Cargando…

Unintended consequences of patient online access to health records: a qualitative study in UK primary care

BACKGROUND: Health systems are seeking to harness digital tools to promote patient autonomy and increase the efficiency of care worldwide. The NHS Long Term Plan created the right for patients to access ‘digital first’ primary care by 2023–2024, including online patient access to full medical record...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Turner, Andrew, Morris, Rebecca, McDonagh, Lorraine, Hamilton, Fiona, Blake, Sarah, Farr, Michelle, Stevenson, Fiona, Banks, Jon, Atherton, Helen, Rakhra, Dylan, Lasseter, Gemma, Feder, Gene, Ziebland, Sue, Hyde, Emma, Powell, John, Horwood, Jeremy
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Royal College of General Practitioners 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9639599/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36316163
http://dx.doi.org/10.3399/BJGP.2021.0720
_version_ 1784825676258344960
author Turner, Andrew
Morris, Rebecca
McDonagh, Lorraine
Hamilton, Fiona
Blake, Sarah
Farr, Michelle
Stevenson, Fiona
Banks, Jon
Atherton, Helen
Rakhra, Dylan
Lasseter, Gemma
Feder, Gene
Ziebland, Sue
Hyde, Emma
Powell, John
Horwood, Jeremy
author_facet Turner, Andrew
Morris, Rebecca
McDonagh, Lorraine
Hamilton, Fiona
Blake, Sarah
Farr, Michelle
Stevenson, Fiona
Banks, Jon
Atherton, Helen
Rakhra, Dylan
Lasseter, Gemma
Feder, Gene
Ziebland, Sue
Hyde, Emma
Powell, John
Horwood, Jeremy
author_sort Turner, Andrew
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Health systems are seeking to harness digital tools to promote patient autonomy and increase the efficiency of care worldwide. The NHS Long Term Plan created the right for patients to access ‘digital first’ primary care by 2023–2024, including online patient access to full medical records. AIM: To identify and understand the unintended consequences of online patient access to medical records. DESIGN AND SETTING: Qualitative interview study in 10 general practices in South West and North West England. METHOD: Semi-structured individual interviews with 13 patients and 16 general practice staff with experience of patient online access to health records. RESULTS: Online access generated unintended consequences that negatively impacted patients’ understanding of their health care, with patients finding surprising or difficult to interpret information. Online access impacted GPs’ documentation practices, such as when GPs pre-emptively attempted to minimise potential misunderstandings to aid patient understanding of their health care. In other cases, this negatively impacted the quality of the records and patient safety when GPs avoided documenting speculations or concerns. Contrary to assumptions that workload would be reduced, online access introduced extra work, such as managing and monitoring access, and taking measures to prevent possible harm to patients. CONCLUSION: The unintended consequences described by both staff and patients show that, to achieve the intended consequences set out in NHS policy, additional work is necessary to prepare records for sharing and to prepare patients about what to expect. It is crucial that practices are adequately supported and resourced to manage the unintended consequences of online access, now that it is the default position. A table of potential unintended consequences and mitigation measures is provided to aid practice managers and clinicians implementing online access.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9639599
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Royal College of General Practitioners
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-96395992022-11-14 Unintended consequences of patient online access to health records: a qualitative study in UK primary care Turner, Andrew Morris, Rebecca McDonagh, Lorraine Hamilton, Fiona Blake, Sarah Farr, Michelle Stevenson, Fiona Banks, Jon Atherton, Helen Rakhra, Dylan Lasseter, Gemma Feder, Gene Ziebland, Sue Hyde, Emma Powell, John Horwood, Jeremy Br J Gen Pract Research BACKGROUND: Health systems are seeking to harness digital tools to promote patient autonomy and increase the efficiency of care worldwide. The NHS Long Term Plan created the right for patients to access ‘digital first’ primary care by 2023–2024, including online patient access to full medical records. AIM: To identify and understand the unintended consequences of online patient access to medical records. DESIGN AND SETTING: Qualitative interview study in 10 general practices in South West and North West England. METHOD: Semi-structured individual interviews with 13 patients and 16 general practice staff with experience of patient online access to health records. RESULTS: Online access generated unintended consequences that negatively impacted patients’ understanding of their health care, with patients finding surprising or difficult to interpret information. Online access impacted GPs’ documentation practices, such as when GPs pre-emptively attempted to minimise potential misunderstandings to aid patient understanding of their health care. In other cases, this negatively impacted the quality of the records and patient safety when GPs avoided documenting speculations or concerns. Contrary to assumptions that workload would be reduced, online access introduced extra work, such as managing and monitoring access, and taking measures to prevent possible harm to patients. CONCLUSION: The unintended consequences described by both staff and patients show that, to achieve the intended consequences set out in NHS policy, additional work is necessary to prepare records for sharing and to prepare patients about what to expect. It is crucial that practices are adequately supported and resourced to manage the unintended consequences of online access, now that it is the default position. A table of potential unintended consequences and mitigation measures is provided to aid practice managers and clinicians implementing online access. Royal College of General Practitioners 2022-11-01 /pmc/articles/PMC9639599/ /pubmed/36316163 http://dx.doi.org/10.3399/BJGP.2021.0720 Text en © The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article is Open Access: CC BY 4.0 licence (http://creativecommons.org/licences/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) ).
