Cargando…
Follow-Up Shadow Coaching Improves Primary Care Provider-Patient Interactions and Maintains Improvements When Conducted Regularly: A Spline Model Analysis
INTRODUCTION: Shadow coaching improves provider-patient interactions, as measured by CG-CAHPS® overall provider rating (OPR) and provider communication (PC). However, these improvements erode over time. AIM: Examine whether a second coaching session (re-coaching) improves and sustains patient experi...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer International Publishing
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9640810/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36344646 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11606-022-07881-y |
_version_ | 1784825944766152704 |
---|---|
author | Quigley, Denise D. Elliott, Marc N. Slaughter, Mary E. Talamantes, Efrain Hays, Ron D. |
author_facet | Quigley, Denise D. Elliott, Marc N. Slaughter, Mary E. Talamantes, Efrain Hays, Ron D. |
author_sort | Quigley, Denise D. |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Shadow coaching improves provider-patient interactions, as measured by CG-CAHPS® overall provider rating (OPR) and provider communication (PC). However, these improvements erode over time. AIM: Examine whether a second coaching session (re-coaching) improves and sustains patient experience. SETTING: Large, urban Federally Qualified Health Center PROGRAM: Trained providers observed patient care by colleagues and provided suggestions for improvement. Providers with OPRs<90 (0–100-point scale) were eligible. EVALUATION: We used stratified randomization based on provider type and OPR to assign half of the 40 eligible providers to re-coaching. For OPR and PC, we fit mixed-effects regression models with random-effects for provider (level of treatment assignment) and fixed-effects for time (linear spline with knots and possible “jump” at initial coaching and re-coaching), previous OPR, patient characteristics, and sites. We observed a statistically significant medium jump among re-coached providers after re-coaching on OPR (3.7 points) and PC (3.5 points); differences of 1, 3, and ≥5-points for CAHPS measures are considered small, medium, and large. Improvements from re-coaching persisted for 12 months for OPR and 8 months for PC. DISCUSSION: Re-coaching improved patient experience more than initial coaching, suggesting the reactivation of knowledge from initial coaching. However, re-coaching gains also eroded. Coaching should occur every 6 to 12 months to maintain behaviors and scores. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11606-022-07881-y. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9640810 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Springer International Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-96408102022-11-14 Follow-Up Shadow Coaching Improves Primary Care Provider-Patient Interactions and Maintains Improvements When Conducted Regularly: A Spline Model Analysis Quigley, Denise D. Elliott, Marc N. Slaughter, Mary E. Talamantes, Efrain Hays, Ron D. J Gen Intern Med Innovations in Clinical Practice INTRODUCTION: Shadow coaching improves provider-patient interactions, as measured by CG-CAHPS® overall provider rating (OPR) and provider communication (PC). However, these improvements erode over time. AIM: Examine whether a second coaching session (re-coaching) improves and sustains patient experience. SETTING: Large, urban Federally Qualified Health Center PROGRAM: Trained providers observed patient care by colleagues and provided suggestions for improvement. Providers with OPRs<90 (0–100-point scale) were eligible. EVALUATION: We used stratified randomization based on provider type and OPR to assign half of the 40 eligible providers to re-coaching. For OPR and PC, we fit mixed-effects regression models with random-effects for provider (level of treatment assignment) and fixed-effects for time (linear spline with knots and possible “jump” at initial coaching and re-coaching), previous OPR, patient characteristics, and sites. We observed a statistically significant medium jump among re-coached providers after re-coaching on OPR (3.7 points) and PC (3.5 points); differences of 1, 3, and ≥5-points for CAHPS measures are considered small, medium, and large. Improvements from re-coaching persisted for 12 months for OPR and 8 months for PC. DISCUSSION: Re-coaching improved patient experience more than initial coaching, suggesting the reactivation of knowledge from initial coaching. However, re-coaching gains also eroded. Coaching should occur every 6 to 12 months to maintain behaviors and scores. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11606-022-07881-y. Springer International Publishing 2022-11-07 2023-01 /pmc/articles/PMC9640810/ /pubmed/36344646 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11606-022-07881-y Text en © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Society of General Internal Medicine 2022 |
spellingShingle | Innovations in Clinical Practice Quigley, Denise D. Elliott, Marc N. Slaughter, Mary E. Talamantes, Efrain Hays, Ron D. Follow-Up Shadow Coaching Improves Primary Care Provider-Patient Interactions and Maintains Improvements When Conducted Regularly: A Spline Model Analysis |
title | Follow-Up Shadow Coaching Improves Primary Care Provider-Patient Interactions and Maintains Improvements When Conducted Regularly: A Spline Model Analysis |
title_full | Follow-Up Shadow Coaching Improves Primary Care Provider-Patient Interactions and Maintains Improvements When Conducted Regularly: A Spline Model Analysis |
title_fullStr | Follow-Up Shadow Coaching Improves Primary Care Provider-Patient Interactions and Maintains Improvements When Conducted Regularly: A Spline Model Analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Follow-Up Shadow Coaching Improves Primary Care Provider-Patient Interactions and Maintains Improvements When Conducted Regularly: A Spline Model Analysis |
title_short | Follow-Up Shadow Coaching Improves Primary Care Provider-Patient Interactions and Maintains Improvements When Conducted Regularly: A Spline Model Analysis |
title_sort | follow-up shadow coaching improves primary care provider-patient interactions and maintains improvements when conducted regularly: a spline model analysis |
topic | Innovations in Clinical Practice |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9640810/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36344646 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11606-022-07881-y |
work_keys_str_mv | AT quigleydenised followupshadowcoachingimprovesprimarycareproviderpatientinteractionsandmaintainsimprovementswhenconductedregularlyasplinemodelanalysis AT elliottmarcn followupshadowcoachingimprovesprimarycareproviderpatientinteractionsandmaintainsimprovementswhenconductedregularlyasplinemodelanalysis AT slaughtermarye followupshadowcoachingimprovesprimarycareproviderpatientinteractionsandmaintainsimprovementswhenconductedregularlyasplinemodelanalysis AT talamantesefrain followupshadowcoachingimprovesprimarycareproviderpatientinteractionsandmaintainsimprovementswhenconductedregularlyasplinemodelanalysis AT haysrond followupshadowcoachingimprovesprimarycareproviderpatientinteractionsandmaintainsimprovementswhenconductedregularlyasplinemodelanalysis |