Cargando…

Impact of sarcopenia in bladder preservation therapy for muscle-invasive bladder cancer patients: a narrative review

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) is a biologically aggressive disease and its prognosis is poor. Radical cystectomy (RC) with urinary diversion and lymph node dissection is the gold standard treatment for MIBC patients. Accumulating evidence indicates that sarcopenia,...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fukushima, Hiroshi, Koga, Fumitaka
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: AME Publishing Company 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9641057/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36386266
http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/tau-22-355
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) is a biologically aggressive disease and its prognosis is poor. Radical cystectomy (RC) with urinary diversion and lymph node dissection is the gold standard treatment for MIBC patients. Accumulating evidence indicates that sarcopenia, the degenerative and systemic loss of skeletal muscle mass, is a significant predictor of higher rates of mortality and perioperative complications following RC. Recently, bladder preservation therapy has been offered as an alternative in appropriately selected MIBC patients who desire to preserve their bladders and those unfit or unwilling for RC. Here, we performed a narrative review on the impact of sarcopenia on oncological outcomes and complication rates in MIBC patients treated with bladder preservation therapy. METHODS: A literature review was performed using the PubMed and Scopus databases. KEY CONTENT AND FINDINGS: We identified two studies reported the impact of sarcopenia on responses to trimodal therapy and survival outcomes in MIBC patients. Consolidative partial cystectomy was performed in patients who achieved clinical complete response (CR) to trimodal therapy in one of the two studies. In both studies, CR rates to trimodal therapy are comparable between sarcopenic and non-sarcopenic patients. Sarcopenia was not significantly associated with shorter survival after completing bladder preservation therapy in either study. For complication rates of bladder preservation therapy, one study showed equivalent complication rates of consolidative partial cystectomy between sarcopenic and non-sarcopenic patients. In addition, in another small series of trimodal therapy, sarcopenic patients showed a higher rate of complications of trimodal therapy compared with non-sarcopenic patients. CONCLUSIONS: According to the result of our literature review, sarcopenia would not affect responses to trimodal therapy and prognosis in MIBC patients treated with bladder preservation therapy. Although the effect of sarcopenia on complication rates of bladder preservation therapy is inconclusive due to limited evidence, bladder preservation therapy could be a viable alternative option in carefully selected MIBC patients regardless of the presence of sarcopenia.