Cargando…

Current status of acute ischemic stroke management in Iran: Findings from a single-center study

OBJECTIVES: This study investigated the current status of acute ischemic stroke (AIS) management in an Iranian emergency department (ED). METHODS: A descriptive study using a retrospective chart review was conducted on medical records of 270 patients with AIS who presented to the ED of a tertiary un...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Askari-Majdabadi, Hesamedin, Basereh, Zahra, Soheili, Amin, Powers, Kelly, Soleimani, Mohsen, Mirmohammdkhani, Majid, Saleh, Tahoura Afshari
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9639744/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36353381
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/2452-2473.357344
_version_ 1784825704717746176
author Askari-Majdabadi, Hesamedin
Basereh, Zahra
Soheili, Amin
Powers, Kelly
Soleimani, Mohsen
Mirmohammdkhani, Majid
Saleh, Tahoura Afshari
author_facet Askari-Majdabadi, Hesamedin
Basereh, Zahra
Soheili, Amin
Powers, Kelly
Soleimani, Mohsen
Mirmohammdkhani, Majid
Saleh, Tahoura Afshari
author_sort Askari-Majdabadi, Hesamedin
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: This study investigated the current status of acute ischemic stroke (AIS) management in an Iranian emergency department (ED). METHODS: A descriptive study using a retrospective chart review was conducted on medical records of 270 patients with AIS who presented to the ED of a tertiary university hospital in the northeast of Iran from March 22 to September 22, 2019. The steps of this review process included instrument identification, medical records retrieval, data extraction, and data verification. RESULTS: Of patients with AIS, 88.9% (n = 240) did not receive stroke code activation. For the 11.1% of patients (n = 30) who received activation, 7% of codes (n = 19) were canceled by the acute stroke team and IV recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (r-tPA) was only administered for 4.1% of patients (n = 11). ED arrival outside 4.5 h from symptom onset was the main barrier to IV r-tPA administration for 83.8% of potentially eligible patients with AIS (n = 217). The median door-to-needle time was 70 min (interquartile range: 47–90 min). CONCLUSIONS: There was a better clinical performance in terms of critical time goals in potentially eligible patients with AIS if managed with stroke team activation compared to no stroke team activation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9639744
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-96397442022-11-08 Current status of acute ischemic stroke management in Iran: Findings from a single-center study Askari-Majdabadi, Hesamedin Basereh, Zahra Soheili, Amin Powers, Kelly Soleimani, Mohsen Mirmohammdkhani, Majid Saleh, Tahoura Afshari Turk J Emerg Med Original Article OBJECTIVES: This study investigated the current status of acute ischemic stroke (AIS) management in an Iranian emergency department (ED). METHODS: A descriptive study using a retrospective chart review was conducted on medical records of 270 patients with AIS who presented to the ED of a tertiary university hospital in the northeast of Iran from March 22 to September 22, 2019. The steps of this review process included instrument identification, medical records retrieval, data extraction, and data verification. RESULTS: Of patients with AIS, 88.9% (n = 240) did not receive stroke code activation. For the 11.1% of patients (n = 30) who received activation, 7% of codes (n = 19) were canceled by the acute stroke team and IV recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (r-tPA) was only administered for 4.1% of patients (n = 11). ED arrival outside 4.5 h from symptom onset was the main barrier to IV r-tPA administration for 83.8% of potentially eligible patients with AIS (n = 217). The median door-to-needle time was 70 min (interquartile range: 47–90 min). CONCLUSIONS: There was a better clinical performance in terms of critical time goals in potentially eligible patients with AIS if managed with stroke team activation compared to no stroke team activation. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2022-09-30 /pmc/articles/PMC9639744/ /pubmed/36353381 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/2452-2473.357344 Text en Copyright: © 2022 Turkish Journal of Emergency Medicine https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Askari-Majdabadi, Hesamedin
Basereh, Zahra
Soheili, Amin
Powers, Kelly
Soleimani, Mohsen
Mirmohammdkhani, Majid
Saleh, Tahoura Afshari
Current status of acute ischemic stroke management in Iran: Findings from a single-center study
title Current status of acute ischemic stroke management in Iran: Findings from a single-center study
title_full Current status of acute ischemic stroke management in Iran: Findings from a single-center study
title_fullStr Current status of acute ischemic stroke management in Iran: Findings from a single-center study
title_full_unstemmed Current status of acute ischemic stroke management in Iran: Findings from a single-center study
title_short Current status of acute ischemic stroke management in Iran: Findings from a single-center study
title_sort current status of acute ischemic stroke management in iran: findings from a single-center study
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9639744/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36353381
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/2452-2473.357344
work_keys_str_mv AT askarimajdabadihesamedin currentstatusofacuteischemicstrokemanagementiniranfindingsfromasinglecenterstudy
AT baserehzahra currentstatusofacuteischemicstrokemanagementiniranfindingsfromasinglecenterstudy
AT soheiliamin currentstatusofacuteischemicstrokemanagementiniranfindingsfromasinglecenterstudy
AT powerskelly currentstatusofacuteischemicstrokemanagementiniranfindingsfromasinglecenterstudy
AT soleimanimohsen currentstatusofacuteischemicstrokemanagementiniranfindingsfromasinglecenterstudy
AT mirmohammdkhanimajid currentstatusofacuteischemicstrokemanagementiniranfindingsfromasinglecenterstudy
AT salehtahouraafshari currentstatusofacuteischemicstrokemanagementiniranfindingsfromasinglecenterstudy