Cargando…
Risk-Adjusting Mortality in the Nationwide Veterans Affairs Healthcare System
BACKGROUND: The US Veterans Affairs (VA) healthcare system began reporting risk-adjusted mortality for intensive care (ICU) admissions in 2005. However, while the VA’s mortality model has been updated and adapted for risk-adjustment of all inpatient hospitalizations, recent model performance has not...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer International Publishing
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9640507/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35028862 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11606-021-07377-1 |
_version_ | 1784825862733955072 |
---|---|
author | Prescott, Hallie C Kadel, Rajendra P Eyman, Julie R Freyberg, Ron Quarrick, Matthew Brewer, David Hasselbeck, Rachael |
author_facet | Prescott, Hallie C Kadel, Rajendra P Eyman, Julie R Freyberg, Ron Quarrick, Matthew Brewer, David Hasselbeck, Rachael |
author_sort | Prescott, Hallie C |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The US Veterans Affairs (VA) healthcare system began reporting risk-adjusted mortality for intensive care (ICU) admissions in 2005. However, while the VA’s mortality model has been updated and adapted for risk-adjustment of all inpatient hospitalizations, recent model performance has not been published. We sought to assess the current performance of VA’s 4 standardized mortality models: acute care 30-day mortality (acute care SMR-30); ICU 30-day mortality (ICU SMR-30); acute care in-hospital mortality (acute care SMR); and ICU in-hospital mortality (ICU SMR). METHODS: Retrospective cohort study with split derivation and validation samples. Standardized mortality models were fit using derivation data, with coefficients applied to the validation sample. Nationwide VA hospitalizations that met model inclusion criteria during fiscal years 2017–2018(derivation) and 2019 (validation) were included. Model performance was evaluated using c-statistics to assess discrimination and comparison of observed versus predicted deaths to assess calibration. RESULTS: Among 1,143,351 hospitalizations eligible for the acute care SMR-30 during 2017–2019, in-hospital mortality was 1.8%, and 30-day mortality was 4.3%. C-statistics for the SMR models in validation data were 0.870 (acute care SMR-30); 0.864 (ICU SMR-30); 0.914 (acute care SMR); and 0.887 (ICU SMR). There were 16,036 deaths (4.29% mortality) in the SMR-30 validation cohort versus 17,458 predicted deaths (4.67%), reflecting 0.38% over-prediction. Across deciles of predicted risk, the absolute difference in observed versus predicted percent mortality was a mean of 0.38%, with a maximum error of 1.81% seen in the highest-risk decile. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: The VA’s SMR models, which incorporate patient physiology on presentation, are highly predictive and demonstrate good calibration both overall and across risk deciles. The current SMR models perform similarly to the initial ICU SMR model, indicating appropriate adaption and re-calibration. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11606-021-07377-1. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9640507 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Springer International Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-96405072022-11-15 Risk-Adjusting Mortality in the Nationwide Veterans Affairs Healthcare System Prescott, Hallie C Kadel, Rajendra P Eyman, Julie R Freyberg, Ron Quarrick, Matthew Brewer, David Hasselbeck, Rachael J Gen Intern Med Original Research BACKGROUND: The US Veterans Affairs (VA) healthcare system began reporting risk-adjusted mortality for intensive care (ICU) admissions in 2005. However, while the VA’s mortality model has been updated and adapted for risk-adjustment of all inpatient hospitalizations, recent model performance has not been published. We sought to assess the current performance of VA’s 4 standardized mortality models: acute care 30-day mortality (acute care SMR-30); ICU 30-day mortality (ICU SMR-30); acute care in-hospital mortality (acute care SMR); and ICU in-hospital mortality (ICU SMR). METHODS: Retrospective cohort study with split derivation and validation samples. Standardized mortality models were fit using derivation data, with coefficients applied to the validation sample. Nationwide VA hospitalizations that met model inclusion criteria during fiscal years 2017–2018(derivation) and 2019 (validation) were included. Model performance was evaluated using c-statistics to assess discrimination and comparison of observed versus predicted deaths to assess calibration. RESULTS: Among 1,143,351 hospitalizations eligible for the acute care SMR-30 during 2017–2019, in-hospital mortality was 1.8%, and 30-day mortality was 4.3%. C-statistics for the SMR models in validation data were 0.870 (acute care SMR-30); 0.864 (ICU SMR-30); 0.914 (acute care SMR); and 0.887 (ICU SMR). There were 16,036 deaths (4.29% mortality) in the SMR-30 validation cohort versus 17,458 predicted deaths (4.67%), reflecting 0.38% over-prediction. Across deciles of predicted risk, the absolute difference in observed versus predicted percent mortality was a mean of 0.38%, with a maximum error of 1.81% seen in the highest-risk decile. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: The VA’s SMR models, which incorporate patient physiology on presentation, are highly predictive and demonstrate good calibration both overall and across risk deciles. The current SMR models perform similarly to the initial ICU SMR model, indicating appropriate adaption and re-calibration. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11606-021-07377-1. Springer International Publishing 2022-01-13 2022-11 /pmc/articles/PMC9640507/ /pubmed/35028862 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11606-021-07377-1 Text en © This is a U.S. government work and not under copyright protection in the U.S.; foreign copyright protection may apply 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Original Research Prescott, Hallie C Kadel, Rajendra P Eyman, Julie R Freyberg, Ron Quarrick, Matthew Brewer, David Hasselbeck, Rachael Risk-Adjusting Mortality in the Nationwide Veterans Affairs Healthcare System |
title | Risk-Adjusting Mortality in the Nationwide Veterans Affairs Healthcare System |
title_full | Risk-Adjusting Mortality in the Nationwide Veterans Affairs Healthcare System |
title_fullStr | Risk-Adjusting Mortality in the Nationwide Veterans Affairs Healthcare System |
title_full_unstemmed | Risk-Adjusting Mortality in the Nationwide Veterans Affairs Healthcare System |
title_short | Risk-Adjusting Mortality in the Nationwide Veterans Affairs Healthcare System |
title_sort | risk-adjusting mortality in the nationwide veterans affairs healthcare system |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9640507/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35028862 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11606-021-07377-1 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT prescotthalliec riskadjustingmortalityinthenationwideveteransaffairshealthcaresystem AT kadelrajendrap riskadjustingmortalityinthenationwideveteransaffairshealthcaresystem AT eymanjulier riskadjustingmortalityinthenationwideveteransaffairshealthcaresystem AT freybergron riskadjustingmortalityinthenationwideveteransaffairshealthcaresystem AT quarrickmatthew riskadjustingmortalityinthenationwideveteransaffairshealthcaresystem AT brewerdavid riskadjustingmortalityinthenationwideveteransaffairshealthcaresystem AT hasselbeckrachael riskadjustingmortalityinthenationwideveteransaffairshealthcaresystem |