spellingShingle Research
Turner, Andrew
Morris, Rebecca
McDonagh, Lorraine
Hamilton, Fiona
Blake, Sarah
Farr, Michelle
Stevenson, Fiona
Banks, Jon
Atherton, Helen
Rakhra, Dylan
Lasseter, Gemma
Feder, Gene
Ziebland, Sue
Hyde, Emma
Powell, John
Horwood, Jeremy
Unintended consequences of patient online access to health records: a qualitative study in UK primary care
title Unintended consequences of patient online access to health records: a qualitative study in UK primary care
title_full Unintended consequences of patient online access to health records: a qualitative study in UK primary care
title_fullStr Unintended consequences of patient online access to health records: a qualitative study in UK primary care
title_full_unstemmed Unintended consequences of patient online access to health records: a qualitative study in UK primary care
title_short Unintended consequences of patient online access to health records: a qualitative study in UK primary care
title_sort unintended consequences of patient online access to health records: a qualitative study in uk primary care
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9639599/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36316163
http://dx.doi.org/10.3399/BJGP.2021.0720
work_keys_str_mv AT turnerandrew unintendedconsequencesofpatientonlineaccesstohealthrecordsaqualitativestudyinukprimarycare
AT morrisrebecca unintendedconsequencesofpatientonlineaccesstohealthrecordsaqualitativestudyinukprimarycare
AT mcdonaghlorraine unintendedconsequencesofpatientonlineaccesstohealthrecordsaqualitativestudyinukprimarycare
AT hamiltonfiona unintendedconsequencesofpatientonlineaccesstohealthrecordsaqualitativestudyinukprimarycare
AT blakesarah unintendedconsequencesofpatientonlineaccesstohealthrecordsaqualitativestudyinukprimarycare
AT farrmichelle unintendedconsequencesofpatientonlineaccesstohealthrecordsaqualitativestudyinukprimarycare
AT stevensonfiona unintendedconsequencesofpatientonlineaccesstohealthrecordsaqualitativestudyinukprimarycare
AT banksjon unintendedconsequencesofpatientonlineaccesstohealthrecordsaqualitativestudyinukprimarycare
AT athertonhelen unintendedconsequencesofpatientonlineaccesstohealthrecordsaqualitativestudyinukprimarycare
AT rakhradylan unintendedconsequencesofpatientonlineaccesstohealthrecordsaqualitativestudyinukprimarycare
AT lassetergemma unintendedconsequencesofpatientonlineaccesstohealthrecordsaqualitativestudyinukprimarycare
AT federgene unintendedconsequencesofpatientonlineaccesstohealthrecordsaqualitativestudyinukprimarycare
AT zieblandsue unintendedconsequencesofpatientonlineaccesstohealthrecordsaqualitativestudyinukprimarycare
AT hydeemma unintendedconsequencesofpatientonlineaccesstohealthrecordsaqualitativestudyinukprimarycare
AT powelljohn unintendedconsequencesofpatientonlineaccesstohealthrecordsaqualitativestudyinukprimarycare
AT horwoodjeremy unintendedconsequencesofpatientonlineaccesstohealthrecordsaqualitativestudyinukprimarycare