Cargando…

Follow-Up Shadow Coaching Improves Primary Care Provider-Patient Interactions and Maintains Improvements When Conducted Regularly: A Spline Model Analysis

INTRODUCTION: Shadow coaching improves provider-patient interactions, as measured by CG-CAHPS® overall provider rating (OPR) and provider communication (PC). However, these improvements erode over time. AIM: Examine whether a second coaching session (re-coaching) improves and sustains patient experi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Quigley, Denise D., Elliott, Marc N., Slaughter, Mary E., Talamantes, Efrain, Hays, Ron D.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9640810/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36344646
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11606-022-07881-y
_version_ 1784825944766152704
author Quigley, Denise D.
Elliott, Marc N.
Slaughter, Mary E.
Talamantes, Efrain
Hays, Ron D.
author_facet Quigley, Denise D.
Elliott, Marc N.
Slaughter, Mary E.
Talamantes, Efrain
Hays, Ron D.
author_sort Quigley, Denise D.
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Shadow coaching improves provider-patient interactions, as measured by CG-CAHPS® overall provider rating (OPR) and provider communication (PC). However, these improvements erode over time. AIM: Examine whether a second coaching session (re-coaching) improves and sustains patient experience. SETTING: Large, urban Federally Qualified Health Center PROGRAM: Trained providers observed patient care by colleagues and provided suggestions for improvement. Providers with OPRs<90 (0–100-point scale) were eligible. EVALUATION: We used stratified randomization based on provider type and OPR to assign half of the 40 eligible providers to re-coaching. For OPR and PC, we fit mixed-effects regression models with random-effects for provider (level of treatment assignment) and fixed-effects for time (linear spline with knots and possible “jump” at initial coaching and re-coaching), previous OPR, patient characteristics, and sites. We observed a statistically significant medium jump among re-coached providers after re-coaching on OPR (3.7 points) and PC (3.5 points); differences of 1, 3, and ≥5-points for CAHPS measures are considered small, medium, and large. Improvements from re-coaching persisted for 12 months for OPR and 8 months for PC. DISCUSSION: Re-coaching improved patient experience more than initial coaching, suggesting the reactivation of knowledge from initial coaching. However, re-coaching gains also eroded. Coaching should occur every 6 to 12 months to maintain behaviors and scores. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11606-022-07881-y.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9640810
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-96408102022-11-14 Follow-Up Shadow Coaching Improves Primary Care Provider-Patient Interactions and Maintains Improvements When Conducted Regularly: A Spline Model Analysis Quigley, Denise D. Elliott, Marc N. Slaughter, Mary E. Talamantes, Efrain Hays, Ron D. J Gen Intern Med Innovations in Clinical Practice INTRODUCTION: Shadow coaching improves provider-patient interactions, as measured by CG-CAHPS® overall provider rating (OPR) and provider communication (PC). However, these improvements erode over time. AIM: Examine whether a second coaching session (re-coaching) improves and sustains patient experience. SETTING: Large, urban Federally Qualified Health Center PROGRAM: Trained providers observed patient care by colleagues and provided suggestions for improvement. Providers with OPRs<90 (0–100-point scale) were eligible. EVALUATION: We used stratified randomization based on provider type and OPR to assign half of the 40 eligible providers to re-coaching. For OPR and PC, we fit mixed-effects regression models with random-effects for provider (level of treatment assignment) and fixed-effects for time (linear spline with knots and possible “jump” at initial coaching and re-coaching), previous OPR, patient characteristics, and sites. We observed a statistically significant medium jump among re-coached providers after re-coaching on OPR (3.7 points) and PC (3.5 points); differences of 1, 3, and ≥5-points for CAHPS measures are considered small, medium, and large. Improvements from re-coaching persisted for 12 months for OPR and 8 months for PC. DISCUSSION: Re-coaching improved patient experience more than initial coaching, suggesting the reactivation of knowledge from initial coaching. However, re-coaching gains also eroded. Coaching should occur every 6 to 12 months to maintain behaviors and scores. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11606-022-07881-y. Springer International Publishing 2022-11-07 2023-01 /pmc/articles/PMC9640810/ /pubmed/36344646 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11606-022-07881-y Text en © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Society of General Internal Medicine 2022
spellingShingle Innovations in Clinical Practice
Quigley, Denise D.
Elliott, Marc N.
Slaughter, Mary E.
Talamantes, Efrain
Hays, Ron D.
Follow-Up Shadow Coaching Improves Primary Care Provider-Patient Interactions and Maintains Improvements When Conducted Regularly: A Spline Model Analysis
title Follow-Up Shadow Coaching Improves Primary Care Provider-Patient Interactions and Maintains Improvements When Conducted Regularly: A Spline Model Analysis
title_full Follow-Up Shadow Coaching Improves Primary Care Provider-Patient Interactions and Maintains Improvements When Conducted Regularly: A Spline Model Analysis
title_fullStr Follow-Up Shadow Coaching Improves Primary Care Provider-Patient Interactions and Maintains Improvements When Conducted Regularly: A Spline Model Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Follow-Up Shadow Coaching Improves Primary Care Provider-Patient Interactions and Maintains Improvements When Conducted Regularly: A Spline Model Analysis
title_short Follow-Up Shadow Coaching Improves Primary Care Provider-Patient Interactions and Maintains Improvements When Conducted Regularly: A Spline Model Analysis
title_sort follow-up shadow coaching improves primary care provider-patient interactions and maintains improvements when conducted regularly: a spline model analysis
topic Innovations in Clinical Practice
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9640810/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36344646
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11606-022-07881-y
work_keys_str_mv AT quigleydenised followupshadowcoachingimprovesprimarycareproviderpatientinteractionsandmaintainsimprovementswhenconductedregularlyasplinemodelanalysis
AT elliottmarcn followupshadowcoachingimprovesprimarycareproviderpatientinteractionsandmaintainsimprovementswhenconductedregularlyasplinemodelanalysis
AT slaughtermarye followupshadowcoachingimprovesprimarycareproviderpatientinteractionsandmaintainsimprovementswhenconductedregularlyasplinemodelanalysis
AT talamantesefrain followupshadowcoachingimprovesprimarycareproviderpatientinteractionsandmaintainsimprovementswhenconductedregularlyasplinemodelanalysis
AT haysrond followupshadowcoachingimprovesprimarycareproviderpatientinteractionsandmaintainsimprovementswhenconductedregularlyasplinemodelanalysis