_version_ 1784825682728058880
author Woollacott, Ione O. C.
Swift, Imogen J.
Sogorb‐Esteve, Aitana
Heller, Carolin
Knowles, Kathryn
Bouzigues, Arabella
Russell, Lucy L.
Peakman, Georgia
Greaves, Caroline V.
Convery, Rhian
Heslegrave, Amanda
Rowe, James B.
Borroni, Barbara
Galimberti, Daniela
Tiraboschi, Pietro
Masellis, Mario
Tartaglia, Maria Carmela
Finger, Elizabeth
van Swieten, John C.
Seelaar, Harro
Jiskoot, Lize
Sorbi, Sandro
Butler, Chris R.
Graff, Caroline
Gerhard, Alexander
Laforce, Robert
Sanchez‐Valle, Raquel
de Mendonça, Alexandre
Moreno, Fermin
Synofzik, Matthis
Vandenberghe, Rik
Ducharme, Simon
Ber, Isabelle Le
Levin, Johannes
Otto, Markus
Pasquier, Florence
Santana, Isabel
Zetterberg, Henrik
Rohrer, Jonathan D.
author_facet Woollacott, Ione O. C.
Swift, Imogen J.
Sogorb‐Esteve, Aitana
Heller, Carolin
Knowles, Kathryn
Bouzigues, Arabella
Russell, Lucy L.
Peakman, Georgia
Greaves, Caroline V.
Convery, Rhian
Heslegrave, Amanda
Rowe, James B.
Borroni, Barbara
Galimberti, Daniela
Tiraboschi, Pietro
Masellis, Mario
Tartaglia, Maria Carmela
Finger, Elizabeth
van Swieten, John C.
Seelaar, Harro
Jiskoot, Lize
Sorbi, Sandro
Butler, Chris R.
Graff, Caroline
Gerhard, Alexander
Laforce, Robert
Sanchez‐Valle, Raquel
de Mendonça, Alexandre
Moreno, Fermin
Synofzik, Matthis
Vandenberghe, Rik
Ducharme, Simon
Ber, Isabelle Le
Levin, Johannes
Otto, Markus
Pasquier, Florence
Santana, Isabel
Zetterberg, Henrik
Rohrer, Jonathan D.
author_sort Woollacott, Ione O. C.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Neuroinflammation has been shown to be an important pathophysiological disease mechanism in frontotemporal dementia (FTD). This includes activation of microglia, a process that can be measured in life through assaying different glia‐derived biomarkers in cerebrospinal fluid. However, only a few studies so far have taken place in FTD, and even fewer focusing on the genetic forms of FTD. METHODS: We investigated the cerebrospinal fluid concentrations of TREM2, YKL‐40 and chitotriosidase using immunoassays in 183 participants from the Genetic FTD Initiative (GENFI) study: 49 C9orf72 (36 presymptomatic, 13 symptomatic), 49 GRN (37 presymptomatic, 12 symptomatic) and 23 MAPT (16 presymptomatic, 7 symptomatic) mutation carriers and 62 mutation‐negative controls. Concentrations were compared between groups using a linear regression model adjusting for age and sex, with 95% bias‐corrected bootstrapped confidence intervals. Concentrations in each group were correlated with the Mini‐Mental State Examination (MMSE) score using non‐parametric partial correlations adjusting for age. Age‐adjusted z‐scores were also created for the concentration of markers in each participant, investigating how many had a value above the 95th percentile of controls. RESULTS: Only chitotriosidase in symptomatic GRN mutation carriers had a concentration significantly higher than controls. No group had higher TREM2 or YKL‐40 concentrations than controls after adjusting for age and sex. There was a significant negative correlation of chitotriosidase concentration with MMSE in presymptomatic GRN mutation carriers. In the symptomatic groups, for TREM2 31% of C9orf72, 25% of GRN, and 14% of MAPT mutation carriers had a concentration above the 95(th) percentile of controls. For YKL‐40 this was 8% C9orf72, 8% GRN and 0% MAPT mutation carriers, whilst for chitotriosidase it was 23% C9orf72, 50% GRN, and 29% MAPT mutation carriers. CONCLUSIONS: Although chitotriosidase concentrations in GRN mutation carriers were the only significantly raised glia‐derived biomarker as a group, a subset of mutation carriers in all three groups, particularly for chitotriosidase and TREM2, had elevated concentrations. Further work is required to understand the variability in concentrations and the extent of neuroinflammation across the genetic forms of FTD. However, the current findings suggest limited utility of these measures in forthcoming trials.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9639635
