Cargando…

Presence of the partner in the operating room during emergency caesarean section: A scoping review

BACKGROUND: Emergency caesarean sections are often very urgent, with limited time for informing and guiding parents. Is it preferable to leave the partner outside of the operating room, or let the partner accompany the mother? OBJECTIVE: This review aimed to provide an overview of the available evid...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nedergaard, Helene K., Balaganeshan, Thanikaivashan, Weitling, Eva E., Petersen, Henriette S., Brøchner, Anne C.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9640284/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36239403
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/EJA.0000000000001761
_version_ 1784825812865777664
author Nedergaard, Helene K.
Balaganeshan, Thanikaivashan
Weitling, Eva E.
Petersen, Henriette S.
Brøchner, Anne C.
author_facet Nedergaard, Helene K.
Balaganeshan, Thanikaivashan
Weitling, Eva E.
Petersen, Henriette S.
Brøchner, Anne C.
author_sort Nedergaard, Helene K.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Emergency caesarean sections are often very urgent, with limited time for informing and guiding parents. Is it preferable to leave the partner outside of the operating room, or let the partner accompany the mother? OBJECTIVE: This review aimed to provide an overview of the available evidence regarding the presence of the partner in the operating room during emergency caesarean sections. DESIGN: Scoping review. DATA SOURCES: A systematic literature search was performed in PubMed, Embase, Cinahl and the Cochrane Library. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: All published literature reporting on emergency caesarean sections in regional or general anaesthesia with the partner present in the operating room were eligible, no matter the design. RESULTS: Twenty-four titles, published between 1984 and 2020, were included; 15 contained original clinical findings and 9 were letters/debates. Quality of evidence was assessed using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool and found to be very low/low (17 studies), moderate (6) or good (1). Studies originated from Europe (16 studies), USA/Canada (4), South America (2), Asia (1) and Africa (1). Content data were thematically summarised and were overall either in favour or against having the partner present. Staff seemed reluctant to let partners be present for caesarean sections under general anaesthesia; mothers and partners preferred the partners’ presence. Under regional anaesthesia, parents also wished for the partners’ presence and described the caesarean section under regional anaesthesia as a predominantly positive experience. Most staff had a favourable attitude towards letting the partner be present for caesarean sections under regional anaesthesia. CONCLUSION: Limited evidence exists regarding the presence of the partner during emergency caesarean sections, but is of low quality. Most parents prefer having their partner present. Staff can be reluctant, especially when general anaesthesia is used.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9640284
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-96402842022-11-14 Presence of the partner in the operating room during emergency caesarean section: A scoping review Nedergaard, Helene K. Balaganeshan, Thanikaivashan Weitling, Eva E. Petersen, Henriette S. Brøchner, Anne C. Eur J Anaesthesiol Obstetrics BACKGROUND: Emergency caesarean sections are often very urgent, with limited time for informing and guiding parents. Is it preferable to leave the partner outside of the operating room, or let the partner accompany the mother? OBJECTIVE: This review aimed to provide an overview of the available evidence regarding the presence of the partner in the operating room during emergency caesarean sections. DESIGN: Scoping review. DATA SOURCES: A systematic literature search was performed in PubMed, Embase, Cinahl and the Cochrane Library. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: All published literature reporting on emergency caesarean sections in regional or general anaesthesia with the partner present in the operating room were eligible, no matter the design. RESULTS: Twenty-four titles, published between 1984 and 2020, were included; 15 contained original clinical findings and 9 were letters/debates. Quality of evidence was assessed using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool and found to be very low/low (17 studies), moderate (6) or good (1). Studies originated from Europe (16 studies), USA/Canada (4), South America (2), Asia (1) and Africa (1). Content data were thematically summarised and were overall either in favour or against having the partner present. Staff seemed reluctant to let partners be present for caesarean sections under general anaesthesia; mothers and partners preferred the partners’ presence. Under regional anaesthesia, parents also wished for the partners’ presence and described the caesarean section under regional anaesthesia as a predominantly positive experience. Most staff had a favourable attitude towards letting the partner be present for caesarean sections under regional anaesthesia. CONCLUSION: Limited evidence exists regarding the presence of the partner during emergency caesarean sections, but is of low quality. Most parents prefer having their partner present. Staff can be reluctant, especially when general anaesthesia is used. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2022-12 2022-10-17 /pmc/articles/PMC9640284/ /pubmed/36239403 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/EJA.0000000000001761 Text en Copyright © 2022 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of the European Society of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND), where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)
spellingShingle Obstetrics
Nedergaard, Helene K.
Balaganeshan, Thanikaivashan
Weitling, Eva E.
Petersen, Henriette S.
Brøchner, Anne C.
Presence of the partner in the operating room during emergency caesarean section: A scoping review
title Presence of the partner in the operating room during emergency caesarean section: A scoping review
title_full Presence of the partner in the operating room during emergency caesarean section: A scoping review
title_fullStr Presence of the partner in the operating room during emergency caesarean section: A scoping review
title_full_unstemmed Presence of the partner in the operating room during emergency caesarean section: A scoping review
title_short Presence of the partner in the operating room during emergency caesarean section: A scoping review
title_sort presence of the partner in the operating room during emergency caesarean section: a scoping review
topic Obstetrics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9640284/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36239403
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/EJA.0000000000001761
work_keys_str_mv AT nedergaardhelenek presenceofthepartnerintheoperatingroomduringemergencycaesareansectionascopingreview
AT balaganeshanthanikaivashan presenceofthepartnerintheoperatingroomduringemergencycaesareansectionascopingreview
AT weitlingevae presenceofthepartnerintheoperatingroomduringemergencycaesareansectionascopingreview
AT petersenhenriettes presenceofthepartnerintheoperatingroomduringemergencycaesareansectionascopingreview
AT brøchnerannec presenceofthepartnerintheoperatingroomduringemergencycaesareansectionascopingreview