Cargando…
Extraperitoneal tissue retraction technique: An effective assistant of extraperitoneal pure single-port robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy with the da Vinci Si surgical system
OBJECTIVE: The limitations of tissue retraction and the amount of surgical working space have a great impact on extraperitoneal single-port robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy (sp-RARP) with the multiport robotic surgical system. We used an extraperitoneal tissue retraction technique to achieve t...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9640769/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36386533 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2022.941104 |
_version_ | 1784825934799437824 |
---|---|
author | Ju, Guanqun Wang, Zhijun Shi, Jiazi Xu, Weidong Zhang, Zongqin Yin, Lei Xu, Dongliang Ren, Shancheng |
author_facet | Ju, Guanqun Wang, Zhijun Shi, Jiazi Xu, Weidong Zhang, Zongqin Yin, Lei Xu, Dongliang Ren, Shancheng |
author_sort | Ju, Guanqun |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: The limitations of tissue retraction and the amount of surgical working space have a great impact on extraperitoneal single-port robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy (sp-RARP) with the multiport robotic surgical system. We used an extraperitoneal tissue retraction technique to achieve tissue exposure and working space expansion. This study evaluated the safety, feasibility, and efficacy of the extraperitoneal tissue retraction technique in extraperitoneal pure sp-RARP with the da Vinci Si surgical system. METHODS: Data from 42 patients were analyzed retrospectively from December 2018 to February 2020. The extraperitoneal tissue retraction technique was not used in 20 patients (group I) and was used in 22 patients (group II). Preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative data were collected. The oncological and functional data during late follow-up were recorded. RESULTS: All patients successfully underwent extraperitoneal pure sp-RARP. No patients required conversion to a multiport surgery or placement of additional assistant ports. The two groups were similar regarding baseline features. The median operation time in group I was significantly longer than that in group II (P < 0.001). The estimated blood loss volume in group I was significantly higher than that in group II (P < 0.001). There were no serious complications in either group. There were four cases of peritoneal tears in group I and none in group II (P = 0.043). The surgical margin and lymph nodes were negative in both groups. The oncological and functional outcomes were similar between the two groups 6 months after the procedure. CONCLUSIONS: The extraperitoneal tissue retraction technique is safe and feasible. The technique promotes tissue exposure and expands the surgical working space, which is important for achieving extraperitoneal pure sp-RARP with the da Vinci Si surgical system, especially for beginners. The short-term oncological and functional outcomes were within acceptable ranges. The long-term effects of this technique need further evaluation. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9640769 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-96407692022-11-15 Extraperitoneal tissue retraction technique: An effective assistant of extraperitoneal pure single-port robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy with the da Vinci Si surgical system Ju, Guanqun Wang, Zhijun Shi, Jiazi Xu, Weidong Zhang, Zongqin Yin, Lei Xu, Dongliang Ren, Shancheng Front Surg Surgery OBJECTIVE: The limitations of tissue retraction and the amount of surgical working space have a great impact on extraperitoneal single-port robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy (sp-RARP) with the multiport robotic surgical system. We used an extraperitoneal tissue retraction technique to achieve tissue exposure and working space expansion. This study evaluated the safety, feasibility, and efficacy of the extraperitoneal tissue retraction technique in extraperitoneal pure sp-RARP with the da Vinci Si surgical system. METHODS: Data from 42 patients were analyzed retrospectively from December 2018 to February 2020. The extraperitoneal tissue retraction technique was not used in 20 patients (group I) and was used in 22 patients (group II). Preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative data were collected. The oncological and functional data during late follow-up were recorded. RESULTS: All patients successfully underwent extraperitoneal pure sp-RARP. No patients required conversion to a multiport surgery or placement of additional assistant ports. The two groups were similar regarding baseline features. The median operation time in group I was significantly longer than that in group II (P < 0.001). The estimated blood loss volume in group I was significantly higher than that in group II (P < 0.001). There were no serious complications in either group. There were four cases of peritoneal tears in group I and none in group II (P = 0.043). The surgical margin and lymph nodes were negative in both groups. The oncological and functional outcomes were similar between the two groups 6 months after the procedure. CONCLUSIONS: The extraperitoneal tissue retraction technique is safe and feasible. The technique promotes tissue exposure and expands the surgical working space, which is important for achieving extraperitoneal pure sp-RARP with the da Vinci Si surgical system, especially for beginners. The short-term oncological and functional outcomes were within acceptable ranges. The long-term effects of this technique need further evaluation. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-10-25 /pmc/articles/PMC9640769/ /pubmed/36386533 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2022.941104 Text en © 2022 Ju, Wang, Shi, Xu, Zhang, Yin, Xu and Ren. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Surgery Ju, Guanqun Wang, Zhijun Shi, Jiazi Xu, Weidong Zhang, Zongqin Yin, Lei Xu, Dongliang Ren, Shancheng Extraperitoneal tissue retraction technique: An effective assistant of extraperitoneal pure single-port robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy with the da Vinci Si surgical system |
title | Extraperitoneal tissue retraction technique: An effective assistant of extraperitoneal pure single-port robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy with the da Vinci Si surgical system |
title_full | Extraperitoneal tissue retraction technique: An effective assistant of extraperitoneal pure single-port robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy with the da Vinci Si surgical system |
title_fullStr | Extraperitoneal tissue retraction technique: An effective assistant of extraperitoneal pure single-port robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy with the da Vinci Si surgical system |
title_full_unstemmed | Extraperitoneal tissue retraction technique: An effective assistant of extraperitoneal pure single-port robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy with the da Vinci Si surgical system |
title_short | Extraperitoneal tissue retraction technique: An effective assistant of extraperitoneal pure single-port robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy with the da Vinci Si surgical system |
title_sort | extraperitoneal tissue retraction technique: an effective assistant of extraperitoneal pure single-port robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy with the da vinci si surgical system |
topic | Surgery |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9640769/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36386533 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2022.941104 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT juguanqun extraperitonealtissueretractiontechniqueaneffectiveassistantofextraperitonealpuresingleportroboticassistedradicalprostatectomywiththedavincisisurgicalsystem AT wangzhijun extraperitonealtissueretractiontechniqueaneffectiveassistantofextraperitonealpuresingleportroboticassistedradicalprostatectomywiththedavincisisurgicalsystem AT shijiazi extraperitonealtissueretractiontechniqueaneffectiveassistantofextraperitonealpuresingleportroboticassistedradicalprostatectomywiththedavincisisurgicalsystem AT xuweidong extraperitonealtissueretractiontechniqueaneffectiveassistantofextraperitonealpuresingleportroboticassistedradicalprostatectomywiththedavincisisurgicalsystem AT zhangzongqin extraperitonealtissueretractiontechniqueaneffectiveassistantofextraperitonealpuresingleportroboticassistedradicalprostatectomywiththedavincisisurgicalsystem AT yinlei extraperitonealtissueretractiontechniqueaneffectiveassistantofextraperitonealpuresingleportroboticassistedradicalprostatectomywiththedavincisisurgicalsystem AT xudongliang extraperitonealtissueretractiontechniqueaneffectiveassistantofextraperitonealpuresingleportroboticassistedradicalprostatectomywiththedavincisisurgicalsystem AT renshancheng extraperitonealtissueretractiontechniqueaneffectiveassistantofextraperitonealpuresingleportroboticassistedradicalprostatectomywiththedavincisisurgicalsystem |