Cargando…

Efficacy of COVID-19 vaccines: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of phase 3 randomized controlled trials

Several vaccines have been approved for the prevention of COVID-19. However, no head-to-head trials comparing their clinical efficacy have been performed. This network meta-analysis aims to identify those, among the competing existing vaccines, conferring the maximum protection against COVID-19. A l...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kumar, Subodh, Saikia, Dibyajyoti, Bankar, Mangesh, Saurabh, Manoj Kumar, Singh, Harminder, Varikasuvu, Sheshadri Reddy, Maharshi, Vikas
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9640819/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36342658
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s43440-022-00429-1
_version_ 1784825947123351552
author Kumar, Subodh
Saikia, Dibyajyoti
Bankar, Mangesh
Saurabh, Manoj Kumar
Singh, Harminder
Varikasuvu, Sheshadri Reddy
Maharshi, Vikas
author_facet Kumar, Subodh
Saikia, Dibyajyoti
Bankar, Mangesh
Saurabh, Manoj Kumar
Singh, Harminder
Varikasuvu, Sheshadri Reddy
Maharshi, Vikas
author_sort Kumar, Subodh
collection PubMed
description Several vaccines have been approved for the prevention of COVID-19. However, no head-to-head trials comparing their clinical efficacy have been performed. This network meta-analysis aims to identify those, among the competing existing vaccines, conferring the maximum protection against COVID-19. A literature search was done in Medline (via PubMed), Embase and Cochrane Library databases for phase 3 randomized controlled trials evaluating the efficacy of different COVID-19 vaccines. Search results were screened and eligible studies were included to perform a network meta-analysis in software ‘R’ version 4.1.2 using a random effect model. Cochrane’s ‘Risk of Bias tool (RoB2)’ was used for quality assessment. Raw data from the included studies was used for network meta-analysis. Assessment of inconsistency was not possible as no study compared two or more vaccines directly. A forest plot for indirect comparison of various COVID-19 vaccines was obtained. Rankogram and ‘P’ scores were obtained to rank the vaccines based on the indirect evidence of their comparative efficacy. A total of 17 randomized controlled trials evaluating the efficacy of 16 COVID-19 vaccines, were included in the network meta-analysis. A total of 361,386 participants was included in this network meta-analysis. Overall risk of bias among included studies was of ‘some concern’. All the COVID-19 vaccines had a statistically significant reduction of risk for contracting symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 in comparison to the placebo, however, the maximum protection (RR 0.05) was with BNT126b2. The indirect comparison also revealed BNT126b2 vaccine confers the highest protection against symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection in comparison to all others included, with a ‘P’ score of 0.9771 followed by mRNA-1273, rAD26 & rAD5 and NVX-CoV2373. The evidence generated from this network meta-analysis indicates the good efficacy of all the included vaccines in preventing symptomatic COVID-19 as compared to placebo. The BNT126b2 vaccine was found to provide the highest protection against symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 among all included followed by mRNA-1273, rAD26 & rAD5, NVX-CoV2373 and others. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s43440-022-00429-1.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9640819
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-96408192022-11-14 Efficacy of COVID-19 vaccines: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of phase 3 randomized controlled trials Kumar, Subodh Saikia, Dibyajyoti Bankar, Mangesh Saurabh, Manoj Kumar Singh, Harminder Varikasuvu, Sheshadri Reddy Maharshi, Vikas Pharmacol Rep Special Issue: Review Several vaccines have been approved for the prevention of COVID-19. However, no head-to-head trials comparing their clinical efficacy have been performed. This network meta-analysis aims to identify those, among the competing existing vaccines, conferring the maximum protection against COVID-19. A literature search was done in Medline (via PubMed), Embase and Cochrane Library databases for phase 3 randomized controlled trials evaluating the efficacy of different COVID-19 vaccines. Search results were screened and eligible studies were included to perform a network meta-analysis in software ‘R’ version 4.1.2 using a random effect model. Cochrane’s ‘Risk of Bias tool (RoB2)’ was used for quality assessment. Raw data from the included studies was used for network meta-analysis. Assessment of inconsistency was not possible as no study compared two or more vaccines directly. A forest plot for indirect comparison of various COVID-19 vaccines was obtained. Rankogram and ‘P’ scores were obtained to rank the vaccines based on the indirect evidence of their comparative efficacy. A total of 17 randomized controlled trials evaluating the efficacy of 16 COVID-19 vaccines, were included in the network meta-analysis. A total of 361,386 participants was included in this network meta-analysis. Overall risk of bias among included studies was of ‘some concern’. All the COVID-19 vaccines had a statistically significant reduction of risk for contracting symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 in comparison to the placebo, however, the maximum protection (RR 0.05) was with BNT126b2. The indirect comparison also revealed BNT126b2 vaccine confers the highest protection against symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection in comparison to all others included, with a ‘P’ score of 0.9771 followed by mRNA-1273, rAD26 & rAD5 and NVX-CoV2373. The evidence generated from this network meta-analysis indicates the good efficacy of all the included vaccines in preventing symptomatic COVID-19 as compared to placebo. The BNT126b2 vaccine was found to provide the highest protection against symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 among all included followed by mRNA-1273, rAD26 & rAD5, NVX-CoV2373 and others. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s43440-022-00429-1. Springer International Publishing 2022-11-07 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC9640819/ /pubmed/36342658 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s43440-022-00429-1 Text en © The Author(s) under exclusive licence to Maj Institute of Pharmacology Polish Academy of Sciences 2022, Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law. This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted research re-use and secondary analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the World Health Organization (WHO) declaration of COVID-19 as a global pandemic.
spellingShingle Special Issue: Review
Kumar, Subodh
Saikia, Dibyajyoti
Bankar, Mangesh
Saurabh, Manoj Kumar
Singh, Harminder
Varikasuvu, Sheshadri Reddy
Maharshi, Vikas
Efficacy of COVID-19 vaccines: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of phase 3 randomized controlled trials
title Efficacy of COVID-19 vaccines: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of phase 3 randomized controlled trials
title_full Efficacy of COVID-19 vaccines: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of phase 3 randomized controlled trials
title_fullStr Efficacy of COVID-19 vaccines: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of phase 3 randomized controlled trials
title_full_unstemmed Efficacy of COVID-19 vaccines: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of phase 3 randomized controlled trials
title_short Efficacy of COVID-19 vaccines: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of phase 3 randomized controlled trials
title_sort efficacy of covid-19 vaccines: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of phase 3 randomized controlled trials
topic Special Issue: Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9640819/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36342658
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s43440-022-00429-1
work_keys_str_mv AT kumarsubodh efficacyofcovid19vaccinesasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysisofphase3randomizedcontrolledtrials
AT saikiadibyajyoti efficacyofcovid19vaccinesasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysisofphase3randomizedcontrolledtrials
AT bankarmangesh efficacyofcovid19vaccinesasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysisofphase3randomizedcontrolledtrials
AT saurabhmanojkumar efficacyofcovid19vaccinesasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysisofphase3randomizedcontrolledtrials
AT singhharminder efficacyofcovid19vaccinesasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysisofphase3randomizedcontrolledtrials
AT varikasuvusheshadrireddy efficacyofcovid19vaccinesasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysisofphase3randomizedcontrolledtrials
AT maharshivikas efficacyofcovid19vaccinesasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysisofphase3randomizedcontrolledtrials