Cargando…

Risk-Adjusting Mortality in the Nationwide Veterans Affairs Healthcare System

BACKGROUND: The US Veterans Affairs (VA) healthcare system began reporting risk-adjusted mortality for intensive care (ICU) admissions in 2005. However, while the VA’s mortality model has been updated and adapted for risk-adjustment of all inpatient hospitalizations, recent model performance has not...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Prescott, Hallie C, Kadel, Rajendra P, Eyman, Julie R, Freyberg, Ron, Quarrick, Matthew, Brewer, David, Hasselbeck, Rachael
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9640507/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35028862
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11606-021-07377-1
_version_ 1784825862733955072
author Prescott, Hallie C
Kadel, Rajendra P
Eyman, Julie R
Freyberg, Ron
Quarrick, Matthew
Brewer, David
Hasselbeck, Rachael
author_facet Prescott, Hallie C
Kadel, Rajendra P
Eyman, Julie R
Freyberg, Ron
Quarrick, Matthew
Brewer, David
Hasselbeck, Rachael
author_sort Prescott, Hallie C
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The US Veterans Affairs (VA) healthcare system began reporting risk-adjusted mortality for intensive care (ICU) admissions in 2005. However, while the VA’s mortality model has been updated and adapted for risk-adjustment of all inpatient hospitalizations, recent model performance has not been published. We sought to assess the current performance of VA’s 4 standardized mortality models: acute care 30-day mortality (acute care SMR-30); ICU 30-day mortality (ICU SMR-30); acute care in-hospital mortality (acute care SMR); and ICU in-hospital mortality (ICU SMR). METHODS: Retrospective cohort study with split derivation and validation samples. Standardized mortality models were fit using derivation data, with coefficients applied to the validation sample. Nationwide VA hospitalizations that met model inclusion criteria during fiscal years 2017–2018(derivation) and 2019 (validation) were included. Model performance was evaluated using c-statistics to assess discrimination and comparison of observed versus predicted deaths to assess calibration. RESULTS: Among 1,143,351 hospitalizations eligible for the acute care SMR-30 during 2017–2019, in-hospital mortality was 1.8%, and 30-day mortality was 4.3%. C-statistics for the SMR models in validation data were 0.870 (acute care SMR-30); 0.864 (ICU SMR-30); 0.914 (acute care SMR); and 0.887 (ICU SMR). There were 16,036 deaths (4.29% mortality) in the SMR-30 validation cohort versus 17,458 predicted deaths (4.67%), reflecting 0.38% over-prediction. Across deciles of predicted risk, the absolute difference in observed versus predicted percent mortality was a mean of 0.38%, with a maximum error of 1.81% seen in the highest-risk decile. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: The VA’s SMR models, which incorporate patient physiology on presentation, are highly predictive and demonstrate good calibration both overall and across risk deciles. The current SMR models perform similarly to the initial ICU SMR model, indicating appropriate adaption and re-calibration. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11606-021-07377-1.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9640507
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-96405072022-11-15 Risk-Adjusting Mortality in the Nationwide Veterans Affairs Healthcare System Prescott, Hallie C Kadel, Rajendra P Eyman, Julie R Freyberg, Ron Quarrick, Matthew Brewer, David Hasselbeck, Rachael J Gen Intern Med Original Research BACKGROUND: The US Veterans Affairs (VA) healthcare system began reporting risk-adjusted mortality for intensive care (ICU) admissions in 2005. However, while the VA’s mortality model has been updated and adapted for risk-adjustment of all inpatient hospitalizations, recent model performance has not been published. We sought to assess the current performance of VA’s 4 standardized mortality models: acute care 30-day mortality (acute care SMR-30); ICU 30-day mortality (ICU SMR-30); acute care in-hospital mortality (acute care SMR); and ICU in-hospital mortality (ICU SMR). METHODS: Retrospective cohort study with split derivation and validation samples. Standardized mortality models were fit using derivation data, with coefficients applied to the validation sample. Nationwide VA hospitalizations that met model inclusion criteria during fiscal years 2017–2018(derivation) and 2019 (validation) were included. Model performance was evaluated using c-statistics to assess discrimination and comparison of observed versus predicted deaths to assess calibration. RESULTS: Among 1,143,351 hospitalizations eligible for the acute care SMR-30 during 2017–2019, in-hospital mortality was 1.8%, and 30-day mortality was 4.3%. C-statistics for the SMR models in validation data were 0.870 (acute care SMR-30); 0.864 (ICU SMR-30); 0.914 (acute care SMR); and 0.887 (ICU SMR). There were 16,036 deaths (4.29% mortality) in the SMR-30 validation cohort versus 17,458 predicted deaths (4.67%), reflecting 0.38% over-prediction. Across deciles of predicted risk, the absolute difference in observed versus predicted percent mortality was a mean of 0.38%, with a maximum error of 1.81% seen in the highest-risk decile. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: The VA’s SMR models, which incorporate patient physiology on presentation, are highly predictive and demonstrate good calibration both overall and across risk deciles. The current SMR models perform similarly to the initial ICU SMR model, indicating appropriate adaption and re-calibration. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11606-021-07377-1. Springer International Publishing 2022-01-13 2022-11 /pmc/articles/PMC9640507/ /pubmed/35028862 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11606-021-07377-1 Text en © This is a U.S. government work and not under copyright protection in the U.S.; foreign copyright protection may apply 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Research
Prescott, Hallie C
Kadel, Rajendra P
Eyman, Julie R
Freyberg, Ron
Quarrick, Matthew
Brewer, David
Hasselbeck, Rachael
Risk-Adjusting Mortality in the Nationwide Veterans Affairs Healthcare System
title Risk-Adjusting Mortality in the Nationwide Veterans Affairs Healthcare System
title_full Risk-Adjusting Mortality in the Nationwide Veterans Affairs Healthcare System
title_fullStr Risk-Adjusting Mortality in the Nationwide Veterans Affairs Healthcare System
title_full_unstemmed Risk-Adjusting Mortality in the Nationwide Veterans Affairs Healthcare System
title_short Risk-Adjusting Mortality in the Nationwide Veterans Affairs Healthcare System
title_sort risk-adjusting mortality in the nationwide veterans affairs healthcare system
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9640507/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35028862
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11606-021-07377-1
work_keys_str_mv AT prescotthalliec riskadjustingmortalityinthenationwideveteransaffairshealthcaresystem
AT kadelrajendrap riskadjustingmortalityinthenationwideveteransaffairshealthcaresystem
AT eymanjulier riskadjustingmortalityinthenationwideveteransaffairshealthcaresystem
AT freybergron riskadjustingmortalityinthenationwideveteransaffairshealthcaresystem
AT quarrickmatthew riskadjustingmortalityinthenationwideveteransaffairshealthcaresystem
AT brewerdavid riskadjustingmortalityinthenationwideveteransaffairshealthcaresystem
AT hasselbeckrachael riskadjustingmortalityinthenationwideveteransaffairshealthcaresystem