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-96396352022-11-14 CSF glial markers are elevated in a subset of patients with genetic frontotemporal dementia Woollacott, Ione O. C. Swift, Imogen J. Sogorb‐Esteve, Aitana Heller, Carolin Knowles, Kathryn Bouzigues, Arabella Russell, Lucy L. Peakman, Georgia Greaves, Caroline V. Convery, Rhian Heslegrave, Amanda Rowe, James B. Borroni, Barbara Galimberti, Daniela Tiraboschi, Pietro Masellis, Mario Tartaglia, Maria Carmela Finger, Elizabeth van Swieten, John C. Seelaar, Harro Jiskoot, Lize Sorbi, Sandro Butler, Chris R. Graff, Caroline Gerhard, Alexander Laforce, Robert Sanchez‐Valle, Raquel de Mendonça, Alexandre Moreno, Fermin Synofzik, Matthis Vandenberghe, Rik Ducharme, Simon Ber, Isabelle Le Levin, Johannes Otto, Markus Pasquier, Florence Santana, Isabel Zetterberg, Henrik Rohrer, Jonathan D. Ann Clin Transl Neurol Research Articles BACKGROUND: Neuroinflammation has been shown to be an important pathophysiological disease mechanism in frontotemporal dementia (FTD). This includes activation of microglia, a process that can be measured in life through assaying different glia‐derived biomarkers in cerebrospinal fluid. However, only a few studies so far have taken place in FTD, and even fewer focusing on the genetic forms of FTD. METHODS: We investigated the cerebrospinal fluid concentrations of TREM2, YKL‐40 and chitotriosidase using immunoassays in 183 participants from the Genetic FTD Initiative (GENFI) study: 49 C9orf72 (36 presymptomatic, 13 symptomatic), 49 GRN (37 presymptomatic, 12 symptomatic) and 23 MAPT (16 presymptomatic, 7 symptomatic) mutation carriers and 62 mutation‐negative controls. Concentrations were compared between groups using a linear regression model adjusting for age and sex, with 95% bias‐corrected bootstrapped confidence intervals. Concentrations in each group were correlated with the Mini‐Mental State Examination (MMSE) score using non‐parametric partial correlations adjusting for age. Age‐adjusted z‐scores were also created for the concentration of markers in each participant, investigating how many had a value above the 95th percentile of controls. RESULTS: Only chitotriosidase in symptomatic GRN mutation carriers had a concentration significantly higher than controls. No group had higher TREM2 or YKL‐40 concentrations than controls after adjusting for age and sex. There was a significant negative correlation of chitotriosidase concentration with MMSE in presymptomatic GRN mutation carriers. In the symptomatic groups, for TREM2 31% of C9orf72, 25% of GRN, and 14% of MAPT mutation carriers had a concentration above the 95(th) percentile of controls. For YKL‐40 this was 8% C9orf72, 8% GRN and 0% MAPT mutation carriers, whilst for chitotriosidase it was 23% C9orf72, 50% GRN, and 29% MAPT mutation carriers. CONCLUSIONS: Although chitotriosidase concentrations in GRN mutation carriers were the only significantly raised glia‐derived biomarker as a group, a subset of mutation carriers in all three groups, particularly for chitotriosidase and TREM2, had elevated concentrations. Further work is required to understand the variability in concentrations and the extent of neuroinflammation across the genetic forms of FTD. However, the current findings suggest limited utility of these measures in forthcoming trials. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-10-17 /pmc/articles/PMC9639635/ /pubmed/36245297 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acn3.51672 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Neurological Association. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Articles
Woollacott, Ione O. C.
Swift, Imogen J.
Sogorb‐Esteve, Aitana
Heller, Carolin
Knowles, Kathryn
Bouzigues, Arabella
Russell, Lucy L.
Peakman, Georgia
Greaves, Caroline V.
Convery, Rhian
Heslegrave, Amanda
Rowe, James B.
Borroni, Barbara
Galimberti, Daniela
Tiraboschi, Pietro
Masellis, Mario
Tartaglia, Maria Carmela
Finger, Elizabeth
van Swieten, John C.
Seelaar, Harro
Jiskoot, Lize
Sorbi, Sandro
Butler, Chris R.
Graff, Caroline
Gerhard, Alexander
Laforce, Robert
Sanchez‐Valle, Raquel
de Mendonça, Alexandre
Moreno, Fermin
Synofzik, Matthis
Vandenberghe, Rik
Ducharme, Simon
Ber, Isabelle Le
Levin, Johannes
Otto, Markus
Pasquier, Florence
Santana, Isabel
Zetterberg, Henrik
Rohrer, Jonathan D.
