Cargando…

Technoeconomic Feasibility of a Sunflower Husk Fast Pyrolysis Value Chain for the Production of Advanced Biofuels

[Image: see text] Biofuels are required to reach the target set out by the European Commission’s Transport mandate in the RED II (Renewable Energy Directive) for 2020–2030. To avoid indirect land use change, waste biomass resources such as sunflower husks can be used for advanced biofuel production....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nieder-Heitmann, Mieke, Savadkouhi, Sadaf S., Venderbosch, Robbie, Leijenhorst, Evert, van der Pol, Evert, Vleeming, Hank
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Chemical Society 2022
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9639661/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36366752
http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.energyfuels.2c01594
_version_ 1784825688336891904
author Nieder-Heitmann, Mieke
Savadkouhi, Sadaf S.
Venderbosch, Robbie
Leijenhorst, Evert
van der Pol, Evert
Vleeming, Hank
author_facet Nieder-Heitmann, Mieke
Savadkouhi, Sadaf S.
Venderbosch, Robbie
Leijenhorst, Evert
van der Pol, Evert
Vleeming, Hank
author_sort Nieder-Heitmann, Mieke
collection PubMed
description [Image: see text] Biofuels are required to reach the target set out by the European Commission’s Transport mandate in the RED II (Renewable Energy Directive) for 2020–2030. To avoid indirect land use change, waste biomass resources such as sunflower husks can be used for advanced biofuel production. A process simulation and technoeconomic assessment of three fast pyrolysis plant scenarios were conducted. The nature of the waste feedstock has an effect on the value chain configuration, fast pyrolysis, and upgrading process design. Considering the difficulties with the transport and storage of biogenic waste due to low bulk density or hazardous and pathogenic content in case of transporting untreated sunflower husks, it is recommended to use a hub-and-spoke type of decentralized value chain configuration. The fast pyrolysis plants are located close to the feedstock, and the fast pyrolysis bio-oil (FPBO) is transported to a single upgrading facility, colocated at an existing refinery. The upgraded FPBO is then cofed into an FCC (fluidized catalyst cracker), where partially green biofuels such as gasoline and diesel are produced. For the fast pyrolysis process design, Scenario 2, treating 10 t/h of dry biomass with electricity and steam as coproducts, has the most favorable economic results with a total capital investment (TCI) of 78 million Euro and operating expenses (OPEX) of 6 million Euro.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9639661
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher American Chemical Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-96396612023-10-12 Technoeconomic Feasibility of a Sunflower Husk Fast Pyrolysis Value Chain for the Production of Advanced Biofuels Nieder-Heitmann, Mieke Savadkouhi, Sadaf S. Venderbosch, Robbie Leijenhorst, Evert van der Pol, Evert Vleeming, Hank Energy Fuels [Image: see text] Biofuels are required to reach the target set out by the European Commission’s Transport mandate in the RED II (Renewable Energy Directive) for 2020–2030. To avoid indirect land use change, waste biomass resources such as sunflower husks can be used for advanced biofuel production. A process simulation and technoeconomic assessment of three fast pyrolysis plant scenarios were conducted. The nature of the waste feedstock has an effect on the value chain configuration, fast pyrolysis, and upgrading process design. Considering the difficulties with the transport and storage of biogenic waste due to low bulk density or hazardous and pathogenic content in case of transporting untreated sunflower husks, it is recommended to use a hub-and-spoke type of decentralized value chain configuration. The fast pyrolysis plants are located close to the feedstock, and the fast pyrolysis bio-oil (FPBO) is transported to a single upgrading facility, colocated at an existing refinery. The upgraded FPBO is then cofed into an FCC (fluidized catalyst cracker), where partially green biofuels such as gasoline and diesel are produced. For the fast pyrolysis process design, Scenario 2, treating 10 t/h of dry biomass with electricity and steam as coproducts, has the most favorable economic results with a total capital investment (TCI) of 78 million Euro and operating expenses (OPEX) of 6 million Euro. American Chemical Society 2022-10-12 2022-11-03 /pmc/articles/PMC9639661/ /pubmed/36366752 http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.energyfuels.2c01594 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Published by American Chemical Society https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/Permits non-commercial access and re-use, provided that author attribution and integrity are maintained; but does not permit creation of adaptations or other derivative works (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Nieder-Heitmann, Mieke
Savadkouhi, Sadaf S.
Venderbosch, Robbie
Leijenhorst, Evert
van der Pol, Evert
Vleeming, Hank
Technoeconomic Feasibility of a Sunflower Husk Fast Pyrolysis Value Chain for the Production of Advanced Biofuels
title Technoeconomic Feasibility of a Sunflower Husk Fast Pyrolysis Value Chain for the Production of Advanced Biofuels
title_full Technoeconomic Feasibility of a Sunflower Husk Fast Pyrolysis Value Chain for the Production of Advanced Biofuels
title_fullStr Technoeconomic Feasibility of a Sunflower Husk Fast Pyrolysis Value Chain for the Production of Advanced Biofuels
title_full_unstemmed Technoeconomic Feasibility of a Sunflower Husk Fast Pyrolysis Value Chain for the Production of Advanced Biofuels
title_short Technoeconomic Feasibility of a Sunflower Husk Fast Pyrolysis Value Chain for the Production of Advanced Biofuels
title_sort technoeconomic feasibility of a sunflower husk fast pyrolysis value chain for the production of advanced biofuels
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9639661/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36366752
http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.energyfuels.2c01594
work_keys_str_mv AT niederheitmannmieke technoeconomicfeasibilityofasunflowerhuskfastpyrolysisvaluechainfortheproductionofadvancedbiofuels
AT savadkouhisadafs technoeconomicfeasibilityofasunflowerhuskfastpyrolysisvaluechainfortheproductionofadvancedbiofuels
AT venderboschrobbie technoeconomicfeasibilityofasunflowerhuskfastpyrolysisvaluechainfortheproductionofadvancedbiofuels
AT leijenhorstevert technoeconomicfeasibilityofasunflowerhuskfastpyrolysisvaluechainfortheproductionofadvancedbiofuels
AT vanderpolevert technoeconomicfeasibilityofasunflowerhuskfastpyrolysisvaluechainfortheproductionofadvancedbiofuels
AT vleeminghank technoeconomicfeasibilityofasunflowerhuskfastpyrolysisvaluechainfortheproductionofadvancedbiofuels