Cargando…

Does the sizing of current cervical disc arthroplasty systems match Chinese cervical anatomic dimensions?

Objective: The objectives of this study were to analyze the computed tomography (CT) scan imaging data of the cervical spine from healthy volunteers and to correlate the measurements to the dimensions of current cervical disc arthroplasty systems. Methods: A total of 130 participants (78 males and 5...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wang, Lu, Bai, Meng, Li, Xing-Bin, Wang, Zhao-Rui, Wang, Bang, Huang, Ai-Bing
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9640970/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36394034
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2022.1036223
_version_ 1784825985111162880
author Wang, Lu
Bai, Meng
Li, Xing-Bin
Wang, Zhao-Rui
Wang, Bang
Huang, Ai-Bing
author_facet Wang, Lu
Bai, Meng
Li, Xing-Bin
Wang, Zhao-Rui
Wang, Bang
Huang, Ai-Bing
author_sort Wang, Lu
collection PubMed
description Objective: The objectives of this study were to analyze the computed tomography (CT) scan imaging data of the cervical spine from healthy volunteers and to correlate the measurements to the dimensions of current cervical disc arthroplasty systems. Methods: A total of 130 participants (78 males and 52 females) with a mean age of 41.0 years (range 18.0–66.0 years) who had undergone computed tomography scans of the cervical spine were included. The linear parameters of the C3 to C7 levels, including anterior-posterior diameter (AP), middle disc height (DH), anterior disc height (ADH), posterior disc height (PDH) and center mediolateral diameter (ML), were measured. The analysis was conducted comparing different cervical levels, sexes, and age groups. Known dimensions from eight cervical disc arthroplasty systems were compared with the morphologic data. Results: A total of 520 vertebral segments were measured. The mean values for the measured parameters were as follows: anterior-posterior diameter 16.08 ± 1.84 mm, mediolateral diameter 16.13 ± 1.99 mm, anterior disc height 3.88 ± 1.11 mm, disc height 5.73 ± 1.00 mm, posterior disc height 2.83 ± 0.94 mm, and mediolateral diameter/anterior-posterior diameter 1.01 ± 0.13. All parameters except for posterior disc height were significantly different across the different cervical levels (p < 0.05). There were also significant sex differences in terms of the linear parameters. No differences were found in the majority of parameters among the different age groups (p > 0.05), except for anterior-posterior diameter at the C6/7 level. A comparison of the bone dimensions from the study data and the dimensions of the implants indicated the presence of a size mismatch in the currently available cervical disc prostheses. Conclusion: There is a large discrepancy between the cervical anatomical data of Chinese patients and the sizes of currently available prostheses. The dimensions collected in this study could be used to design and develop appropriate disc prostheses for Chinese patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9640970
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-96409702022-11-15 Does the sizing of current cervical disc arthroplasty systems match Chinese cervical anatomic dimensions? Wang, Lu Bai, Meng Li, Xing-Bin Wang, Zhao-Rui Wang, Bang Huang, Ai-Bing Front Bioeng Biotechnol Bioengineering and Biotechnology Objective: The objectives of this study were to analyze the computed tomography (CT) scan imaging data of the cervical spine from healthy volunteers and to correlate the measurements to the dimensions of current cervical disc arthroplasty systems. Methods: A total of 130 participants (78 males and 52 females) with a mean age of 41.0 years (range 18.0–66.0 years) who had undergone computed tomography scans of the cervical spine were included. The linear parameters of the C3 to C7 levels, including anterior-posterior diameter (AP), middle disc height (DH), anterior disc height (ADH), posterior disc height (PDH) and center mediolateral diameter (ML), were measured. The analysis was conducted comparing different cervical levels, sexes, and age groups. Known dimensions from eight cervical disc arthroplasty systems were compared with the morphologic data. Results: A total of 520 vertebral segments were measured. The mean values for the measured parameters were as follows: anterior-posterior diameter 16.08 ± 1.84 mm, mediolateral diameter 16.13 ± 1.99 mm, anterior disc height 3.88 ± 1.11 mm, disc height 5.73 ± 1.00 mm, posterior disc height 2.83 ± 0.94 mm, and mediolateral diameter/anterior-posterior diameter 1.01 ± 0.13. All parameters except for posterior disc height were significantly different across the different cervical levels (p < 0.05). There were also significant sex differences in terms of the linear parameters. No differences were found in the majority of parameters among the different age groups (p > 0.05), except for anterior-posterior diameter at the C6/7 level. A comparison of the bone dimensions from the study data and the dimensions of the implants indicated the presence of a size mismatch in the currently available cervical disc prostheses. Conclusion: There is a large discrepancy between the cervical anatomical data of Chinese patients and the sizes of currently available prostheses. The dimensions collected in this study could be used to design and develop appropriate disc prostheses for Chinese patients. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-10-25 /pmc/articles/PMC9640970/ /pubmed/36394034 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2022.1036223 Text en Copyright © 2022 Wang, Bai, Li, Wang, Wang and Huang. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Bioengineering and Biotechnology
Wang, Lu
Bai, Meng
Li, Xing-Bin
Wang, Zhao-Rui
Wang, Bang
Huang, Ai-Bing
Does the sizing of current cervical disc arthroplasty systems match Chinese cervical anatomic dimensions?
title Does the sizing of current cervical disc arthroplasty systems match Chinese cervical anatomic dimensions?
title_full Does the sizing of current cervical disc arthroplasty systems match Chinese cervical anatomic dimensions?
title_fullStr Does the sizing of current cervical disc arthroplasty systems match Chinese cervical anatomic dimensions?
title_full_unstemmed Does the sizing of current cervical disc arthroplasty systems match Chinese cervical anatomic dimensions?
title_short Does the sizing of current cervical disc arthroplasty systems match Chinese cervical anatomic dimensions?
title_sort does the sizing of current cervical disc arthroplasty systems match chinese cervical anatomic dimensions?
topic Bioengineering and Biotechnology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9640970/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36394034
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2022.1036223
work_keys_str_mv AT wanglu doesthesizingofcurrentcervicaldiscarthroplastysystemsmatchchinesecervicalanatomicdimensions
AT baimeng doesthesizingofcurrentcervicaldiscarthroplastysystemsmatchchinesecervicalanatomicdimensions
AT lixingbin doesthesizingofcurrentcervicaldiscarthroplastysystemsmatchchinesecervicalanatomicdimensions
AT wangzhaorui doesthesizingofcurrentcervicaldiscarthroplastysystemsmatchchinesecervicalanatomicdimensions
AT wangbang doesthesizingofcurrentcervicaldiscarthroplastysystemsmatchchinesecervicalanatomicdimensions
AT huangaibing doesthesizingofcurrentcervicaldiscarthroplastysystemsmatchchinesecervicalanatomicdimensions