CSF glial markers are elevated in a subset of patients with genetic frontotemporal dementia
title CSF glial markers are elevated in a subset of patients with genetic frontotemporal dementia
title_full CSF glial markers are elevated in a subset of patients with genetic frontotemporal dementia
title_fullStr CSF glial markers are elevated in a subset of patients with genetic frontotemporal dementia
title_full_unstemmed CSF glial markers are elevated in a subset of patients with genetic frontotemporal dementia
title_short CSF glial markers are elevated in a subset of patients with genetic frontotemporal dementia
title_sort csf glial markers are elevated in a subset of patients with genetic frontotemporal dementia
topic Research Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9639635/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36245297
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acn3.51672
work_keys_str_mv AT woollacottioneoc csfglialmarkersareelevatedinasubsetofpatientswithgeneticfrontotemporaldementia
AT swiftimogenj csfglialmarkersareelevatedinasubsetofpatientswithgeneticfrontotemporaldementia
AT sogorbesteveaitana csfglialmarkersareelevatedinasubsetofpatientswithgeneticfrontotemporaldementia
AT hellercarolin csfglialmarkersareelevatedinasubsetofpatientswithgeneticfrontotemporaldementia
AT knowleskathryn csfglialmarkersareelevatedinasubsetofpatientswithgeneticfrontotemporaldementia
AT bouziguesarabella csfglialmarkersareelevatedinasubsetofpatientswithgeneticfrontotemporaldementia
AT russelllucyl csfglialmarkersareelevatedinasubsetofpatientswithgeneticfrontotemporaldementia
AT peakmangeorgia csfglialmarkersareelevatedinasubsetofpatientswithgeneticfrontotemporaldementia
AT greavescarolinev csfglialmarkersareelevatedinasubsetofpatientswithgeneticfrontotemporaldementia
AT converyrhian csfglialmarkersareelevatedinasubsetofpatientswithgeneticfrontotemporaldementia
AT heslegraveamanda csfglialmarkersareelevatedinasubsetofpatientswithgeneticfrontotemporaldementia
AT rowejamesb csfglialmarkersareelevatedinasubsetofpatientswithgeneticfrontotemporaldementia
AT borronibarbara csfglialmarkersareelevatedinasubsetofpatientswithgeneticfrontotemporaldementia
AT galimbertidaniela csfglialmarkersareelevatedinasubsetofpatientswithgeneticfrontotemporaldementia
AT tiraboschipietro csfglialmarkersareelevatedinasubsetofpatientswithgeneticfrontotemporaldementia
AT masellismario csfglialmarkersareelevatedinasubsetofpatientswithgeneticfrontotemporaldementia
AT tartagliamariacarmela csfglialmarkersareelevatedinasubsetofpatientswithgeneticfrontotemporaldementia
AT fingerelizabeth csfglialmarkersareelevatedinasubsetofpatientswithgeneticfrontotemporaldementia
AT vanswietenjohnc csfglialmarkersareelevatedinasubsetofpatientswithgeneticfrontotemporaldementia
AT seelaarharro csfglialmarkersareelevatedinasubsetofpatientswithgeneticfrontotemporaldementia
AT jiskootlize csfglialmarkersareelevatedinasubsetofpatientswithgeneticfrontotemporaldementia
AT sorbisandro csfglialmarkersareelevatedinasubsetofpatientswithgeneticfrontotemporaldementia
AT butlerchrisr csfglialmarkersareelevatedinasubsetofpatientswithgeneticfrontotemporaldementia
AT graffcaroline csfglialmarkersareelevatedinasubsetofpatientswithgeneticfrontotemporaldementia
AT gerhardalexander csfglialmarkersareelevatedinasubsetofpatientswithgeneticfrontotemporaldementia
AT laforcerobert csfglialmarkersareelevatedinasubsetofpatientswithgeneticfrontotemporaldementia
AT sanchezvalleraquel csfglialmarkersareelevatedinasubsetofpatientswithgeneticfrontotemporaldementia
AT demendoncaalexandre csfglialmarkersareelevatedinasubsetofpatientswithgeneticfrontotemporaldementia
AT morenofermin csfglialmarkersareelevatedinasubsetofpatientswithgeneticfrontotemporaldementia
AT synofzikmatthis csfglialmarkersareelevatedinasubsetofpatientswithgeneticfrontotemporaldementia
AT vandenbergherik csfglialmarkersareelevatedinasubsetofpatientswithgeneticfrontotemporaldementia
AT ducharmesimon csfglialmarkersareelevatedinasubsetofpatientswithgeneticfrontotemporaldementia
AT berisabellele csfglialmarkersareelevatedinasubsetofpatientswithgeneticfrontotemporaldementia
AT levinjohannes csfglialmarkersareelevatedinasubsetofpatientswithgeneticfrontotemporaldementia
AT ottomarkus csfglialmarkersareelevatedinasubsetofpatientswithgeneticfrontotemporaldementia
AT pasquierflorence csfglialmarkersareelevatedinasubsetofpatientswithgeneticfrontotemporaldementia
AT santanaisabel csfglialmarkersareelevatedinasubsetofpatientswithgeneticfrontotemporaldementia
AT zetterberghenrik csfglialmarkersareelevatedinasubsetofpatientswithgeneticfrontotemporaldementia
AT rohrerjonathand csfglialmarkersareelevatedinasubsetofpatientswithgeneticfrontotemporaldementia
AT csfglialmarkersareelevatedinasubsetofpatientswithgeneticfrontotemporaldementia