Cargando…
The diagnostic performance of contrast-enhanced ultrasound versus contrast-enhanced computed tomography for pancreatic carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis
BACKGROUND: Pancreatic carcinoma is a highly fatal disease, and early diagnosis is of vital importance. This meta-analysis aimed to compare the diagnostic performances of contrast-enhanced ultrasonography (CEUS) against contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CECT) for pancreatic carcinoma, using pat...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
AME Publishing Company
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9641093/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36388042 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/tcr-22-601 |
_version_ | 1784826017073856512 |
---|---|
author | Yan, Xiaoyi Lv, Ke Xiao, Mengsu Tan, Li Gui, Yang Zhang, Jing Chen, Xueqi Jia, Wanying Li, Jinglin |
author_facet | Yan, Xiaoyi Lv, Ke Xiao, Mengsu Tan, Li Gui, Yang Zhang, Jing Chen, Xueqi Jia, Wanying Li, Jinglin |
author_sort | Yan, Xiaoyi |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Pancreatic carcinoma is a highly fatal disease, and early diagnosis is of vital importance. This meta-analysis aimed to compare the diagnostic performances of contrast-enhanced ultrasonography (CEUS) against contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CECT) for pancreatic carcinoma, using pathological results or alternative imaging modality as the gold standard. METHODS: A thorough search was conducted in PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science and Cochrane Library databases. Two investigators selected the studies and extracted the data independently. A bivariate mixed-effects regression model was used to calculate the pooled data. Subgroup analysis and meta-regression were performed to explore the causes of heterogeneity. RESULTS: A total of 1,227 records were identified, of which 7 articles with 588 patients were assessed for eligibility. The overall sensitivity, specificity of CEUS and CECT with their 95% confidential intervals (95% CI) were 0.91 (0.85–0.94) and 0.88 (0.81–0.92), 0.83 (0.70–0.91) and 0.87 (0.73–0.94), respectively. The area under curve (AUC) of CEUS and CECT were 0.94 and 0.93. Subgroup analysis showed CEUS may be good at diagnosing lesions with diameters less than 2 cm. Tumor features, region and study type were the main causes of heterogeneity. CONCLUSIONS: CEUS has a satisfying diagnostic performance for pancreatic carcinoma and it has high sensitivity for small pancreatic carcinomas (≤2 cm); besides, it performs well in discriminating pancreatic cancer from chronic pancreatitis. Therefore, CEUS can be a useful supplement to CECT. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9641093 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | AME Publishing Company |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-96410932022-11-15 The diagnostic performance of contrast-enhanced ultrasound versus contrast-enhanced computed tomography for pancreatic carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis Yan, Xiaoyi Lv, Ke Xiao, Mengsu Tan, Li Gui, Yang Zhang, Jing Chen, Xueqi Jia, Wanying Li, Jinglin Transl Cancer Res Original Article BACKGROUND: Pancreatic carcinoma is a highly fatal disease, and early diagnosis is of vital importance. This meta-analysis aimed to compare the diagnostic performances of contrast-enhanced ultrasonography (CEUS) against contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CECT) for pancreatic carcinoma, using pathological results or alternative imaging modality as the gold standard. METHODS: A thorough search was conducted in PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science and Cochrane Library databases. Two investigators selected the studies and extracted the data independently. A bivariate mixed-effects regression model was used to calculate the pooled data. Subgroup analysis and meta-regression were performed to explore the causes of heterogeneity. RESULTS: A total of 1,227 records were identified, of which 7 articles with 588 patients were assessed for eligibility. The overall sensitivity, specificity of CEUS and CECT with their 95% confidential intervals (95% CI) were 0.91 (0.85–0.94) and 0.88 (0.81–0.92), 0.83 (0.70–0.91) and 0.87 (0.73–0.94), respectively. The area under curve (AUC) of CEUS and CECT were 0.94 and 0.93. Subgroup analysis showed CEUS may be good at diagnosing lesions with diameters less than 2 cm. Tumor features, region and study type were the main causes of heterogeneity. CONCLUSIONS: CEUS has a satisfying diagnostic performance for pancreatic carcinoma and it has high sensitivity for small pancreatic carcinomas (≤2 cm); besides, it performs well in discriminating pancreatic cancer from chronic pancreatitis. Therefore, CEUS can be a useful supplement to CECT. AME Publishing Company 2022-10 /pmc/articles/PMC9641093/ /pubmed/36388042 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/tcr-22-601 Text en 2022 Translational Cancer Research. All rights reserved. