, effectiveness, and side effects of distancing rules during epidemics. Electronic searches were conducted on MEDLINE, PubMed in April 2020, using Mesh-Terms representing various forms of distancin...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chebil, Dhekra, Ben Hassine, Donia, Melki, Sarra, Nouira, Sarra, Kammoun Rebai, Wafa, Hannachi, Hajer, Merzougui, Latifa, Ben Abdelaziz, Ahmed
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Taylor & Francis 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9639554/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36325628
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/19932820.2022.2140473
_version_ 1784825666044166144
author Chebil, Dhekra
Ben Hassine, Donia
Melki, Sarra
Nouira, Sarra
Kammoun Rebai, Wafa
Hannachi, Hajer
Merzougui, Latifa
Ben Abdelaziz, Ahmed
author_facet Chebil, Dhekra
Ben Hassine, Donia
Melki, Sarra
Nouira, Sarra
Kammoun Rebai, Wafa
Hannachi, Hajer
Merzougui, Latifa
Ben Abdelaziz, Ahmed
author_sort Chebil, Dhekra
collection PubMed
description Distancing is one of the barrier measures in mitigating epidemics. We aimed to investigate the typology, effectiveness, and side effects of distancing rules during epidemics. Electronic searches were conducted on MEDLINE, PubMed in April 2020, using Mesh-Terms representing various forms of distancing (‘social isolation’, ‘social distancing’, ‘quarantine’) combining with ‘epidemics’. PRISMA-ScR statement was consulted to report this review. A total of 314 titles were identified and 93 were finally included. 2009 influenza A and SARS-CoV-2 epidemics were the most studied. Distancing measures were mostly classified as case-based and community-based interventions. The combination of distancing rules, like school closure, home working, isolation and quarantine, has proven to be effective in reducing R(0) and flattening the epidemic curve, also when initiated early at a high rate and combined with other non-pharmaceutical interventions. Epidemiological and modeling studies showed that Isolation and quarantine in the 2009 Influenza pandemic were effective measures to decrease attack rate also with high level of compliance but there was an increased risk of household transmission. lockdown was also effective to reduce R(0) from 2.6 to 0.6 and to increase doubling time from 2 to 4 days in the covid-19 pandemic. The evidence for school closure and workplace distancing was moderate as single intervention. Psychological disorder, unhealthy behaviors, disruption of economic activities, social discrimination, and stigmatization were the main side effects of distancing measures. Earlier implementation of combined distancing measures leads to greater effectiveness in containing outbreaks. Their indication must be relevant and based on evidence to avoid adverse effects on the community. These results would help decision-makers to develop response plans based on the required experience and strengthen the capacity of countries to fight against future epidemics. Mesh words: Physical Distancing, Quarantine, Epidemics, Public Health, Scoping Review.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9639554
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Taylor & Francis
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-96395542022-11-08 Place of distancing measures in containing epidemics: a scoping review Chebil, Dhekra Ben Hassine, Donia Melki, Sarra Nouira, Sarra Kammoun Rebai, Wafa Hannachi, Hajer Merzougui, Latifa Ben Abdelaziz, Ahmed Libyan J Med Review Article Distancing is one of the barrier measures in mitigating epidemics. We aimed to investigate the typology, effectiveness, and side effects of distancing rules during epidemics. Electronic searches were conducted on MEDLINE, PubMed in April 2020, using Mesh-Terms representing various forms of distancing (‘social isolation’, ‘social distancing’, ‘quarantine’) combining with ‘epidemics’. PRISMA-ScR statement was consulted to report this review. A total of 314 titles were identified and 93 were finally included. 2009 influenza A and SARS-CoV-2 epidemics were the most studied. Distancing measures were mostly classified as case-based and community-based interventions. The combination of distancing rules, like school closure, home working, isolation and quarantine, has proven to be effective in reducing R(0) and flattening the epidemic curve, also when initiated early at a high rate and combined with other non-pharmaceutical interventions. Epidemiological and modeling studies showed that Isolation and quarantine in the 2009 Influenza pandemic were effective measures to decrease attack rate also with high level of compliance but there was an increased risk of household transmission. lockdown was also effective to reduce R(0) from 2.6 to 0.6 and to increase doubling time from 2 to 4 days in the covid-19 pandemic. The evidence for school closure and workplace distancing was moderate as single intervention. Psychological disorder, unhealthy behaviors, disruption of economic activities, social discrimination, and stigmatization were the main side effects of distancing measures. Earlier implementation of combined distancing measures leads to greater effectiveness in containing outbreaks. Their indication must be relevant and based on evidence to avoid adverse effects on the community. These results would help decision-makers to develop response plans based on the required experience and strengthen the capacity of countries to fight against future epidemics. Mesh words: Physical Distancing, Quarantine, Epidemics, Public Health, Scoping Review. Taylor & Francis 2022-11-02 /pmc/articles/PMC9639554/ /pubmed/36325628 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/19932820.2022.2140473 Text en © 2022 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) ), which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Review Article
Chebil, Dhekra
Ben Hassine, Donia
Melki, Sarra
Nouira, Sarra
Kammoun Rebai, Wafa
Hannachi, Hajer
Merzougui, Latifa
Ben Abdelaziz, Ahmed
Place of distancing measures in containing epidemics: a scoping review
title Place of distancing measures in containing epidemics: a scoping review
title_full Place of distancing measures in containing epidemics: a scoping review
title_fullStr Place of distancing measures in containing epidemics: a scoping review
title_full_unstemmed Place of distancing measures in containing epidemics: a scoping review
title_short Place of distancing measures in containing epidemics: a scoping review
title_sort place of distancing measures in containing epidemics: a scoping review
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9639554/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36325628
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/19932820.2022.2140473
work_keys_str_mv AT chebildhekra placeofdistancingmeasuresincontainingepidemicsascopingreview
AT benhassinedonia placeofdistancingmeasuresincontainingepidemicsascopingreview
AT melkisarra placeofdistancingmeasuresincontainingepidemicsascopingreview
AT nouirasarra placeofdistancingmeasuresincontainingepidemicsascopingreview
AT kammounrebaiwafa placeofdistancingmeasuresincontainingepidemicsascopingreview
AT hannachihajer placeofdistancingmeasuresincontainingepidemicsascopingreview
AT merzouguilatifa placeofdistancingmeasuresincontainingepidemicsascopingreview
AT benabdelazizahmed placeofdistancingmeasuresincontainingepidemicsascopingreview