Cargando…
Place of distancing measures in containing epidemics: a scoping review
Distancing is one of the barrier measures in mitigating epidemics. We aimed to investigate the typology, effectiveness, and side effects of distancing rules during epidemics. Electronic searches were conducted on MEDLINE, PubMed in April 2020, using Mesh-Terms representing various forms of distancin...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Taylor & Francis
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9639554/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36325628 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/19932820.2022.2140473 |
_version_ | 1784825666044166144 |
---|---|
author | Chebil, Dhekra Ben Hassine, Donia Melki, Sarra Nouira, Sarra Kammoun Rebai, Wafa Hannachi, Hajer Merzougui, Latifa Ben Abdelaziz, Ahmed |
author_facet | Chebil, Dhekra Ben Hassine, Donia Melki, Sarra Nouira, Sarra Kammoun Rebai, Wafa Hannachi, Hajer Merzougui, Latifa Ben Abdelaziz, Ahmed |
author_sort | Chebil, Dhekra |
collection | PubMed |
description | Distancing is one of the barrier measures in mitigating epidemics. We aimed to investigate the typology, effectiveness, and side effects of distancing rules during epidemics. Electronic searches were conducted on MEDLINE, PubMed in April 2020, using Mesh-Terms representing various forms of distancing (‘social isolation’, ‘social distancing’, ‘quarantine’) combining with ‘epidemics’. PRISMA-ScR statement was consulted to report this review. A total of 314 titles were identified and 93 were finally included. 2009 influenza A and SARS-CoV-2 epidemics were the most studied. Distancing measures were mostly classified as case-based and community-based interventions. The combination of distancing rules, like school closure, home working, isolation and quarantine, has proven to be effective in reducing R(0) and flattening the epidemic curve, also when initiated early at a high rate and combined with other non-pharmaceutical interventions. Epidemiological and modeling studies showed that Isolation and quarantine in the 2009 Influenza pandemic were effective measures to decrease attack rate also with high level of compliance but there was an increased risk of household transmission. lockdown was also effective to reduce R(0) from 2.6 to 0.6 and to increase doubling time from 2 to 4 days in the covid-19 pandemic. The evidence for school closure and workplace distancing was moderate as single intervention. Psychological disorder, unhealthy behaviors, disruption of economic activities, social discrimination, and stigmatization were the main side effects of distancing measures. Earlier implementation of combined distancing measures leads to greater effectiveness in containing outbreaks. Their indication must be relevant and based on evidence to avoid adverse effects on the community. These results would help decision-makers to develop response plans based on the required experience and strengthen the capacity of countries to fight against future epidemics. Mesh words: Physical Distancing, Quarantine, Epidemics, Public Health, Scoping Review. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9639554 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Taylor & Francis |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-96395542022-11-08 Place of distancing measures in containing epidemics: a scoping review Chebil, Dhekra Ben Hassine, Donia Melki, Sarra Nouira, Sarra Kammoun Rebai, Wafa Hannachi, Hajer Merzougui, Latifa Ben Abdelaziz, Ahmed Libyan J Med Review Article Distancing is one of the barrier measures in mitigating epidemics. We aimed to investigate the typology, effectiveness, and side effects of distancing rules during epidemics. Electronic searches were conducted on MEDLINE, PubMed in April 2020, using Mesh-Terms representing various forms of distancing (‘social isolation’, ‘social distancing’, ‘quarantine’) combining with ‘epidemics’. PRISMA-ScR statement was consulted to report this review. A total of 314 titles were identified and 93 were finally included. 2009 influenza A and SARS-CoV-2 epidemics were the most studied. Distancing measures were mostly classified as case-based and community-based interventions. The combination of distancing rules, like school closure, home working, isolation and quarantine, has proven to be effective in reducing R(0) and flattening the epidemic curve, also when initiated early at a high rate and combined with other non-pharmaceutical interventions. Epidemiological and modeling studies showed that Isolation and quarantine in the 2009 Influenza pandemic were effective measures to decrease attack rate also with high level of compliance but there was an increased risk of household transmission. lockdown was also effective to reduce R(0) from 2.6 to 0.6 and to increase doubling time from 2 to 4 days in the covid-19 pandemic. The evidence for school closure and workplace distancing was moderate as single intervention. Psychological disorder, unhealthy behaviors, disruption of economic activities, social discrimination, and stigmatization were the main side effects of distancing measures. Earlier implementation of combined distancing measures leads to greater effectiveness in containing outbreaks. Their indication must be relevant and based on evidence to avoid adverse effects on the community. These results would help decision-makers to develop response plans based on the required experience and strengthen the capacity of countries to fight against future epidemics. Mesh words: Physical Distancing, Quarantine, Epidemics, Public Health, Scoping Review. Taylor & Francis 2022-11-02 /pmc/articles/PMC9639554/ /pubmed/36325628 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/19932820.2022.2140473 Text en © 2022 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) ), which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Review Article Chebil, Dhekra Ben Hassine, Donia Melki, Sarra Nouira, Sarra Kammoun Rebai, Wafa Hannachi, Hajer Merzougui, Latifa Ben Abdelaziz, Ahmed Place of distancing measures in containing epidemics: a scoping review |
title | Place of distancing measures in containing epidemics: a scoping review |
title_full | Place of distancing measures in containing epidemics: a scoping review |
title_fullStr | Place of distancing measures in containing epidemics: a scoping review |
title_full_unstemmed | Place of distancing measures in containing epidemics: a scoping review |
title_short | Place of distancing measures in containing epidemics: a scoping review |
title_sort | place of distancing measures in containing epidemics: a scoping review |
topic | Review Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9639554/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36325628 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/19932820.2022.2140473 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT chebildhekra placeofdistancingmeasuresincontainingepidemicsascopingreview AT benhassinedonia placeofdistancingmeasuresincontainingepidemicsascopingreview AT melkisarra placeofdistancingmeasuresincontainingepidemicsascopingreview AT nouirasarra placeofdistancingmeasuresincontainingepidemicsascopingreview AT kammounrebaiwafa placeofdistancingmeasuresincontainingepidemicsascopingreview AT hannachihajer placeofdistancingmeasuresincontainingepidemicsascopingreview AT merzouguilatifa placeofdistancingmeasuresincontainingepidemicsascopingreview AT benabdelazizahmed placeofdistancingmeasuresincontainingepidemicsascopingreview |