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/Open Access Statement: This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which permits the non-commercial replication and distribution of the article with the strict proviso that no changes or edits are made and the original work is properly cited (including links to both the formal publication through the relevant DOI and the license). See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Original Article Yan, Xiaoyi Lv, Ke Xiao, Mengsu Tan, Li Gui, Yang Zhang, Jing Chen, Xueqi Jia, Wanying Li, Jinglin The diagnostic performance of contrast-enhanced ultrasound versus contrast-enhanced computed tomography for pancreatic carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title | The diagnostic performance of contrast-enhanced ultrasound versus contrast-enhanced computed tomography for pancreatic carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full | The diagnostic performance of contrast-enhanced ultrasound versus contrast-enhanced computed tomography for pancreatic carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_fullStr | The diagnostic performance of contrast-enhanced ultrasound versus contrast-enhanced computed tomography for pancreatic carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | The diagnostic performance of contrast-enhanced ultrasound versus contrast-enhanced computed tomography for pancreatic carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_short | The diagnostic performance of contrast-enhanced ultrasound versus contrast-enhanced computed tomography for pancreatic carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_sort | diagnostic performance of contrast-enhanced ultrasound versus contrast-enhanced computed tomography for pancreatic carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9641093/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36388042 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/tcr-22-601 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT yanxiaoyi thediagnosticperformanceofcontrastenhancedultrasoundversuscontrastenhancedcomputedtomographyforpancreaticcarcinomaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT lvke thediagnosticperformanceofcontrastenhancedultrasoundversuscontrastenhancedcomputedtomographyforpancreaticcarcinomaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT xiaomengsu thediagnosticperformanceofcontrastenhancedultrasoundversuscontrastenhancedcomputedtomographyforpancreaticcarcinomaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT tanli thediagnosticperformanceofcontrastenhancedultrasoundversuscontrastenhancedcomputedtomographyforpancreaticcarcinomaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT guiyang thediagnosticperformanceofcontrastenhancedultrasoundversuscontrastenhancedcomputedtomographyforpancreaticcarcinomaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT zhangjing thediagnosticperformanceofcontrastenhancedultrasoundversuscontrastenhancedcomputedtomographyforpancreaticcarcinomaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT chenxueqi thediagnosticperformanceofcontrastenhancedultrasoundversuscontrastenhancedcomputedtomographyforpancreaticcarcinomaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT jiawanying thediagnosticperformanceofcontrastenhancedultrasoundversuscontrastenhancedcomputedtomographyforpancreaticcarcinomaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT lijinglin thediagnosticperformanceofcontrastenhancedultrasoundversuscontrastenhancedcomputedtomographyforpancreaticcarcinomaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT yanxiaoyi diagnosticperformanceofcontrastenhancedultrasoundversuscontrastenhancedcomputedtomographyforpancreaticcarcinomaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT lvke diagnosticperformanceofcontrastenhancedultrasoundversuscontrastenhancedcomputedtomographyforpancreaticcarcinomaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT xiaomengsu diagnosticperformanceofcontrastenhancedultrasoundversuscontrastenhancedcomputedtomographyforpancreaticcarcinomaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT tanli diagnosticperformanceofcontrastenhancedultrasoundversuscontrastenhancedcomputedtomographyforpancreaticcarcinomaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT guiyang diagnosticperformanceofcontrastenhancedultrasoundversuscontrastenhancedcomputedtomographyforpancreaticcarcinomaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT zhangjing diagnosticperformanceofcontrastenhancedultrasoundversuscontrastenhancedcomputedtomographyforpancreaticcarcinomaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT chenxueqi diagnosticperformanceofcontrastenhancedultrasoundversuscontrastenhancedcomputedtomographyforpancreaticcarcinomaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT jiawanying diagnosticperformanceofcontrastenhancedultrasoundversuscontrastenhancedcomputedtomographyforpancreaticcarcinomaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT lijinglin diagnosticperformanceofcontrastenhancedultrasoundversuscontrastenhancedcomputedtomographyforpancreaticcarcinomaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis |