Cargando…
Artificial intelligence enabled ECG screening for left ventricular systolic dysfunction: a systematic review
Screening for left ventricular systolic dysfunction (LVSD), defined as reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), deserves renewed interest as the medical treatment for the prevention and progression of heart failure improves. We aimed to review the updated literature to outline the potentia...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer US
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9640840/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36344908 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10741-022-10283-1 |
_version_ | 1784825952014958592 |
---|---|
author | Bjerkén, Laura Vindeløv Rønborg, Søren Nicolaj Jensen, Magnus Thorsten Ørting, Silas Nyboe Nielsen, Olav Wendelboe |
author_facet | Bjerkén, Laura Vindeløv Rønborg, Søren Nicolaj Jensen, Magnus Thorsten Ørting, Silas Nyboe Nielsen, Olav Wendelboe |
author_sort | Bjerkén, Laura Vindeløv |
collection | PubMed |
description | Screening for left ventricular systolic dysfunction (LVSD), defined as reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), deserves renewed interest as the medical treatment for the prevention and progression of heart failure improves. We aimed to review the updated literature to outline the potential and caveats of using artificial intelligence–enabled electrocardiography (AIeECG) as an opportunistic screening tool for LVSD. We searched PubMed and Cochrane for variations of the terms “ECG,” “Heart Failure,” “systolic dysfunction,” and “Artificial Intelligence” from January 2010 to April 2022 and selected studies that reported the diagnostic accuracy and confounders of using AIeECG to detect LVSD. Out of 40 articles, we identified 15 relevant studies; eleven retrospective cohorts, three prospective cohorts, and one case series. Although various LVEF thresholds were used, AIeECG detected LVSD with a median AUC of 0.90 (IQR from 0.85 to 0.95), a sensitivity of 83.3% (IQR from 73 to 86.9%) and a specificity of 87% (IQR from 84.5 to 90.9%). AIeECG algorithms succeeded across a wide range of sex, age, and comorbidity and seemed especially useful in non-cardiology settings and when combined with natriuretic peptide testing. Furthermore, a false-positive AIeECG indicated a future development of LVSD. No studies investigated the effect on treatment or patient outcomes. This systematic review corroborates the arrival of a new generic biomarker, AIeECG, to improve the detection of LVSD. AIeECG, in addition to natriuretic peptides and echocardiograms, will improve screening for LVSD, but prospective randomized implementation trials with added therapy are needed to show cost-effectiveness and clinical significance. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10741-022-10283-1. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9640840 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Springer US |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-96408402022-11-14 Artificial intelligence enabled ECG screening for left ventricular systolic dysfunction: a systematic review Bjerkén, Laura Vindeløv Rønborg, Søren Nicolaj Jensen, Magnus Thorsten Ørting, Silas Nyboe Nielsen, Olav Wendelboe Heart Fail Rev Article Screening for left ventricular systolic dysfunction (LVSD), defined as reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), deserves renewed interest as the medical treatment for the prevention and progression of heart failure improves. We aimed to review the updated literature to outline the potential and caveats of using artificial intelligence–enabled electrocardiography (AIeECG) as an opportunistic screening tool for LVSD. We searched PubMed and Cochrane for variations of the terms “ECG,” “Heart Failure,” “systolic dysfunction,” and “Artificial Intelligence” from January 2010 to April 2022 and selected studies that reported the diagnostic accuracy and confounders of using AIeECG to detect LVSD. Out of 40 articles, we identified 15 relevant studies; eleven retrospective cohorts, three prospective cohorts, and one case series. Although various LVEF thresholds were used, AIeECG detected LVSD with a median AUC of 0.90 (IQR from 0.85 to 0.95), a sensitivity of 83.3% (IQR from 73 to 86.9%) and a specificity of 87% (IQR from 84.5 to 90.9%). AIeECG algorithms succeeded across a wide range of sex, age, and comorbidity and seemed especially useful in non-cardiology settings and when combined with natriuretic peptide testing. Furthermore, a false-positive AIeECG indicated a future development of LVSD. No studies investigated the effect on treatment or patient outcomes. This systematic review corroborates the arrival of a new generic biomarker, AIeECG, to improve the detection of LVSD. AIeECG, in addition to natriuretic peptides and echocardiograms, will improve screening for LVSD, but prospective randomized implementation trials with added therapy are needed to show cost-effectiveness and clinical significance. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10741-022-10283-1. Springer US 2022-11-08 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC9640840/ /pubmed/36344908 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10741-022-10283-1 Text en © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2022, Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law. This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted research re-use and secondary analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the World Health Organization (WHO) declaration of COVID-19 as a global pandemic. |
spellingShingle | Article Bjerkén, Laura Vindeløv Rønborg, Søren Nicolaj Jensen, Magnus Thorsten Ørting, Silas Nyboe Nielsen, Olav Wendelboe Artificial intelligence enabled ECG screening for left ventricular systolic dysfunction: a systematic review |
title | Artificial intelligence enabled ECG screening for left ventricular systolic dysfunction: a systematic review |
title_full | Artificial intelligence enabled ECG screening for left ventricular systolic dysfunction: a systematic review |
title_fullStr | Artificial intelligence enabled ECG screening for left ventricular systolic dysfunction: a systematic review |
title_full_unstemmed | Artificial intelligence enabled ECG screening for left ventricular systolic dysfunction: a systematic review |
title_short | Artificial intelligence enabled ECG screening for left ventricular systolic dysfunction: a systematic review |
title_sort | artificial intelligence enabled ecg screening for left ventricular systolic dysfunction: a systematic review |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9640840/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36344908 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10741-022-10283-1 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bjerkenlauravindeløv artificialintelligenceenabledecgscreeningforleftventricularsystolicdysfunctionasystematicreview AT rønborgsørennicolaj artificialintelligenceenabledecgscreeningforleftventricularsystolicdysfunctionasystematicreview AT jensenmagnusthorsten artificialintelligenceenabledecgscreeningforleftventricularsystolicdysfunctionasystematicreview AT ørtingsilasnyboe artificialintelligenceenabledecgscreeningforleftventricularsystolicdysfunctionasystematicreview AT nielsenolavwendelboe artificialintelligenceenabledecgscreeningforleftventricularsystolicdysfunctionasystematicreview |